Comments by "M R" (@emm_arr) on "Highlights: The Channel 4 News #ClimateDebate - world's first party leaders' debate on the climate" video.

No Conservatives? How odd.
5
@agt155 If you went to a good school, you would know that science is self-correcting and that you made a poor point there.
2
@Anthony Mitchell He's a Putinbot. If Brexit ever happens, he'll reappear as some other BS persona. As it is, "Jason Devon" is about a silly as "Polly Petrograd".
2
No. Not right. Are you a genuine idiot or just someone choosing to act like one?
1
@agt155 If you went to a good school, you would know that science is self-correcting and that you made a poor point there. You would also not be misrepresenting that as "hysteria".
1
@dalecrocker3213 Still being a willing mug and still spending time not learning better. That is ;ots of effort and time you urinate away.
1
@agt155 Repeating manure does not make it true. Just think of all the time you've wasted here not learning.
1
James Smith You do sound like a blukipper.
1
@gary63693 Nope!
1
Obvious shitpost from an obvious slaphead.
1
@jasondevon481 No. You're the one doing this for the pay, not me.
1
It's very clear what you've been persuaded to think.
1
Whataboutery.
1
@onlygazza Still whataboutery.
1
@onlygazza Afraid? That might be how your mind works, but your point is still whataboutery. I could invent BS claims about you being afraid. Should I? You is dead afraid. You is scaredy cat. Good, eh? As for "cultish" - you just posted based on belief!
1
Us?
1
Possibly. Each time he's tried for leadership of his party, he's been rejected. This is a Gove issue - as always - and not a a C4 News one. Gove pulled a stunt here and you buy the Gove narrative: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/michael-gove-channel-4-climate-debate-boris-johnson-ice-general-election-a9226056.html
1
Each time Gove has tried for leadership of his party, he's been rejected. This is a Gove issue - as always - and not a a C4 News one.
1
Still, no shortage of rubbish to post, eh?
1
@acac7928 Nah - it's a stupid point.
1
@richard-gn3es You want constructive? Then lead by example. We all know in broad terms what is constructive here.
1
@richard-gn3es No. You didn't. "We all know in broad terms what is constructive here." Oh - constructive. "I'm simply here to make people realise different opinions are not stupid" I am well aware of that, but what you did was stupid - and not constructive. "perhaps a discussion would be useful" Perhaps - but you chose to post rubbish about decimal places to make a poor point. You were not being constructive.
1
@richard-gn3es "why quote your own statement?" Get a grip.
1
@richard-gn3es "yes the first thing you quoted was yourself it seemed odd." Maybe that's because you're not clever enough to write in sentences so actually following meaning is not something you are good at. "I think i must have gotten confused along the way?" The answer to that question is "no". You are wrong. Again. Gotten?
1
@richard-gn3es Gotten?
1
@richard-gn3es It might be where you are!
1
@richard-gn3es "it is indeed common to hear it here in England." No. It's relatively rare. "if you are thinking "gotten" is an American word you are sadly mistaken" That's an "if".
1
@richard-gn3es "it is indeed common to hear it here in England." No. It's relatively rare. That's verifiable. No shortage of rubbish to post, eh?
1
@championn3c574 No shortage of rubbish to post, eh?
1
Deliberately misconstrued. Obvious sphincter stuff.
1
@theslimeylimey The narrative there is misconstrued. Obvious stuff. Do you actually fool yourself with that?
1
@theslimeylimey I didn't say that. That's an attempt to strawman me. Clever, you? I don't think so.
1
@theslimeylimey In said that the narrative there is misconstrued. You bored yet?
1
@theslimeylimey You will be.
1