Comments by "Sunny Delight" (@sunnydelight5255) on "Innocence Project: New evidence could clear Scott Peterson | Banfield" video.

  1. Psychopaths like him are hilarious in a horrendous way. They know they did it but put on an act of innocence and even want to get out. They’re always innocent, someone else did it. Dude you were “fishing” where they were later found. Case closed.
    34
  2. Good point. As Dan Abrams laughed and pointed out, the burglars had her body but waited and followed her husband to pin it on him. When he randomly went fishing they dropped her where he was 😆
    9
  3. Exactly 😆😂🤣👌
    4
  4. He’s not. Her and the baby were later found in the water where he went “fishing”. He was at the crime scene. There’s no chance a relative coincidentally is in the same area.
    3
  5. The evidence was extremely strong circumstantial evidence that no one can ignore. Her and the baby were later found in the water where he went “fishing”. He was at the crime scene. There’s no chance a relative coincidentally is in the same area.
    3
  6.  @LanaMyslyvetsPlanners In no way lame. As strong as dna. There’s no chance a relative coincidentally is in the same area as where the mv is found. And who in her circle wanted to rid of her other than him.
    2
  7. He’s not. Her and the baby were later found in the water where he went “fishing”. He was at the crime scene. There’s no chance a relative coincidentally is in the same area.
    2
  8.  @Shelleyvanhouten27  He’s not. Her and the baby were later found in the water where he went “fishing”. He was at the crime scene. There’s no chance a relative coincidentally is in the same area.
    2