Comments by "" (@monkeybusiness1999) on "Nikki Haleys Infidelities Aren't Really Meaningful: Her Warmongering Is" video.

  1. Completely agree with you. If she'll skrew her husband over & mess up her children's minds, repeatedly, imagine what she'd do to a distant public.
    5
  2. @TheSpartan3669 Haley has been in politics since 2004 as a trusted public representative & servant. With her planned future political goals ahead, she should've known better. Trump was a private citizen & in politics since only 2016. As far as I care, they can both love-on cucumbers & lettuce heads in their non-political private lives. But once they swear to uphold public office, with honesty & dignity, any dirty crud they wallow in afterward is open for criticism & concern. Because they now have the power to abuse power. (Luckily, Trump didn't do that while President. Haley, we don't know yet. But her thirst for overseas war involvement is telling. She appears to want to roll with the big boys - figuratively & literally.)
    2
  3. @TheSpartan3669  Actually, you're right - I did backtrack (it's not wrong to do that, btw) after reading about a half dozen articles about both Haley's & Trump's indiscretions. There was a difference in the accusations. Haley had two men who signed affidavits swearing she had affairs with them. Trump had verbal accusations, notably M.Maples. Which I remembered. However Maple's case involved money & silence; prenup issues. A little shaky. Regardless, I don't condone either of their behavior, & I still agree that it can overflow into disregard for public trust. However - the accuser has to show more than verbal arguments to prove their case. Trump denied the affair; Maples didn't. Which one is lying? IDK. Do you? You're biased too - if you automatically say it's Trump. I'm biased if I say Maples. You have to remember, many people have been caught making up lies about Trump to wreck his political career. eg Hotel Russia, for one. So, a rational person is going stay silent, neutral or even defend Trump, unless somebody comes up with some solid evidence of wrongdoing. Unfortunately, when a woman (or man) accepts money in lieu of speaking-up about someone doing something bad to them, it erodes her credibility. (And if Trump was skrew ing around while married, no, I don't respect that or him. It's an awful thing to do to your spouse.) (Also, I see that you've been commenting the same to many on YT. So your Trump bias is very clear. I also think I may know who you are. Otherwise, I wouldn't have wasted time conversing with you. Troll on... 😑👌)
    1
  4. If she'll skrew her husband over & mess up her children's minds, repeatedly, imagine what she'd do to the US public, given the power.
    1