Comments by "Thor Nado" (@ThorNado24) on "Al Jazeera English" channel.

  1. That means there will be no death after they move to another location.
    5
  2. Taiwan was not part of 1947 ROC constitution. At that time, Taiwan was still legally part of Japan momentarily under the trustee of the US before the Japan-Allies 1952 treaty.
    4
  3.  @greatsky8226  Don't you realize that Taiwan state existed 1648 before the country of China (1912). Before China, it was Qing country by the Machurian colonizers. And the current Chinese government started only in 1949. So, everything is a lie from the Chinese government.
    4
  4. These students don't know what Islam is all about. Too naive.
    4
  5. No legal basis so it is a false claim.
    4
  6.  @waynegore5291  You are assuming. Not a single article that state Taiwan is a province/territory of China.
    3
  7. You fail to mention Taiwan itself and not China's ROC government only. Before the coming of ROC refugees from China in 1949, Taiwan was already Japanized after 50 years being one country with Japan. After the end of world war II, Taiwan was freed and gained outright independence from Japan after the 1951 treaty. That was the basis of status quo.
    2
  8. Free from Hamas and Islam.
    2
  9. That's already 75 years had passed since Taiwan became independent from Japan while China keeps trying.
    2
  10.  dech8220  Only 2 war troubles in the world now. 1. ISLAM (EVERYWHERE) 2. DICTATOR (RUSSIA- PUTIN, MYANMAR)
    2
  11. And they purposely forget the Hamas massacre of innocents.
    1
  12.  @yeah_i_likeCartoons  You prove my point.
    1
  13. Hasan talks about freedom when Islam is the same as comies without freedom.
    1
  14. Fire is a way to drive squatters away.
    1
  15.  @waynegore5291  repeating a claim without a single proof is insisting a lie to turn true. Adding insult doesnt help, it does expose the lie.
    1
  16.  @fanghe-z1j  You wrongly quoted fromMainland affairs council. That's not the constitution. The original 1947 Nanjing constitution cannot be altered. Search and learn.
    1
  17.  @fanghe-z1j  Consensus did not exist as confirmed by Taiwan ex-president Lee. It was merely verbal talk and because KMT and CCP did not agree the one-China interpretation so there was no consensus. MaYinJiu was Xi's yes man and his own party disowned for talking against the party and the candidate policy goal. Taiwanese called him a traitor and his support is less than 5% same support with China's one-sided unification by force.
    1
  18.  @fanghe-z1j  Let it be factual as evidence. So you proved that a)1947 Nanjing constitution was for China only as Taiwan was a Japanese country since 1895 until 1951 peace treaty. b) There was no written 1992 consensus because it's CCP's propaganda claim and KMT verbal counter claim of different interpretation. If no agreement then there was no consensus. Facts don't lie.
    1
  19.  @fanghe-z1j  Taiwanese people are still reconnecting the Taiwan history which had been set aside for years as the effect of military dictatorship. You also don't know the true history of China because you learn only what CCP told you>
    1
  20.  @steventruong9124  The 1947 ROC constitution did not include Taiwan because it was still a territory of Japan before 1951 peace treaty. Yes, it cannot be altered that's why ROC has the right to rake back China but PROC proclaimed in 1949 (Taiwan was still part of Japan) only claimed the territory of China by force. So, PROC's claim on Taiwan is illegal but ROC right on China remains unaltered.
    1
  21.  @steventruong9124  Under the international law, the official document is based on 1951 peace treaty.
    1
  22.  @steventruong9124  Yes, Chiang occupied Taiwan in 1949 as proxy of the USA, the occupying military government of all Japanese territories including Taiwan before the 1951 treaty.
    1
  23.  @steventruong9124  Not true. Officially, Manchu Qing was also a colonizer of China. Taiwan was official annexed as part Qing in 1887 to 1895 which meant Qing had two colonies, China and Taiwan (only for 8 years despite not ruling the entire island). It was Japan which united the entire Taiwan as one central government for 50 years. So given the historical claim, Japan has more right than Qing (not China).
    1
  24.  @concertmaster  1. "The fact that Taiwan was returned to China is a key part of the post-WWII international order. So historically, legally, and politically, Taiwan undoubtedly belongs to China." That is not a fact but a big lie. No such document. No evidence. Pure illegal claim promoted by commies false propaganda and disinformation. 2. "The claim that "Taiwan has never been a part of China" and that it belongs to Japan is completely false and has no factual or legal basis." That's not a just a claim but a documented facts. China and Japan signed the 1895 treaty for China to stay away from Taiwan permanently and forever without any chance of return. Read the treaty articles. 3. Taiwan became an independent territory after 1951 Japan treaty by fact. Read the treaty. PRC-China has nothing to prove on constant lies. So the option of invasion is a indication of a aggression and banditry, a capital crime against humanity.
    1
  25. 这和是不是中国人没有关系。从历史事实看，按照国际法和国内法，台湾作为主权国家已经有70多年了。 中国最好的选择是帮助台湾成为联合国和其他国际组织的成员。
    1
  26.  @fuselane  是的，国家之间的和平条约被视为国际法规定的法律文书。 你呢？我敢打赌你什么都不知道，因为你被洗脑去遵守共产主义主人的规则。
    1
  27.  @greatsky8226  My comments are based on documented facts.
    1
  28.  @greatsky8226  You don't even know how to spell Cairo and how dare to say intelligence. funny low. There is nothing about Cairo. In fact, it did not exist. Perhaps what's spreading is a big lie.
    1
  29.  @greatsky8226  Kairo Declaration does not exist meaning it's a lie.
    1
  30.  @danganrompa2626  The Dutch called the place Taiwan referring to the local tribe people.
    1
  31.  @danganrompa2626  The first president of RoC was the founder of country China with territories officially inherited from Qing country.
    1
  32.  @danganrompa2626  RoC is the official representative government of Taiwan. RoC has a historical claim to rule the stolen China territory again.
    1
  33.  @danganrompa2626  There is no existing Cairo declaration signed document. Don't be confused with an unknown source of press release.
    1
  34.  @jennifermccaughey-fz9gx  The goal of Hamas and other jihad groups there are from their religious belief of 72 virgins reward in jannah.
    1
  35.  @jennifermccaughey-fz9gx  It is. The goal is from what written's in their scriptures.
    1
  36.  @flopoz2575  When under martial law, civilian rule is suspended.After martial is lifted, the civilian rule is backed That's what happened in Taiwan. However, Communist government is a civilian rule under one-party who basically owns the country. It will remain forever unless, Chinese people do differently .
    1
  37.  @bobcharles7716  He just wants to rule. Bandit respect no laws.
    1
  38.  @albertleung5823  you are assuming or plainly ignorant. Did you ever read that resolution? I bet Taiwan was not there.
    1
  39.  @rimiko86  wrong. It's below 3% that people doesn't want anything about China.
    1
  40. Wrong. Chinese people in the mainland deserve a government directly elected by the people themselves. So, RoC (pioneer and founding government of China) should be the better government.
    1
  41.  @tonynunez6539  Hamas amassed plenty of money for happy new year.
    1
  42.  @mastertrend4685  No. The 1947 RoC original constitution was for China only while Taiwan was legally sill a Japanese territory under the US trustee. According to the constitution, the territories cannot be altered. The current RoC government is according to the additional articles outside the original constitution specific for Taiwanese government.
    1
  43.  @jameselliott216  PRC president for China and RoC president for Taiwan. Two different countries with two different governments.
    1
  44.  @davidwong5197  RoC's constitution additional articles are specific to Taiwan. RoC;s original constitution was for China, the lost territory to be ruled again. That's the domestic law of RoC.
    1