Comments by "AWResistance" (@AlanWattResistance) on "David Cameron: Palace ‘displeasure’ at former PM - BBC News" video.

  1. He legalised gay marriage, i'll never forgive him for that.
    11
  2.  @icarusstudio6960  If marriage isn't exclusive to one man and one woman anymore, then why not Polygamy? You want people to start having more than one wife or husband like they do in the third world? English culture is going to change irrevocably because of the introduction of gay marriage.
    11
  3.  @b9y  Why shouldn't Polygamy be legal? And why not incest? Love is love bro.
    6
  4.  Brad Williams  Stop judging me.
    1
  5.  Brad Williams  I didn't judge anyone, I simply gave an opinion.
    1
  6.  @samjoshi1812  Why shouldn't it?
    1
  7.  @samjoshi1812  Ok then. Why should marriage be exclusive to two people?
    1
  8.  @samjoshi1812  If marriage shouldn't be exclusive to just one man and one woman, then why should it be exclusive to just one man and one woman, one man and one man, and one woman and one woman? If it's wrong to exclude same-sex couples from the institution of marriage, then why should polgymous couples be excluded? My argument is that if marriage isn't exclusive to the traditional form, then it cannot be exclusive to any form or forms. By hijacking marriage and imposing a redefinition of it onto society, you have rendered it meaningless and open to abuse.
    1
  9.  @samjoshi1812  Gay marriage was imposed onto society through the use of state force. It wasn't about equality or freedom, it was about the state expanding it's influence and power. No one ever banned gay people from marrying, because it was never even an option to be opposed, and an absurdity. Gay marriage is therefore social engineering and ideological subversion. And the reason marriage is only recongised between two people is because it only takes two people to make a child. As two men cannot conceive, marriage is now open to any number of members. Bigamy laws are therefore discriminatory and must be repealed.
    1
  10.  @samjoshi1812  Not yet anyway. We just have to wait for the usual groups to proclaim it an issue and then we're in action. No one complained about the lack of gay marriage 30-40 years ago, because everyone knew it was absurd and the media hadn't yet been fully taken over by activists. This ideological subversion isn't led by those affected by it, it led by those with an ulterior motive.
    1
  11.  @samjoshi1812  What is absurd about polygamy?
    1