Comments by "Aleksa Žunjić" (@aleksazunjic9672) on "Was Hitler a British Agent?" video.

  1. Book is full of outlandish claims, but some things are true. For example about foreign backing of NSDAP early in its existence. I guess they deliberately make such books in order for people to "throw baby with the water", i.e. to not believe those tiny pieces of truth alongside with lies
    6
  2.  @KameradVonTurnip  No he did not. He just dismissed everything outright because it does not fit in his narrative. That is why he selected this silly book as straw dog, instead of doing research on the matter (from Hitler's origins to his finances early on) himself.
    5
  3. Book is full of outlandish claims, but some things are true. For example about foreign backing of NSDAP early in its existence. I guess they deliberately make such books in order for people to "throw baby with the water", i.e. to not believe those tiny pieces of truth alongside with lies.
    4
  4.  @josephahner3031  Agreed. And best way to discredit the truth is to mix it in with bunch of obvious lies.
    4
  5. Book is full of outlandish claims, but some things are true. For example about foreign backing of NSDAP early in its existence. I guess they deliberately make such books in order for people to "throw baby with the water", i.e. to not believe those tiny pieces of truth alongside with lies.
    2
  6.  @UndergroundDev  Search US donations to Hitler and British donations to Hitler. But don't use google, they censor stuff. Bing is fine or some other search engine. You will find some interesting stuff.
    2
  7.  @peterschattmann8298  Keep drinking kool aid. It is good for your complexion.
    1
  8.  @danielch6662  That is official history. But there are lots of other things that remain murky about Hitler and NSDAP, especially in early years.
    1
  9.  Simon Archbold  Partially true, but Bing has fewer users, so Microsoft does not bother to censor that much.
    1
  10. Actually, it is quite possible for someone to be a Catholic and a Jew at the same time. First is a religion and second is ethnicity (or a nation if you will) . And there were a lot of such persons, especially in Austria-Hungary in late 19th and early 20th century.
    1