Comments by "Aleksa Žunjić" (@aleksazunjic9672) on "Analyzing a modern fascist book "Socialism of Duty"" video.

One of the most interesting intellectuals of 20th century. Not for everyone of course (low IQ crowd) . His book "Ride the Tiger: A Survival Manual for the Aristocrats of the Soul" is a must read for anyone living in these times of glorified stupidity.
25
Humans are collective beings. There is no denial of that. At the same time, humans are not drones. Natural philosophy must embrace both sides. Thus, third position is both collectivistic and individualistic. Thesis and anti-thesis creating synthesis.
16
Third position correctly predicted fall of capitalism (which we witness today) , but it also did not want to subjugate their nations to Zio rule trough communism. Thus, third position as national socialism does seek some kind of compromise in economic sphere.
10
@christopheryoder8292 Capitalism is currently in the process of downfall. Maybe not as Marx expected, but still - monetary means in the hands of selected "elite" (with certain ethnic background 😁), thus they push their own agenda no matter the popular opinion (homosexual agenda, antinatalism, feminism, anti-White agenda etc ... ) or even natural laws. Weak states, laws respected only because of fear (and even that fear is diminishing) , egotism as the main virtue. Capitalism is dead end, thus even those elites enriched by it are preparing humanity for "new order" with lockdowns, curbed free speech, controlled money transactions etc .
10
Really ? Ours is not to reason why; ours is but to do and die 😁
9
@MSP_TechLab Actually, cannon fodder was invented by the French and British. In pre-Napoleonic times, you had first line of soldiers that was to be sacrificed "to cannons" in order for others to pass. Russian traditional way of fighting is to trade space in order to conserve army. Thus, for example, Russian losses were several times lower than French in 1812 invasion.
8
For a country like Argentina (mixed-race society, large inequality in abilities) ... some kind of populist fascism is the best system. It would give large masses some bread and circus, while ensuring stability for more gifted parts of society.
5
@johnwolf2829 They actually did at certain places. Unsurprisingly, they got support of local population. Main mistake of Germans was discounting of Slavs as Untermensch, although in reality genetic makeup of Russians and Germans is not so different. Of course, they did not know that in 1940s.
5
@johnwolf2829 Well, Germans had decent chance to win in 1941. With somewhat better attitude towards population, they could have pulled trough. What is worst for them, Russian population was so docile that even abolishing hated collective farms (and bragging about it) would have tremendous effect.
4
Maybe your masters do not want you to learn 😝
4
@MSP_TechLab Soviet model was aberration, perhaps because founder of the Red Army was Trotsky of a distinctively different ethnic background than Russians. Interestingly enough, Russia now reverted to their traditional model of conserving troops, while Ukrainians retained Soviet model, sacrificing manpower in fruitless assaults. After all, you have 300-500 000 Ukrainian dead, and 30-40 000 Russian dead, more than 10:1. Perhaps because Zelensky has same ethnic background as Trotsky 😁
3
@MSP_TechLab Truth hurts, my little disposable Zio bot. You would not understand it, tho.
3
@jeremym4451 Nope. It mostly depends on environment. Collectivism is generally stronger if environment is harsh so people need to band together to survive. If environment permits individualism then you have it.
3
@aranos6269 No, it is not. Never existed. You exchange what you can for what they give you. Large capital dictates the prices of everything .
2
@gghost1224 Germans were partially pragmatic on the matter, so they invented all kinds of theories (Croats were descendants of Goths, Slovaks were partially German etc ...) But main Slavic groups, especially Russians as largest Slavic nation, were threated badly. There was no hint of Russian state, even puppet state like Croatia or Slovakia. Thus, for Russians it became war for survival, and that war Germans could not win.
2
@raumfahreturschutze This is the prevalent thinking in Western armies , especially US armed forces. You have mercenaries under contract to obey orders. They would be sent all over the world to kill and die if necessary, without questioning said orders.
1
@Dario-uj6qo It does not, it has some kind of liberal democracy mixed with populism. Cuba on the other hand has fewer resources than Argentina, but it is in better shape in certain areas (healthcare, security on the streets, education ...) . For Argentina some kind of fascism would be optimal solution, as it would at least give more gifted parts of population some chance in life. For the masses bread & circus is best they could expect, considering their worth.
1
@Dario-uj6qo Not really. Fascism is not democratic in a modern sense that everybody above certain age has an equal right to vote. Fascism is democratic in a sense that humans are naturally divided between leaders and followers, and people as a whole (greater than sum of its parts) subconsciously wants such system of government. Cubans living in US, spitting on their own country, are by definition traitors. Traitors are sometimes useful but never respected, thus I really do not care much what they have to say. Worthy part of the people - people with higher IQ, willing to accomplish something, not for themselves but for humanity as a whole.
1
@Dario-uj6qo Not a democracy in modern sense. Anyway, badmouthing your native country from affair, serving those who did harm your people (Americans in this case) is a sign of lack of character. It is like badmouthing your parents in front of enemies of your family. People like that rarely achieve anything. At best they earn some kind of nice livelihood for themselves, even that would not last. Traitors are sometimes useful, but never respected.
1
@Dario-uj6qo Americans supported tin-pot dictatorship of Batista, effectively turning Cuba into banana-republic and colony of US. Thus they created conditions for the rise of Castro, and when that happened introduced sanctions aimed primarily against population. Thus, Cuba remain to be poorer than it could be if left alone. Flying from your own country, going to the enemy that made it miserable in the first place, and on top of that badmouthing it ... what could you say about people like that except they are scum .
1
@Dario-uj6qo Americans elect their politicians, or are you clamming that US is not a democracy 😁 US policies towards Cuba directly influenced rise of Castro, and subsequent sanctions did make Cuba much poorer. These are simple facts. US is enemy not of Cuban government, but of Cuban people, because US policies directly harm that people. Therefore, someone for Cuba going to US and badmouthing his own country from there is simply a scumbag. Like it or not. Cuban emigrating to lets say Brazil, China or Russia, and criticizing Cuban government from there could be excused. But going over to the enemy is simply despicable.
1
@jeremym4451 Historically speaking, families would create villages and (small) tribes. More collectivistic or more individualistic largely depended on local environment, i.e. would you better survive in the tighter community or not.
1
There is no such thing as "pure capitalism" . Unbridled capitalism simply leads to monopolistic society, something we now have in US (controlled by certain ethnic group 😁) . Pure capitalism and free markets are simply fictions, just like classless society of communists.
1
Well, this would be forbidden because it would sway many to investigate further into these ideas.
1
Individualists achieve nothing. For a man as an individual, everything starts and ends with him. Thus, he only cares for personal power and pleasure, no matter the costs. This leads to egotism which finally destroys civilizations, as we could see in modern West.
1
@elLooto To write that code somebody has to make computer, with all its complicated parts. Somebody has to invented electricity, and somebody has to create programming language. Think about it, you mighty individual 😁
1
@elLooto All of this things are made by human collective, like it or not. None of it could be produced by individual, and individual living alone would not even have much use from them.
1
Main difference between communists and fascists are their masters. Communists are for the most part simply Zio slaves. There are some exceptions, like for example national-bolsheviks, but for the most part communist deny biological realties. Fascism, at least in modern times, heavily relies on genetics, and is of course in a struggle against Zio enslavement.
1