Comments by "Stephen Villano" (@spvillano) on "NowThis Impact"
channel.
-
233
-
19
-
These children would be unlikely to care for me and I most certainly was not a Trump voter.
But, we have laws and our most supreme set of laws is our Constitution, which places ratified treaties being "the law of the land" and we did ratify the refugee and asylum treaties.
Which we're feloniously ignoring. Both, by ignoring the ratified treaties, which are subordinate only to the Constitution itself and the accompanying Acts of Congress, which are codified laws.
So, either we have a Constitutional system that we follow or we don't. If we do, these children and parents should be rushed through the asylum process yesterday. If we don't, we don't have a President or Congress, so why is anyone listening to anything they say?
For then, our Constitution has no power to enforce treaties or laws and as such, we're an anarchy, no laws at all.
14
-
6
-
@petersayatshkin7454 you obviously failed to learn the tradition and cultural requirement of hospitality.
If you're feeding someone, they're a guest, to be fed, given proper accommodations, even if you and your family are put out a fair amount, allowed to bathe (that's actually pretty much #2, #1 being giving them water, then food, doing without to feed them if necessary) and the best sleeping arrangements possible, even if you sleep on the floor as master of the house.
Understanding the cultural foundation is actually important to understanding biblical requirements. And all of the above are part of the 613 commandments. Indeed, interwoven among them.
Which is why I'll always feel safer in a Jewish or Muslim home as a guest than in your home and I abide by neither faith, but find honorable traditions and points of behavioral requirements that I find peer worthy.
You, not so much, per your own written words, odd, as you qualify them by calling yourself disgusting. Why?
3
-
2
-
@realaudioreviews they're seeking asylum, following a ratified treaty that the US ratified, swearing to honor and now is no longer doing so.
FYI, the US Constitution states clearly, "Ratified treaties are the law of the land", meaning such treaties are equal and even superior to Acts of Congress and subordinate only to the Constitution itself, which is supreme and may not be overridden ever, by anyone, save via a Constitutional amendment, agreed to by 2/3 of Congress and 3/4 of the states.
So, you argue for lawlessness, ignoring the Constitution, laws, treaties, customs, mores, just to satisfy some atavistic notion that you're superior to what I flushed down the toilet this morning.
No, you're only equal and should also be flushed.
2
-
Nah, cite her with contempt of court, due to the weakness of her arguments at that specific level, order she sleep on a concrete floor, with a mylar blanket, lights on, prison AC set to cool, if she complains, make it colder, release to her home, to appear within the hour of release, during morning rush hour traffic and guards are ordered to deny her sleep for the three days confinement.
All perfectly legal for a superior court to order, so that the attorney arguing such weak tea to prove personally to the court. Also, essentially a death sentence.
2
-
1
-
1