Comments by "Stephen Villano" (@spvillano) on "Steve Lehto" channel.

  1. 59
  2. 58
  3. 55
  4. 53
  5. 49
  6. 46
  7. 39
  8. 38
  9. 38
  10. 30
  11. 29
  12. 26
  13. 22
  14. 22
  15. 21
  16. 21
  17. 20
  18. 20
  19. 19
  20. 18
  21. 18
  22. 17
  23. 17
  24. 16
  25. 16
  26. 15
  27. 15
  28. 15
  29. 15
  30. 15
  31. 14
  32. 14
  33. 13
  34. 13
  35. 13
  36. 13
  37. 12
  38. 12
  39. 12
  40. 12
  41. 11
  42. 11
  43. 11
  44. 11
  45. 11
  46. 11
  47. 11
  48. 11
  49. 11
  50. 10
  51. 10
  52. 10
  53. 10
  54. 10
  55. 10
  56. 9
  57. 9
  58. 9
  59. 9
  60. 9
  61. 9
  62. 9
  63. 9
  64. 9
  65. 9
  66. 9
  67. 8
  68. 8
  69. 8
  70. 8
  71. 8
  72. 8
  73. 8
  74. 7
  75. 7
  76. 7
  77. 7
  78. 7
  79. 7
  80. 7
  81. 7
  82. 7
  83. 7
  84. 7
  85. 7
  86. 7
  87. 7
  88. 7
  89. 7
  90. 7
  91. 7
  92. 6
  93. 6
  94. 6
  95. 6
  96. 6
  97. 6
  98. 6
  99. 6
  100. 6
  101. 6
  102. 6
  103. 6
  104. 6
  105. 6
  106. 6
  107. 6
  108. 6
  109. 6
  110. 6
  111. 5
  112. 5
  113. 5
  114. 5
  115. 5
  116. 5
  117. 5
  118. 5
  119. 5
  120. 5
  121. 5
  122. 5
  123. 5
  124. 5
  125. 5
  126. 5
  127. 5
  128. 5
  129. 5
  130. 5
  131. 5
  132. 5
  133. 5
  134. 5
  135. 4
  136. 4
  137. 4
  138. 4
  139. 4
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. 4
  146. 4
  147. 4
  148. 4
  149. 4
  150. 4
  151. 4
  152. 4
  153. 4
  154. 4
  155. 4
  156. 4
  157. 4
  158. 4
  159. Bucks County, PA, around 30 years ago or so, a farm and some homes were eminent domained by the county for a shopping mall. Litigation ensued, the land was taken, the homeowners and farmer SOL. So, not exactly a novel practice. This simply made it to the SCOTUS, who found that a man's castle belongs to whoever the municipality, county or state damned well fells like giving it to to turn a buck. One remaining farm was under threat and matters went slightly different, as residents of multiple counties finally became outraged. It seems, that the general public consensus was that the courts were worthless, but a few remarked how inexpensive lead was and the farm remains there to this day. It would seem that the officers who made the decision to apply eminent domain to benefit private real estate developers decided to not potentially share Louis XVI's fate. Or maybe it was the ghost of Christmas Future... Never underestimate the folks around Philly. To my knowledge, we're the only US city to have artillery used by the populace against other members of the populace and also got away with killing members of the militia sent in to restore order during the Philadelphia Nativist Riots. Although, the Bronx has the distinction of having US Army artillery used against it during Bowery rioting over the Civil War conscription (wealthy bought their way out of conscription, which triggered the rioting). Although, I do wonder about how much of a part whisky played in starting the whiskey rebellion, which took no less than George Washington riding out of the capitol to meet the responding militia from other states to suppress. History is a rather interesting thing! It can be entertaining or downright horrifying.
    4
  160. 4
  161. 4
  162. 4
  163. 4
  164. 4
  165. 4
  166. 4
  167. 4
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 3
  233. 3
  234. 3
  235. 3
  236. 3
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. My first question is, WTF are you doing patrolling in front of the police department? Waiting for shift change, rather than performing your duty? I think we'll approach dealing with this abuse of taxpayer dollars via the budgetary process... Especially, given forfeiture came into abuse. I quite like my local PD. Instead of escalating and "ensuring control" via any means, they resolve problems, at times with some significant effort on their part for all parties in non-violent events. Their response time, despite that, is phenomenally fast. When my wife of over 40 years died, after my first cycle of CPR, I called 911 and resumed CPR. I got to my fourth and had to stop to let the officer in, who checked and at a dead run, ran to his cruiser for an AED. EMS was a touch less responsive, since they're volunteer and have to come from home to collect equipment and respond, but she was down too long. I know AED's, I've received provider level ACLS training in the military, if an AED doesn't suggest a shock in a couple of cycles of CPR, it's very much not good. When the EMT-P finally arrived, around 20 minutes after the ambulance arrived, the scope told the story. I managed to not get sick until most had departed and only the officers remained. But, I've watched them help the homeless, even to the point of bringing food and water to them. And I'm damned sure they'd be calling parents, rather than confiscating cars for something like this. Which is tax money very well invested, rather than simply spent. The Chief is simply justifying his revenue generation. I'm known to rev my engine to warm the car up a touch faster, so I can melt ice coating my glass. Cite me, enjoy me turning the thing into a federal case level defense and litigation that'll tie up legal for decades, just on spite. I did do donuts on snow as a kid. I also did donuts on a street once, the damned accelerator dropped to the floor and stayed there, donuting the way and literally burning out the brakes, while shutting off the engine ended that mess. It was a company vehicle and the mechanic and I had quite an exchange that took the shop steward to break up before I bent a tire iron around his empty head... I went over the vehicle with a fine tooth comb every time that idiot touched the vehicle after that! @Steve, I defy you to make a Yugo tires smoke. :P:p:P:p:P:p Even at 18, if you want my tires to smoke, you'd have to set fire to them. Tires never have been cheap! Wanna interest me, show me power and acceleration. I'm more into power, tow the Grand Coulee Dam and I'll be impressed. ;)
    2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364.  @sparkzbarca  airports are physical locations, websites are routed, by definition by IP address and don't have a physical location in that one can move a website by moving its files to a geographically distant server and update the DNS record. So, I can have a website that's physically in the US today and by COB, have it seamlessly in Taiwan. When referring to the domain name, that is merely a DNS reference and the DNS server, beyond the top level domain be anywhere in the world. Literally, for a US ISP to restrict my domain name, they either have purchase a server that redirects traffic by domain name, violating the heart of the agreements that are backed by ratified treaty and potentially interfering with valid traffic. Name any law that states that a company or individual must purchase a specific device, costing anywhere from $5k to $100k to satisfy a court case that they're not a participant in? That's literally like saying that Pennsylvania must not allow motor vehicle or air traffic to Miami, Florida and only Miami, Florida originate in the state and has to build a specific highway to accomplish that task. The only way to fully comply is to deny all traffic and shut down. So, a company that owns guide.tv is denied traffic because of two IP address resolutions to that same top level domain? OK, how about we do the same with .com? By court order, the internet is hereby illegal is the essential effect. Your example perfects a digital attack upon a sovereign nation because of two individuals within that nation. Following that logic, we should have invaded Argentina when Nazis fled there after WWII and at a minimum, walled off the entire nation if we couldn't enter it legally. That's like banning red traffic lights by banning electricity nationwide. Or in my example, destroying I-95 to prevent traffic from Pennsylvania from getting to Miami, Florida and once realized there are other roads, destroying any road that can possibly get to Miami, Florida. The order is essentially unenforcable on its face, it requires excessive expenses, essentially punishing providers for no reason by forcing a major expense and literally, per your example, declares digital war upon a sovereign nation for objectively the most trivial of reasons.
    1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. There are commercial traps like what was described. It's designed to fire a 12 gauge shotgun blank toward the ground, originally intended to discourage animals, but also used to discourage trespassers. Harmless, save if it kicked up some dirt into the low crawling trespasser's eyes, put a live round in it and it'd likely explode - they're plastic or sheet metal and could then be considered a mine. I've also used old fashioned magic cubes and a thin pin to trip the snapper inside that actuates the bulb. Taped carefully to a fencepost, trip lines six inches inside and down, on two adjacent posts, whoever's coming over the fence will likely be looking into the bulb when it flashes. Their night vision would also be shot to hell and gone. Hear the idiot coming over the fence, hear the distinctive pop of the bulbs, going back over and trip and fall into the concrete outside of the fence, snicker like Muttley. Worked great for one doper, who for some odd reason, would come down the alley and shoot up in my yard, leaving his works behind and at the time, we had small kids. He left a blood trail from his shins meeting the retaining wall outside the fence that lead straight to his house. He didn't return. We also used the same thing in the Army to discourage infiltrators trying to scout our site. For the remote controlled device, that'd be referred to as command detonator and as far as I'm aware, remains untested in the legal system and usually is used with actual mines, like Claymore and other antipersonnel mines. Dunno if I'd want to test a prosecutor and court's Wheaties...
    1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. So, the use of force is acceptable to ensure that a summary offense, frequently addressed by mail, is acceptable. If the cop's out of pepper spray and doesn't have a taser, I guess he can use his M4 instead and shoot the suspect to death to serve that summary offense notice. And nukes should be allowed for citizens suing. Yeah, as in, what in the actual fuck, over?! God-cops need to be replaced, as god-cops seem to believe that courts of law do not need to exist, so it becomes a use of force game. And honestly, were I to witness that, those cops would be obstructed - permanently, as they escalate. Upside is, the economy would be slightly stimulated, as there'd be vacancies in the local god-cop force. And the undertaker would be fairly busy as well. Capital punishment and life in prison aren't much of a deterrent for those who are aged, militarily experienced and just out of fucks to give any longer. We just want peace and quiet and obedience to the laws and Constitution. Back in the formerly real world, refuse the summons, get served by mail again, ignore that and meet the constable who will forcibly escort one to court, by court order. No god-cops needed to Roy Bean shit and invite Range Wars. Excuse me while I check my nuke stockpile... Cool! Got a few left, all prominently marked and properly marked Chili with beans. I'll never lose in that contest, I'm US Army, REF. Retired, Extremely Flatulent. Seriously, we've a major problem when cops decide to be god and become punishers of pseudo-offenses. For then, the courts lose authority, law enforcement as well and we've just gone feudal. Literally. Now, excuse me while I go vomit.
    1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500.  @alanmcentee9457 how fascinating it is that for the first part, you stop and ignore the remainder, particularly the general welfare of the US, which previously was defined as We The People. Yet, when examining the second amendment, you parse the final part. It's as if you cherrypick what you want, ignore the remainder and just pervert that perversion into some odd damned fiction that meets reality in absolutely no imaginable way. Here's a hint, ever heard of a section 8 discharge from the military? Section 8 housing? All entitlements under section 8, entitlements being a fancy word for rights. The entirety of Section 8: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; To borrow Money on the credit of the United States; To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States; To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States; To establish Post Offices and post Roads; To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries; To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court; To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations; To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress; To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–And To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
    1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539.  @soup31314  OK, the US is being invaded. POTUS can't declare war, so he sits by idly waiting for Congress to come back into session and declare war and authorize hostilities. Great idea! The Big One hits California, the state is in ruins and burning, but the POTUS doesn't have the money or authority to send in help, see the above example of waiting for congress to come back into session to act. Those are emergencies and POTUS is authorized by law to issue emergency orders, as well as executive orders necessary in order to run the country in general. A real world example, beyond the GWOT, was FDR, who sent help to Pearl Harbor, despite not having the money issued by Congress to do so, but then asked Congress to declare war and authorize the funding of his response. Now, in this case, it's a copyright law case and like it or not, copyright law is a real thing and copyright law treaties are ratified treaties, to which the Constitution states simply, "Ratified treaties are the law of the land", making ratified treaties subservient only to the Constitution itself, which is ultimate in authority. The judge issued a default judgement, as the defendants didn't appear before the court and issued relief to the plaintiffs. I strongly suspect that the reporting is in error, as SDNY does not speak for the nation, as there are many, many other districts and 11 circuits. So, an order to remove the .com registration goes to Verisign, who owns that top level domain, who ignores the order, as they're under the 4th circuit, Eastern District of Virginia. For the .tv address, the people of the sovereign nation of Tuvulu would simply laugh and shake their heads in confusion over how a US district court could order another nation around without a means of enforcement and just go about their daily lives, as I highly doubt that the US Navy would even want to bother finding that island and enforce a court order that would be legally an unlawful order. ISP's in my home Commonwealth of Pennsylvania would simply circular file the order, as we're under the 3rd circuit, Central District of Pennsylvania and hence, not under the jurisdiction of SDNY. They could order their personnel to blackhole the domain, save that that violates an international treaty on the internet, would require them to acquire a blackhole server, pay someone to configure and install it, then pay someone to block that domain and hope like hell it doesn't block all traffic, destroying their business and hence, unenforceable.
    1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. Non Guccione began construction on a casino in Atlantic City, which left steelworks literally over the roof of the home of Vera Coking. When Trump purchased the failed project, he razed the girderwork mess, resulting in damage to her home, she refusing to allow his workers repair the home. An eminent domain battle ensued and she and two other property owners prevailed. Still trying to figure out how Guccione's erector set ended up hanging over her home, since that apparently is criminal trespass. Around a decade ago, a creditor of Trump's failed casino purchased her home after she moved to a retirement home in California for a little over half of her asking price that Trump refused and Guccione refused to pay, getting around $580k or so, her asking price being $1 million. The other property owners getting 2.1 million and 1.2 million. Drones may not overfly private property below a specific altitude, I remember that from when I was working at CSC, whose seniormost officers discussed licensing of drones with the FAA director, which became effective soon after and guess what company got to handle the registrations? No bribes, just golfing buddies, because buddies taking care of buddies with government contracts is OK. I've had to explain to friends in foreign lands about federal and state, given their nations (European, mostly) strong central governments. The easiest way I found was to consider the US a strong federation of 50 nations with one overarching supreme Constitution that significantly restricts the federal authorities of the national government over the states beyond that which is outlined within the Constitution. Given Eurozone, that got the concept across well enough. Special thanks to History News Network for the naming of the guilty: 'The first record of the anecdote appears in a 1787 journal kept by one of the delegates to the convention, James McHenry of Maryland. He wrote: “A lady asked Dr. Franklin Well Doctor what have we got a republic or a monarchy. A republic replied the Doctor if you can keep it.” McHenry added a footnote to the text: “The lady here alluded to was Mrs. Powel of Philad[elphi]a.”' Why Elizabeth Willing Powel was erased from the majority of tellings of the story is beyond me, unless perhaps, they wish to reject that republic. Given that she did play pivotal roles at the time of the penning of our Constitution and before, that's the only reason I can figure, unless some, women included, want to deny women the agency that they had at the time of our nation's founding.
    1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. A hospital gift card for malpractice? Naw, no thanks, I've always wanted to own a hospital and its employees. Chest pains, automatic O2 and ECG, ECG will tell the tale easily enough. At that point, if the person claims to be Jesus Christ, I don't discontinue treatment and restrain them, if I have reason to believe that they are not Jesus Christ, I schedule neurology to consult, not perform the medical equivalent of shooting at his head with a machine gun! I had transportation disconnect my O2 once for transport for imaging, turned out my lungs were partially collapsed, partially fluid filled, totally a bad scene. Mr Transportation then dutifully brought me back to the ED and utterly failed to reconnect my O2, leaving me on room air and SPO2 dropping to 80%. Doctor was decidedly irritated... Turned out to be minor, it was only heart failure secondary to a thyroid storm, triggering severe tachycardia and obscene hypertension. Got back on O2, sats jumped back into the upper 90's, where they remain today without supplementary O2. Was sure I knew how ugly it was, then the endocrinologist came by and suggested that if my BP and pulse don't approach survivable soon, they'd administer iodine. A large dose of iodine literally temporarily shuts down the thyroid gland's hormone production, which I knew, much to Doctor's surprise. Thinking that, they're into Hail Mary land. Thankfully, the propranolol and methimazole did their jobs and 3 1/2 days later, I walked out of the hospital. Oddly, never needing restraints, although I'm sure that the floor nursing staff was tempted once I was feeling better and began roaming the hallways out of sheer boredom (and well, to sneak out for a smoke (nearly made it, bad timing, as one of my nurses was coming in a bit early for her shift and spotted me 10 feet from the exit)). The nurse administrator of the unit laughed at my attempt, realizing that had I wanted to "escape", well, in conversation I gave her six patent egress points from the facility and every one of them was workable. ;)
    1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. This is a new technology, nothing like it existed before. It's not as if there were steel cases with a lock that is opened by selecting multiple numbers from multiple, oh, just spitballing here, directions turned on a dial. We could then call it a combination lock. All, to keep important things safe. Encryption is totally new, nobody has encoded information before, so ciphertext would be a total Enigma to anyone without the keys to decrypt the information. Totally novel, Caesar couldn't come up with a cipher at all! No, it took Lou Cipher to invent such devilishly clever things. For the security and cryptographically challenged, the first bit is about a safe. First used by Ramses II in the 13th century BC, although it was more a pin and tumbler lock. The Romans had combination locks for their safe boxes. A Muslim engineer came up with a much more modern combination lock for safe boxes in 1206 and the modern security safe hails back to 1850 or so. Enigma was an encryption system that baffled the Allies during much of WWII. While it could eventually be mathematically broken, changing the configuration of the machine would set the analyst teams back to square one for months to years - it was simpler to steal one from operational warships. Caesar cipher was an encryption scheme that's childish by today's standards, about as weak as ROT13 "coding", which is just subtract 13 from the ASCII symbol value to decrypt. If you missed Lucifer, that's OK, I'm sure Lucifer misses you too. ;) It's literally the same issue as demanding the combination to your safe. I ran into some annoyances while traveling on duty, once to the point where I called a phone number, reported the issue and the TSA agent's phone rang within two minutes and he wished that he followed my advice to wear hearing protection when answering. The computer had a nice red sticker on it, with white letters with the cryptically ill informing SECRET on it and he was ignoring my classified documents courier card - until that phone rang. Once he saw and I related that it was classified and showed my courier card, the most he was allowed to do by law was to document and report the contact, prohibited by law: Demanding access to something you have no need to know the contents of. Misuse of that trust gets the abuser's security clearance revoked for cause, with potential criminal penalties attached for good measure. A total meteoric end to one's career.
    1
  696. 1
  697.  @kenbrown2808  my response would be, "The jurist in this matter is respectfully and cordially invited to pound sand up his ass until the end of time, as the Middle District of Pennsylvania is not the slave of the Southern District of New York and the costs involved would both destroy the global internet, which is against international law and ratified treaties, as well as be sufficient to bankrupt any nation attempting to usurp such control, as only the People's Republic of China has a firewall capable of such a feat". Not my district, not my wheelhouse, not my domain and entirely not my problem. I am not under their circuit or district, so the orders are irrelevant. I am not the global god of the internet throughout the world, so it's a big nope. I don't control the 1589 top level domain controllers that are scattered across the globe, so hell no. I'm under the 3rd circuit, they are under the 2nd circuit, so bye-bye. And even were I under their jurisdiction, services ordered that are involuntary and unpaid is slavery, which is unconstitutional. .tv is a top level domain, as is .com.The TLD .tv is owned by the island nation of Tuvalu, which is decidedly outside of any US court of law. The TLD .com is owned by Verisign, which is headquartered in Reston, VA. Reston, VA is under the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which is under the fourth circuit. Frankly, it looks like the reporter screwed up the jurisdiction of the court, the authority of the court and the impracticality of compliance with the order, unless the jurist is directing the US to go to war with Tuvulu, which is laughable. Lord, save us from tech correspondents reporting on the law and law correspondents reporting on tech, for they always turn the story into a pig's breakfast!
    1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. Lemme get this straight, the jurist was unaware of who was inside of the jury box and entirely unaware of the shiny steel bracelets with their shiny linking chain? That sounds like a serious, life threatening emergency, as the jurist is decidedly not awake, aware and oriented times 3. Still, I'd apologize and rightfully earn a contempt citation, "I apologize your Honor, I really need to watch my frigging mouth and shit, there might be some fucking cunt around". Given her inappropriate action that engenders serious doubt in granting faith and credit to the judiciousness and wisdom of the judiciary. I'd likely also have to apologize for breaking her bailiff... Questions to answer, is the jurist responsible for activities in the hallway that fall outside of the case under her jurisprudence? When did the first amendment get repealed? Oh, that non-apology is me being nice, but thoroughly irritated. I'm more than capable of making Saint Peter go into a tirade of profanity previously unheard by any ears - right in front of the throne. I've literally gotten a nun to curse while standing on the church altar. She was promptly caused to retire, which was my goal, due to her abuses to students. Now, an appropriate action on the jurist's part would be to state her offense to a statement, then strongly suggest an apology. I've ate crow pie the size of Texas, when approached that way. I then blamed it on its actual cause, intracranial flatulence. Cole's slaw: thinly sliced cabbage. :P Broken bailiffs: for when just leaving them badly bent just won't suffice. Left with their shoelaces tied together works quite well - as long as they don't notice you doing it.
    1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1