Comments by "Wobbles And Bean" (@WobblesandBean) on "COURT TV" channel.

  1. I'm so glad the prosecutor was a woman. You just know he was seething over that, was angry that a woman of all people was challenging him.
    52
  2. 1:42:42 He's trying to get her to play it again and again either to upset Anna's family, or for his own sick satisfaction. The first time it was played in court, you could see his hands pantomiming along with it, eyes half closed like he was gleefully reliving the moment. This man is terrifying.
    32
  3. Lol with what money?
    26
  4. ​​ @timewtell9239  Wow...nice victim blaming, there. Imagine telling on yourself like this. Anna did absolutely nothing wrong, you sound suspiciously like this dude here.
    16
  5. Not just that, but to blatantly lie in spite of the evidence, and then contradict that lie with another lie minutes later!
    16
  6. Definitely a chauvinist. And yes, his closing was all over the place. It was one of the worst closing arguments I've ever seen, and I watched the 3 hour endurance test that was Nancy Brophy's lawyer's closing!
    14
  7. Not to mention she taunted him and then went to sleep upstairs. If she was so terrified of him, and insistent that he could get out on his own, why would she do that? Her defense is absolutely ridiculous.
    14
  8. ​ @janaegalloway5976  There is literally no evidence for any of the things you just said Jorge did. Was he a good man? No. They were definitely abusive to each other. But Sarah was still the aggressor 95% of the time, she is a monster and there is no doubt that she is guilty.
    12
  9. ​ @Truth17John17  I completely disagree. I'm with the OP, she didn't want to kìII him. She wanted to torture him. She thought he'd just languish and suffer in there all night long, she didn't know positional asphyxiation is a thing.
    11
  10. ​ @amosfrench7169  They were both abusers. But Sarah was by far the worst of the two.
    10
  11. I have zero sympathy for him. He willingly handed all his money over to her after the divorce, way more than the alimony he gave her, never once tried to go to court to get full custody of his son despite knowing Sarah neglected him and placed him in dangerous situations like leaving him in the care of drunk strangers, and even paid for her first defense lawyer. Now his house is being foreclosed because he chose to pay for an expensive lawyer rather than pay his mortgage to keep a roof over his son's head. That poor kid doesn't stand a chance. His mother is this thing and his father is a spineless lump who can't possibly be a strong role model for him.
    9
  12. I'm really angry at this guy. Apparently he's considered a good lawyer, I have no idea why on earth he'd go out of his way to help her. His reputation should be forever tainted by this, I hope he gets laughed right out of any courtroom he tries to show his face in after this trial.
    8
  13. ​ @freedomfirst5557  No, Wooten did. Kraynich was only around for 7-9.
    8
  14. ​ @ryanhampson673  I cannot for the life of me understand why so many men in the comments keep saying he knows what he's doing. Are we watching the same court hearing? All I see is a bumbling fooI who is playing dirty and trying to rehash the same tired things over and over that the judge already addressed, multiple times by now.
    7
  15. ​ @adminRQ  I know. I see dozens of Andrew Tate fanboys in the comments, praising him and saying disgusting things about the prosecutor. Like, a shocking number of them. And men wonder why women are "standoffish" around them? Seriously? Yeah, of course we are, the majority of them are terrifying! Look who they just voted for!
    7
  16. Because he's a selfish little worm who thinks of himself as deserving of any little thing he wants while not caring one iota for his family who literally carried him through life. Also, Sylvii didn't play him. He played himself. She's just doing her job, I don't fault her fur gettin' that paycheck.
    7
  17. Right? I love it. He's definitely a man who is intimidated by strong women, so he lashes out at them. A real Andrew Tate type.
    6
  18. Well... she did. Look, Sarah is a monster, but it's ridiculous to deny that Jorge wasn't abusive or toxic in any way. He mooched off of Sarah's ex, didn't work, drank all day, and when it came to Sarah he gave as good as he got. Multiple people have confirmed this. His former roommate explicitly described him as "terrifying". What y'all are doing is called the perfect victim fallacy. You don't want to grapple with the moral conundrum of feeling such an outpouring of sympathy for someone who by all accounts, wasn't exactly a good person. You also don't want to give Sarah an inch by accepting that Jorge did in fact abuse her, just as she did to him, because you think it makes her sympathetic. I assure you, it doesn't. Accepting Jorge's faults do not make him any less deserving of justice. Frankly, I think it's a bit disrespectful to him and his family to deny who he is, because you're essentially tossing aside the real man to be forgotten in favor of an idealized fake version of him. I choose to remember the flawed man he was, not some character that looks better on paper. Well... she did. Look, Sarah is a monster, but it's ridiculous to deny that Jorge wasn't abusive or toxic in any way. He mooched off of Sarah's ex, didn't work, drank all day, and when it came to Sarah he gave as good as he got. Multiple people have confirmed this. His former roommate explicitly described him as "terrifying". What y'all are doing is called the perfect victim fallacy. You don't want to grapple with the moral conundrum of feeling such an outpouring of sympathy for someone who by all accounts, wasn't exactly a good person. You also don't want to give Sarah an inch by accepting that Jorge did in fact abuse her, just as she did to him, because you think it makes her sympathetic. I assure you, it doesn't. Accepting Jorge's faults do not make him any less deserving of justice. Frankly, I think it's a bit disrespectful to him and his family to deny who he is, because you're essentially tossing aside the real man to be forgotten in favor of a fake version who looks better on paper. I choose to remember him as he was. He may not have been a great person, but no one deserves this. I hope his family can finally close this chapter and begin to heal.
    6
  19. She apparently had help. A "youtube lawyer" has been on her side from the beginning, he's been giving her free legal advice. He went to go see her. He deleted his video about it cuz of the backlash. Just more proof that education ≠ intelligence.
    5
  20. ​ @kimberlyt3953  Yes, because Sarah always gets what she wants. 🙄 This dude straight up volunteered for this. He's absolutely wretched and I hope his reputation is ruined after this trial.
    5
  21. I agree. I wish he'd gotten the DP in this case.
    5
  22. ​ @PercheronAppLVR  Lol no he doesn't. All he did here was blow a bunch of hot air and keep trying to bring things up that have already been addressed by the judge.
    5
  23. Agreed, I'm glad judge Wooten is no longer handling this case. I don't think he would have handled this nearly as well. Sarah and Lionel Hutz here both need to be treated like a petulant child, and that's exactly what Kraynich is doing.
    5
  24. ​ @piscesimmortal4351  Imagine telling on yourself this badly.
    4
  25. I wonder what was being texted back? Was there even any response during those big blocks of her texts, or is she just rambling incoherent sentence fragments?
    4
  26. She got shot in the hand because she tried to grab the barrel of the gun. My heart is shattered thinking about that poor woman and her daughter. Their lives are over; they survived, but they didn't live.
    4
  27. I'm the same way with the Nancy Brophy case, another insufferable narcissist who talked herself into a guilty verdict. I highly recommend watching her testimony, it's not as explosive but she completely crumbles on the stand just like he does, and it's glorious to see.
    4
  28. Yup. He wanted his lawyers to ask specific questions, knowingly and deliberately committing perjury. He didn't see himself as their client, he saw himself as their equal, just as Sarah Boone did. They always think they're on par with the most seasoned attorneys.
    3
  29. YES! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Joke's on you, Jimmy boy. I hope your career is over after this trial.
    3
  30. ​ @samlott99  That phone, by the way, was the only one they had. Brian was paying for it and Jorge didn't want to work to afford his own, so Sarah "shared" the phone with him and used it to control him and limit his access to his family. Neither of them were good people, but Sarah was far and away the worst.
    3
  31. ​ @steelhurricane4041  To be fair, Jorge's former roommate and his neighbors all say he was a terrifying individual. There's no question that Jorge was also abusive. He just happened to fall into a toxic relationship with someone who was even worse.
    3
  32. I will never get tired of hearing the jury declare her guilty. The way Sarah looks at them as they are polled one by one, is immensely satisfying. She could have been a free woman in just a few short years, but now she'll spend the rest of her life behind bars. All because her ego wouldn't let her plead guilty.
    3
  33. 12:20 "She wanted a restraining order because you were abusive to her, correct?" "No, because I was physical with her." Only twelve minutes in, and there's my first headdesk. We got a real bright one here, don't we?
    3
  34. Daily reminder that Mentour Lawyer is practically in love with this woman and has been visiting her in court many times to give her free legal advice.
    3
  35. 2:47:30 The victim blaming is thoroughly disgusting. I'm so glad the jury saw right through that crap.
    3
  36. I loved seeing her smug little smirk gradually turn into a scowl. This James Owens guy is as oily as they come. He's the real life Saul Goodman.
    3
  37. Ha, I love the image you used for the thumbnail! Sarah honestly believes she's so beautiful that she could seduce the jury, that's why she raised such a stink over being allowed to wear a short skirt and makeup. But we have eyes, Sarah. Ain't no one lining up to kiss that lipless mouth.
    3
  38. Yup. I've seen so many lawyers on youtube (coincidentally all of them men, funny that) insist that her constitutional rights are being withheld, especially the 6th amendment. That is completely invalid. She waived her right to a speedy trial the moment the first continuance was requested by the defense. She is the one causing the delays, not the prosecution.
    3
  39. I loved seeing her smug little smirk gradually turn into a scowl. This James Owens guy is as oily as they come. He's the real life Saul Goodman.
    3
  40. Grant Amato only cares about himself. In his mind, anything he does is automatically justified simply because he's the one who did it. He sees nothing wrong with stealing money from his mom, dad, aunt, brother, and best friend, because he doesn't have any money and they do. He deserves to talk to Sylvie, so naturally, he took the money. It's just plain logistics, duh. Same thing when he stole $2,000 worth of propofol and drugged his patients because he didn't feel like having to deal with them.
    3
  41. ​ @Romulan2469  I know justice moves annoyingly slow, but you have to understand that this is the only way to ensure she has no grounds to appeal. She will absolutely try to claim ineffective counsel, but because she has refused to work with 8 goddamn lawyers, no judge will entertain the thought of granting her an appeal. Likewise, she can't claim her constitutional rights are being withheld, because the only person holding up her trial is herself.
    3
  42. Because throngs of weak men keep rushing to her aid.
    3
  43. He tried to get the judge disbarred because she humiliated him during the pretrial hearings. She asked him legal questions that he could not answer, showing he was nowhere near able to act pro se, and his ego couldn't stand for that.
    3
  44. My only complaint is that she doesn't ask any open ended questions at all. All she does is ask yes/no questions by making an accusory statement followed by "...Right?" Over and over and over. It would have been much more effective if she'd asked open questions so he'd tell more lies and get caught out on that, instead of giving him a thousand opportunities to flatly deny everything. However, I did like how she never backed down from him, which aggravated him to no end. And sure enough, he lost his temper on her, showing the jury his true, terrifying self.
    3
  45. ​ @Charliegirl2  That's....not why he was over there. Wth is the matter with you? Anna is the victim. I have no words.
    3
  46. Yeah, and look what happened when Anna left him. It's a bit concerning that you're putting the onus on women, and not the men who are actually doing the abusing. It's easy to judge when you've never been in her situation. But easy doesn't mean right.
    3
  47. ​ @ryanhampson673  Except not, because he's in this for himself, not her. And he's not going harder, he's just blustering. All he did was repeat the same useless things over and over, just like she did.
    3
  48. ​ @kathleencraghead5459  He's wasting everyone's time. All he did here was repeat himself and keep trying to bring up motions that Judge Kraynich already denied. Yet I keep seeing people, all men, in the comments saying this guy is an excellent defender and is doing a great job. It's astounding how easily impressed they are. If this is good lawyering, I'd hate to see what they think is bad lawyering.
    3
  49. They both gave as good as they got. Sarah just had an extra layer of psycho on top of it all.
    3
  50. Imagine calling someone "pork chop" and thinking that's a mic drop moment. Wow Sarah, you sure showed them. Next thing you know she'll be calling them ham slice. Oh, the scandal.
    2