Comments by "Aleksa Žunjić" (@aleksazunjic9672) on "Desperate historians try to defend the Nazi "privatization" myth" video.

@TheImperatorKnight Why is it so hard for you to understand that from economic standpoint Hitler was neither pure socialist nor pure capitalist ? 😁He was closest to modern social-democrats and often drifted to the "left" or "right" as situation demanded. Economic policy was secondary to him, racial question was most important.
15
@projectnemesi5950 I did not say they were mutually exclusive. I said that Hitler (and National-Socialists in general) considered economic ideology as secondary issue. I.e. , for then, if you have genetically superior populace, it would fine the way to organize economy providing it had living space. Thus, they were most concerned with conquest, not with "pure" socialism or capitalism.
5
@XHitsugaX Well, nope. Actually centrist tend to do that what you described. Anyway , Hitler was not a fascist, he was National Socialist and there are differences. Especially concerning racial question, which was most important for Hitler.
5
@spardasquadspqr3535 Full Jews (Geltungsjude) did not serve in Wehrmacht (they were non-citizens). Mischlinge of first degree would sometime serve, but as a rule they would be conscripted in Organization Todt. Mischlinge of the second degree would serve in Wehrmacht.
4
@XHitsugaX Nope. Difference between Fascists and National Socialists was primarily in racial question, i.e Fascist initially accepted people from all races .
2
@projectnemesi5950 You do not need magical insight, it is enough to read Mein Kampf :D Hitler mentions economy a lot, but his primary idea throughout the book is Blood and Soil, i.e. having a pure blooded German people and enough of "living space" for that people. He specifically refutes the idea that German economic problems could be resolved trough industrialization and inner colonization.
1