Comments by "MrAbrazildo" (@MrAbrazildo) on "Rust is Not C" video.

  1. 3:29, C++17 was a conservative and kind small standard. C++20 changed the way we write code. It's pretty elegant, still having the old C approaches. 3:42, I don't know about Rust, but C++ keeps its compatibility with crude methods from C, so that you can still solve things in dumb way. So this already defeats the allegedly "complexity" issue. It's also utterly nonsense to talk about "stability issue" in C++. It continues having its performance and unmatched flexibility, newer features cooperating with old ones. 4:15, this is pretty stupid. OO improved safety a lot. Lambdas are often used, higher level e safer than anything C is using - and 0 cost too. 9:50, there are tools for C/C++ that catch those errors, faster than Rust would compile. 13:08, C++ has the only right OO implementation and is the most flexible language so far. Unmatched on those. Aside from that, it's capable of everything C does and implements higher level features near as comfortable as higher level languages do. So it seems more like a "master of most things". 13:14, unwise.
    3