Comments by "MrJoecool9999" (@MrJoecool9999) on "Shattered Lives: McGregor civil trial day 3" video.

To my mind its fairly simple - if she went to the hotel room willingly without being dragged or carried to it - then she put herself in the position that if sex were to take place - it is impossible to say for definite whether it was or wasn't consensual - and if the principal of innocent unless proven guilty is applied - then the jury has to find him not guilty...! There are a couple of obvious reasons why she might possibly lie about this - 1) Money 2) Guilt over having betrayed her boyfirend - and he may have found out from a 3rd party 3) Regret because she didn't like the sex she consented to as it left her injured BTW - McGregor is a character I do not like - regardless of his MMA success - and I am a fan of the UFC - but to convict him and classify him as a rapist in this case just doesn't seem just....!
11
@jakelongstaff4102 Well if you willingly go into a mans bedroom under the influence of alcohol/drugs and when inhibitions would/could be much lower - that's completely different from someone getting grabbed on their way home and dragged into an alleyway - the circumstances in which sex takes place does matter and this is likely why there was no criminal prosecution - which goes back to what I said earlier - it's a case of "She said" vs "He said" - so the principal of Innocent until Proven guilty should apply = Not Guilty....!
2
@jakelongstaff4102 That is not my "logic" and not what I said - read the post again...!
1
@jakelongstaff4102 Not so - either the jury believe he raped her going by the evidence put before them - or they do not believe her - the same as a criminal trial except for the standards of proof are lower - which begs the question - why do they even allow a civil case if there was no criminal prosecution.....! And I believe Conor McGregors teeth are quite safe...!
1