Comments by "E F" (@ef2718) on "DW News" channel.

  1. The fight is about the fine balance of power between the supreme court of justice and the acting government. Either side, the one in favor of a reform and the side opposing the judicial reform, can claim their position improves democracy.
    5
  2. " Completely removing checks and balances" ??? Stick to biology.
    4
  3.  @WildReefer  " does the UK also have the Supreme Court opine upon whether a piece of legislation is "reasonable" or not, regardless of the constitution?" No, it definitely does not.
    4
  4. Same as with Brexit. Millions of experts...
    4
  5. Some stand for their freedom to vote and have their elected representatives legislate per the will of the people who voted for them. Other stand for the freedom of judges of the supreme court of justice to cancel legislation acts of the elected representatives according to the "reasonable judgement" of supreme court judges.
    4
  6. Because Israel does not have a legislated mechanism of conducting a referendum.
    4
  7. except for Knesset parties elections.
    4
  8.  @exelrode  boycotting means abstaining which allows them to say in the future they did not vote against it.
    4
  9.  @SpazzyMcGee1337  same as they could last week.
    3
  10. Unless it is already involved....
    3
  11.  @exelrode  Some the political leaders who pushed for the boycott were in favor of the reform in past years, boycotting allows them to play both sides.
    3
  12. Forever correct, question is how relevant is it to the current debate, only future will tell.
    3
  13. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration.
    2
  14. The supreme court of Israel is subject to less restrictions than the supreme court of the USA and is much more active.
    2
  15.  @TheGersh18  USA's interests in the middle east are Oil prices Oil prices Oil prices Weapons sales to rich oil producing countries without risking wars that will drive oil prices up Suez canal open for commerce Suez canal open for the 6th fleet Blocking Israeli weapon manufacturers from competing with US made. Blocking China Blocking Russia. Partial list The cost of the support is simply miniscule relative to the benefits to USA's economy.
    2
  16.  @darth3911  What east part of Israel?? That whole country is 60km across east west.
    2
  17. The "funding" is 4 BUS$ where the economy of Israel is 520 B US$ (2022 data). Israel could easily do without that "funding", however the cost of the support is simply miniscule relative to the benefits to USA's economy.
    2
  18.  @sicilianknicca_mickygreeneyes  "imperialistic" LOL a 60km wide empire You deserve a prize for the dumbest comment.
    2
  19. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration.
    2
  20. Sorry, but nonsense.
    2
  21.  @exelrode  Even more cynical is the fact that those political abstainers had suggested in the past extremer versions of the law they oppose today.
    2
  22. Not even close.
    2
  23. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration
    1
  24. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration
    1
  25. Funding/GDP= 4/540
    1
  26. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration. That's what all the fuss is about.
    1
  27. Best comment.
    1
  28. Neither does the UK has a constitution.
    1
  29.  @vaidphysics  The brothers who wanted them dead
    1
  30.  @TheGersh18  It does not matter who provides oil to the USA, the oil market is a global market of supply and demand. Lookup energy crisis of 1973, where an Arab Israeli war was used by oil producers as an excuse to create energy crisis that has cost billions to US economy.
    1
  31. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration.
    1
  32. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration.
    1
  33.  @darth3911  Appropriation of the title palestinians by Arabs started in 1966.
    1
  34. What makes Israel more of a theocracy than the UK?
    1
  35. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration.
    1
  36. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration
    1
  37. For numbers lookup: Wars and Casualties of the 20th and 21st Centuries Data collected by Piero Scaruffi.
    1
  38.  @crosstraffic187  This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration.
    1
  39.  @crow06warrior41  I don't think Brian disagrees with your post.
    1
  40.  @bumberClart1000  bent judge?
    1
  41.  @bumberClart1000  No, I don't. Bent judges in the supreme court? how are they bent? by whom?
    1
  42. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration.
    1
  43. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration
    1
  44. for numbers lookup Wars and Casualties of the 20th and 21st Centuries Data collected by Piero Scaruffi.
    1
  45. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration
    1
  46. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration.
    1
  47. This chapter discusses the rise of judicial activism in the jurisprudence of the Israeli Supreme Court during the 1980s and 1990s. Many scholars claim that the Court could be said to have been extremely activist. The Court dramatically expanded the scope of its standing doctrine. It drastically reduced the scope of issues considered non-justiciable. It made ‘the reasonableness test’ its main tool for reviewing the actions of the government and the state's public administration.
    1
  48. What has changed?
    1