Comments by "M R" (@emm_arr) on "Jeffrey Epstein: FBI launches investigation into death amid growing conspiracy theories" video.

  1. Ewww. You're lifting a smear from a smear merchant who does rape jokes. What's wrong wirh you?
    1
  2. Is Trump innocent?
    1
  3. Trump did both "business" and "pleasure" with him. So what?
    1
  4. "Clinton’s enemies all hang themselves" Do they? Sounds like a false claim to me. "News media needs to understand we are smart enough to see the patterns." Are you smart enough to see that humans see patterns whether or not they exist?
    1
  5.  @danletter9357  "at what point do you think I should see a pattern" Let's try that again. I said this: "humans see patterns whether or not they exist". Well?
    1
  6.  @danletter9357  Let's try that again. I said this: "humans see patterns whether or not they exist".
    1
  7.  @danletter9357  You clearly use good sources. The total must be about 69 now. Fnarr fnarr.
    1
  8.  @danletter9357  You can bump up tne headcount if you include a couple of genocides.
    1
  9. Or Trump is involved!?
    1
  10.  @nickdubbin2636  So what? None of that makes Trump innocent - of anything! "The media hate trump with a passion." No. You hate the Clintons "with a passion". Trump and Ep at parties he organised at Mar-a-Lago. I wonder what that was all about?!
    1
  11.  @nickdubbin2636  "trumps not innocent but he seems to get blamed for everything" Everything? That's a silly claim. "he's still president" That does not make him innocent - of anything!
    1
  12. "You mean the FBI that is owned by the Clintons? Ya ok." Good shitpost!
    1
  13. If the Trump rumours are true, then the kompromat could be very compromising indeed.
    1
  14. Ahem. Alleged kompromat!
    1
  15. "The moment they showed a clip from CNN, I turned this video off, as it immediately lost any credibility" How does that work?
    1
  16. Seen that same claim before.
    1
  17. "But why is this linked to Trump" That should be obvious. It looks like you seek to avoid understanding that.
    1
  18.  @Jojo.R.Chipelago  I did - before I replied to you. It looks like you seek to avoid understanding stuff here. Should I pretend otherwise?
    1
  19.  @Jojo.R.Chipelago  "You are not able to answer my question" I am - but I choose not to. "Maybe if you want to change peoples opinions on political incidents, you would clearly state the facts that they are unaware of." You are not here top have opinions changed - that's why you make NO EFFORT AT ALL! I see you. "Tell me why Donald Trump is Suspect, but neither Bill Clinton or the Duke of York are." I never said that! It looks like you go to some effort to avoid understanding stuff here.
    1