Comments by "Aleksa Žunjić" (@aleksazunjic9672) on "Why did Hitler hire and fire Schacht?" video.

@TheImperatorKnight Socialists try to portray Hitler as a tool of capitalists, free market fanatics (like you TIK :P ) try to portray him as a socialist , but he was neither. Simply saying, In economic terms Hitler kept somewhere in the middle, and didn't have ideological problems of sometimes moving closer to capitalism and sometimes to socialism. Why ? Because Hitler did not consider economy as a heart of his ideology (that place was taken by biology, i.e. race problem) . And Hitler kept this middle road until the war started, and then gradually switched to total command economy, but other countries did that too, even US.
37
@ZoranZoltanous You are burdening yourself with trifles :D Hitler was not interested in any pure economic model, be it corporatism, capitalism, socialism etc ... He simply wanted Lebensraum for his Volk . Economy was just a tool, but his core belief was that if he had strong, Aryan, pure blooded people, such people would build its own civilization and society including economy. In economic terms, his primary concern was to build strong industry that could support his armies, but at the same time not to overburden people with hardship in order to avoid mutinies and revolutions of 1918. Therefore, until the war started, Hitler was moving sometimes towards socialism, sometimes toward capitalism, seemingly haphazardly . In fact, he didn't care . All he wanted was to built up Wehrmacht and prepare for war as best he could.
12
You must admire TIK : how he gets from Hitler sacking Schacht to his crazy ideas that races and nations do not exist ;)
5
@colder5465 Well, of course, this is a bollocks. In reality, considering German workers, Hitler was moderate socialist, close to modern social-democrats. As for slave labor, if you do not regard someone as a human, slavery is logical. Of course, slavery was used by both socialists and capitalists, even before Hitler got to the power.
1