Comments by "David Aspinall" (@yt.personal.identification) on "Joe's COVID Experience, CNN's Ivermectin Claims" video.

Try it. It is used as to treat horse with worms. That isn't wrong.
38
Weird fact - It's possible they are both spreaders of misinformation. You seem to think that one of them must be accurate. That isn't the case.
4
@damonodell9125 It is both you moronic clown. I never said it wasn't also approved for humans. Did I? That bit doesn't change the fact it is used for worms in horses. ...but don't let facts get in the way of your rant.
4
@mle1872 I am not defending CNN. Concentrate on what I am saying, not the bits your script fits, that I never said. All your bluster doesn't change the fact it is sold as a solution to specific types of worms in horses. One doesn't exclude the other. But sure, try abuse, that might help it appear like you might know what you are talking about.
3
@mudAnonymous, behind a keyboard...using the term beta. Hilarious. Look it up. It is ALSO sold a a horse medication. It is actually possible to be both...a human AND animal medication. Did that actually even cross your tiny mind?
2
@jeffreybritton3338 The relevant information, to this thread, is that it is indeed used in horse medication...amongst other things. The rest is flailing circle jerk.
2
@DEEPSTATE000 They have moved beyond "emergency use" and gained full approval. That talking point is old news. Ask your puppet masters to upgrade the script.
2
@sommebuddy Can't argue with any of that. In fact it makes way too much sense to be in here.
2
@redshield3296 He still hasn't sued. ...because it is an active ingredient in horse dewormer. You claim to be educated. You must understand it is a simple point I am making...that is factual. Conflate it with anything, won't make what I said any less true.
2
@fakepeople9385 Who is "they"?
1
@knuckle1493 Do that. Go to a farm feed store, and see if it is sold for horses too. Just make a call. Just because it is sold as a human drug, doesn't preclude it ALSO being used on animals. Seriously...how difficult is that to understand?
1
@borizh If you think Joe has never spread misinformation then that's on you. Don't get confused in to thinking I am saying he is doing it now. You deal in far too many absolutes to illustrate a genuine critical thinker.
1
@mle1872 I never said it wasn't used on humans. In fact I said it is BOTH. The point is, trying to sue CNN for saying it is a solution for horses with worms will fail...because it is ALSO a horse medication (among other things)
1
@sommebuddy Exactly! Thanks for making my point. What you said will make it difficult to sue CNN for calling it a horse wormer. Do you understand my point now? You were half way there, and seem like you have a better chance at true comprehension than most in here. It is used for BOTH humans and horses.
1
@damonodell9125 What does that even mean?
1
@sommebuddy You start by accepting that suing them will fail, and then rant as if it won't fail. You seem confused.
1
@mle1872 The medicine IS used for horses AND humans. They weren't wrong. Suing would fail. How is that so hard to understand?
1
@Chris-mc9kv The specifically named, trademarked active ingredient is common to both medications. Removing all the bluster, it's simple.
1
@Chris-mc9kv You speak as if you have ever been to an adult court. Stating that the active ingredient in the medication that Joe took is also an active ingredient in a horse medication won't be grounds for a successful case. Unless you have a transcript of the CNN report, you are working on the assumption they were foolish enough to word their report very badly. You can't be so stupid to actually think they didn't run the wording of the claim past a lawyer...can you? I
1
@Chris-mc9kv Joe WON'T SUE. He isn't that stupid.
1
@chrismcbride4839 If the mold was specifically designed, trademarked and purposefully added. Your analogy was missing some key steps.
1
@zaccy It's like thinking I could sue someone for claiming that mice sometimes eat cheese. That would be stupid, huh?
1
@Chris-mc9kv No I never said that. You appear to lack basic junior school level comprehension skills. I said the active ingredient is in both human and animal medications. Abuse me all you like, it won't turn this circle jerk factual.
1
@Chris-mc9kv They named the active ingredient, that is common to both. There is no law suit here. There will be no law suit. We can argue forever, because at no point in time will you ever be able to say " see, there is a case, I was right"...because it won't happen. You can just live with you circle jerk fantasy forever, as you can think this is never resolved...because no one will take this to court and win.
1
@danielpierce9876 Well said.
1
@mud You, stuck in this circle jerk of alpha/beta where you need the group to define your position...and you can't even comprehend a lone wolf thinking for themselves. When you grow up...
1
@Sean_Connery 🍆
1
@HITANASG1 If you think that will help win a court case against CNN then go ahead. You may just be the genius everyone has been looking for.
1
@HITANASG1 Why? Why should they? Who decide what their speech should be? You?
1
@HITANASG1 You didn't like the words the nasty CNN used. Will you be ok?
1
@HITANASG1 Seriously, I am sure you have found the key to winning the law suit discussed here. Genius.
1
@HITANASG1 To say I have been prescribed the same antibiotics as my dog wouldn't be offensive. I can't sue anyone for saying that.
1
@Destroy3612 Yup...it is for horse parasites amongst other things.
1
@Destroy3612 ...amongst other things, it is also a horse dewormer I see comprehension isn't your strong point. I understand your confusion now.
1
@Destroy3612 focusing on semantics is your biggest problem. None of what you said will mean he would be successful in an attempt to sue. That's why we haven't heard news of him suing. The rest is just pointless waffle.
1
@Destroy3612 What did I do to the title?
1
@Destroy3612 If you aren't discussing the entire point I have been making for days, then why tf did you address it to me?
1
@Franco-ss4bu What numbers did you just invent and hope resemble some kind of fact? You clearly have no idea and made stuff up.
1
@Franco-ss4bu Do you know why he hasn't sued? ...because it will fail.
1
@soyboy2238 Well ..it would still be factual. You know it to be factual, or else the example fails. After all this time, has he sued yet? Do you know why he hasn't sued? yet? Think about it. Did you even read the part where I was happy to admit I have taken the same penicillin as my dog? I am guessing no...or you would realise the futility of your example. It is a horse dewormer too. Accept it.
1
@Andrew-zm1zb Indeed it is disingenuous...totally agree. Being disingenuous isn't something you can be sued for.
1
@N why? Yes. That is common knowledge...and confirms you know it is a horse dewormer amongst other things. None of what you said means Ivermectin is not used as a horse dewormer. I am not going to get all triggered and yell and scream if someone reminds me I took the same anti-biotics after my operation as my dog did after his. Different dose, different delivery etc sure, but that doesn't change the fact I took the same antibiotics as my dog. ...and I am not going to be so soft that I need to sue someone for saying it. ...and I would lose if I tried. Do you know why he still hasn't sued after all this time? Principles?
1
@TurdFurgeson275 What I can say without fear of being sued is you and you family took the same medication given to horses. I know this, because you just to me.
1
@josephjones3729 Stop with the meth. It isn't helping
1
@YankeeDoodle2 It is a horse dewormer... and human medication. He took it. What part is a lie? It really isn't so complicated that you get confused
1
@YankeeDoodle2 You say that as if you think that matters. Why? That is not a lie. That is an irrelevant omission.
1