Comments by "Aleksa Žunjić" (@aleksazunjic9672) on "Hitler WASN’T funded into power by the capitalists" video.

  1. Well, in Soviet union if you had a garden and small patch you were considered to be kulak 😁
    66
  2. In economic terms, Hitler was closest to modern social-democrats. He did not trust big capital (rightfully so, as we can see from modern society) , but he was not against private initiative like communists. Overall, economic model was secondary to him, main thing was racial question. He believed that if you have racially strong people, they will build economy in one way or other.
    32
  3.  @RadCirskis  No, it is a evidence that definitions like "capitalist" could be very ... fluid :)
    4
  4.  @GenocideWesterners  This happened after terrible loses in WW2, and before that during Stalin's roaring thirties 😁
    4
  5.  @Dario-uj6qo  TIK is wrong. Big business did comparatively well until the bombings and later Soviet expropriations. In Western Germany, almost all companies that we know today were successful during Third Reich.
    2
  6. Hitler never denied he was a socialist. But, he was not a communist, in economic terms he was close to modern social-democrats.
    1
  7.  @hananokuni2580  In purely economic terms, he did not push for total state control of means of production (like in USSR) . It is unlikely Third Reich would abolish private ownership of factories (for example). But, he did create workers councils and did have state representatives in large private companies. This, btw, happened in US and UK during the war, as state directed what will be produced. Overall, as I said, Hitler was close to modern social-democrats in economic terms. His core beliefs were racial , not national in modern sense, although he called his party like that. Simply, strong Volk, with pure Aryan blood, would find a way to create strong society and economy.
    1