Comments by "Stephen Villano" (@spvillano) on "The Enforcer" channel.

  1. 5
  2.  @MrJDFallon  there is no entire world. START treaties limited how many deployable nukes the US and Russia have. The current numbers could at maximum destroy a maximum of 1/3 US cities and towns, if they ignored our military and utility infrastructure, which isn't likely and not ignoring those lessens how many cities get struck, as it takes a minimum of six warheads to destroy a military base. Meanwhile, a full countervalue, same conditions, would utterly depopulate Russia of cities and towns, as well as degrade their military capabilities significantly. Nuclear winter was a myth dispelled in the 1990's by Gulf War I and subsequent improved modeling, with some mild summers causing some degradation of crop yields, but nothing extinction level at all. End of the day, Russia would become literally extinct, the US heavily degraded and the winner would basically be China - ish, our fleets would still be afloat, just short a lot of national infrastructure to support them, but plenty abroad to still do so, national leadership on aircraft or in bunkers for a couple of weeks necessary for what fallout there is to decay. I started my military career in nukes, I know the field and doctrines well, as well as the actual results of nuclear weapons. Putin's desperate, but he's not stupid, nor is he suicidal. Nor is the Russian military, political and economic leadership types. Were he to even come close to considering using nuclear weapons, he'd suddenly "retire for health reasons" to his dacha in the woods, not to be heard from again.
    2
  3. 1