Comments by "Stephen Villano" (@spvillano) on "Garand Thumb" channel.

  1. Yeah, but it was using a 300 Winchester magnum, not some 4 - 6 MOA carbine.
    3
  2. Depends upon the round, angle of impact and hence, path the round traveled and a bunch of other factors like round expansion. Compared to a 30-30 soft point, which is designed to expand inside the target and expend all of its energy inside of the target. As a hint, similar range with JFK, Oswald's round didn't evacuate his head at that 81 meters or so.
    2
  3. Oh, I could stage it quite precisely. Of course, everyone would see the rails that the round would be sliding along. The rifle he used is a 4 - 6 MOA rifle and round combination, the best that model can typically achieve is around 4 MOA. At 150 meters, that's around 5 - 7.5 inches circular error for the round with perfect marksmanship. To hit a quarter inch ear lobe to give a boo-boo. With perfect marksmanship, the head would've been struck with likely lethal effects and well, suffice it to say that perfect marksmanship was conspicuous in its absence and further removed after a few deliberate rounds by a high volume of fire one typically sees from those who just can't shoot worth a damn. The problem with most who claim it was staged is, they've absolutely no damned clue in the world what they're talking about in terms of ballistics, many also getting lost in weird weeds on terminal ballistics that are fanciful at best. They're bullets, not some science fiction guided munition that still don't exist, this ain't Star Trek. They're also bullets, not ICBM's. But, there are those who know far more than those of us who have used these very weapons and ammunition for years, multiple decades in many places, for they've acquired far more experience and knowledge from their vast experience acquired on their Twinkie encrusted sofa. And most of those "experts", incapable of hitting the broad side of a barn with the entire weapon at point blank range.
    1
  4.  @thattruckindrifter7232  welcome to the real world, where they fire what they're authorized to fire, not what they want to fire. I mean, otherwise why not use high explosive incendiary rounds, which would be a guaranteed kill? So, do you know what type of round that they're firing, when nobody else does? Do you think that even expanding ammunition is some high explosive kind of destructive device from all aspects that it impacts and traverses tissue? As an example, the skull shot destroyed the skull and emptied the contents quite distinctively and indeed, quite differently than is evidenced upon that rooftop, which is decidedly not entirely blood and brain spattered, but instead has a fairly contained zone confined to the ridges in the roof, in a relatively narrow stream. And you also forget one thing most forget, skin is tough and tends to hold a lot together that isn't expelled from within it.
    1
  5. Hwunting waskelwy wabbits?
    1