Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Video shows police shoot Jacob Blake, an unarmed Black man, in the back" video.

  1. US soldiers have more stringent rules of engagement in a war zone, than US police on the streets.
    1
  2.  @eddiefigueroa9080  Are you claiming that justifies shooting an unarmed man in the back. Is that seriously what you are claiming?
    1
  3.  Ok Boomer ...and lick boots
    1
  4.  Ok Boomer  If others lick boots, then it appears it is enough to justify you doing it too. Logic.
    1
  5.  @eddiefigueroa9080  I am saying there is a better way, than just shooting people. It's a shame you are as incapable of thinking of alternatives to shooting, as that cop is.
    1
  6.  @eddiefigueroa9080  So the only improvements to the situation to improve outcome can only be made by the perp. Now that is some seriously arrogance. What, do the police have no room for improvement? Nice way to blanket absolve the police of everything forever. Just one thing I have always wondered...does boot polished stain your tongue?
    1
  7.  @alisonlouise6406  If... Seriously? You can't shoot someone for something they might or might not do.
    1
  8.  Wojak Batman  Here is what we do know... an unarmed man was shot in the back. That stuff you list tells me he needs to face a judge, not a street executioner. There are other ways to bring a man to justice. None of what you list entitles a cop to play judge jury and executioner
    1
  9.  @Caz1242  You aren't claiming a single procedure as valid for every state are you?
    1
  10.  @Caz1242  His life was not in danger.
    1
  11.  @Caz1242  I have a knife in my kitchen...no one's life is in danger. You seem to be happy to find a way to justify that outcome.
    1