Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "David Pakman Show" channel.

  1. This is the man that thought it was a good idea to brag that his doctor made him take a cognition test.
    34
  2. No one lost track. They knew exactly what was happening
    22
  3. Overlooking them may actually be part of the cause for these issues. Worth considering.
    14
  4. I am glad Biden was elected over Trump. This is a different subject than the question of how much respect the US gets. Sure, Trump lost respect, but getting rid of Trump doesn't changed many of the things that determine respect levels. I don't instantly and blindly respect based on the party badge.
    10
  5. Someone needs to ask her how they get to speak to her alternate personality. Highlight the ludicrous nature of it. Why are US journos so useless?
    7
  6. The best policy is determined by the scale of the problem at the time. What works in Australia or New Zealand is hugely successful...but it is too late for the US to mirror Australia or NZ's model.
    6
  7. Republicans have a real issue coping with being a minority.
    3
  8. It would stop many frivolous law suits, and free up the courts.
    3
  9. Leave the plane in the air, with him on board, for the entirety of the inauguration. Solved.
    3
  10. Paid his Deutsche Bank loans
    3
  11. Australia joining the mailing list. Throwing in a bonus Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.
    3
  12. As an Aussie I am trying to understand one small detail. Firstly, I get why these rules are terrible. For the record, we have compulsory voting in State and Federal elections...council elections are optional. The detail is voter ID. Why is it such a controversial point? Is there a cultural thing I am missing? I have seen this specific point labelled as racist in a few places ( not here ) I get why the package in it's entirety disenfranchises minorities, but this one detail seems to be important. What am I missing? NB Hoping this question will be taken more gracefully here, than on other channels. Thanks.
    2
  13.  @MxDae  Thanks. I will check out that other video too. I didn't realise acceptable ID would be so troublesome to acquire, and then tying more hoops to jump through adds another layer. I guess it is partially a cultural thing then too. Here a valid ID is not difficult or expensive, and producing ID is a quick verification that records match. With compulsory voting it is in our governments interest to make these things as easy as possible. And that Sunday voting thing really does take on a whole new level when you explain the tradition. Thanks for taking the time. Much appreciated.
    2
  14.  @MxDae  Over the last couple of years, I have noticed I need to be far more thankful for some of the things we are fortunate enough to be able to take for granted here.
    2
  15. Chose...past tense.
    2
  16. You should care. Blindly allowing anything but "x" is dangerous. Sure, wait for real facts, but don't automatically absolve anything blindly.
    2
  17. The boys get thrown under a bus, when it suits his needs. Ivanka runs for office, with the long term aim of President.
    2
  18. Why do "Fox" talk about "the media" as if they aren't part of "the media". Do they not consider themselves to be media?
    2
  19. "...the most civilised, the most just..." On behalf of the rest of the world... Hahahaha
    2
  20. It was a debate in the US as to which side to support.
    2
  21. @Brian Campbell The smartest thing the Aussie politicians did was realise the had no idea what they were talking about, and got out of the way of the actual professionals ( ...mostly, at least, we can argue the details)
    2
  22. Hmmm...so they just need to fall in line when told to. He just says it with slightly more acceptable rhetoric.
    2
  23. If you could prove that all science is wrong...then scientist everywhere would hold you in the highest regards.
    2
  24. He even bragged his doctor made him take a cognition test...
    2
  25. Fox made a choice too
    2
  26. The corruption IS the system.
    1
  27. Epstein was his employee. Chomsky is the mastermind behind the operation.
    1
  28. The con here is that BOTH parties are arguing about a 2 tier justice system, based on this ridiculous irrelevant debate. There definitely is one, and this farce is NOT looking into it - but will officially find that a 2 tier system doesn't exist. Convenient.
    1
  29. The virus doesn't care about your preferences.
    1
  30. Only 29% of Americans actively voted to stop him.
    1
  31.  @jamesbias1200  OK numbat. Do you really need me to explain why blindly letting politicians get away with anything all because they said or did 1 thing you like is not real bright? If I need to explain it, then I am not sure you are equipped to comprehend it.
    1
  32. Why don't wealthy people realise that a piece of shat with a wallet is still a piece of shat? Do they think the wallet changes that?
    1
  33. ​ @MrGrifft  It could be said that the majority voted for neither candidate. So why did one of them win?
    1
  34.  @MrGrifft  Yes - of course, I really truly believe that is how the system works. Of course I do. What else could I possibly mean? Make sure you take it literally.
    1
  35.  Mel Barrett  I didn't say she will win. Why do you need maturity to vote in a woman? I think the more important requirement is a decent candidate. Just voting in anyone, simply because they are a woman is an immature thing to do. If they were the best candidate, then we can have a different discussion.
    1
  36.  Mel Barrett  You seem to have a warped understanding of why people didn't want Hilary. The fact she is female is WAY down on the list of reasons she was rejected.
    1
  37.  Mel Barrett  Are you honestly trying to claim that the only reason Hilary wasn't elected is because of the patriarchal system? Grow up.
    1
  38.  Mel Barrett  Your question is a false equivalence. It basically highlights the lack of qualified candidates...not sexism.
    1
  39.  Mel Barrett  I can't believe you are so naive that you don't know why people voted against Hilary. Have you been living under a rock? You sound like a Trump supporter that can't believe Biden won.
    1
  40.  Mel Barrett  Why are you so hung up about directing this in the direction of Hilary? You made a wide sweeping generalisation and now it appears that generalisation is just something you cooked up to convince yourself that is the reason Hilary lost.
    1
  41.  Mel Barrett  If you can't see why using Hilary not getting elected, being proof of a patriarchal system is a false equivalence, then you will NEVER understand why the votes went that way. Her being female was WAY WAY down on the lists of reasons people didn't vote for her. Don't confuse yourself...we are not discussing what I think, we are discussing the voters thoughts. Don't mix them up...again.
    1
  42. Start at 1 mill a year. It has a great psychological trigger that they can't argue about.
    1
  43. Credit where it is due. Chris Wallace doesn't appear to think he is doing anything other than basic journalism. I think he is surprised that people see it any other way too.
    1
  44. 3:45 Hot mic remained after the edit
    1
  45. Are we supposed to think they were unaware that they were being recorded? Wow
    1
  46. I guess he is not competent to stand trial now. That defence works.
    1
  47. Plot twist : Trump was a Trojan Horse, and cleaning out the swamp actually means dismantle the Republican Party.
    1
  48. Cheering for a tax increase is one of the most bizarre things ever for Repugnantans
    1
  49. Is this a way for them to claim there isn't a 2 tier kegal system? There most definitely is, just not in the way they are pretending to argue about. To say there isn't a 2 tier system, based on this discussion, is pure gaslighting of the public by BOTH parties.
    1