Youtube comments of (@tinkeringtim7999).

  1. 345
  2. 172
  3. 133
  4. 92
  5. 70
  6. 64
  7. 52
  8. 45
  9. 44
  10. 41
  11. 33
  12. 31
  13. 31
  14. 31
  15. 28
  16. 28
  17. @angelynakukwe9069 To get into a STEM subject at university without being good at maths you bash your head against it, cramming a bunch of formulas in your head, figure out which ones they want you to bust out for the exams, scoop up a high grade. You can get an A* without having any real idea of what mathematics is, what ot does, how it works, how to use it, what the statements really mean, and how to work with them beyond what has already been worked out. I know this to be true because I did exactly that, ditto for A levels. All that good stuff, you need to very rapidly learn at university, usually by completely destroying and re-making mathematics from the ground up - almost nothing taught in schools is adequate or reliable enough for subjects that make genuine use of mathematics. That was a common experience among my peers when I studied Theoretical Physics. It's not just the curriculum, but also the way the education system is calibrated and controlled, which mashes mathematics into a bewildering bunch of mantras which mostly teaches kids to hear and obey or else be generally regarded as stupid. As someone who has spent his life thinking mathematically, studied Theoretical Physics, and have a personal library of hundreds of original maths books covering how teaching maths has changed over the last 200 years; I can confidently state that the way maths is structured and taught today is the worst that has ever been recorded in history, by such a long shot its in a whole different ballpark. In that, I include records of ways of teaching maths as far back as ancient times. I'm sure we could do worse, but it would be difficult to see how to do that. Even chopping out a random part of the curriculum would be an improvement at this point. I really don't know how they've managed to make sure all decisions are made within a bubble of people a fraction of whom have a genuine appreciation of mathematics and how it interacts with people's minds.
    25
  18. 20
  19. 18
  20. 16
  21. 16
  22. 15
  23. 15
  24. 14
  25. 14
  26. 13
  27. 13
  28. 13
  29. 13
  30. 12
  31. 12
  32. 12
  33. 11
  34. 11
  35. 11
  36. 10
  37. 10
  38. 10
  39. 10
  40. 9
  41. 9
  42. 9
  43. 9
  44. 9
  45. 9
  46. 8
  47. 8
  48. 8
  49. 8
  50. 8
  51. 8
  52. 8
  53. 8
  54. 8
  55. 7
  56. 7
  57. 7
  58. 7
  59. 7
  60. 6
  61. 6
  62. 6
  63. 6
  64. 6
  65. 6
  66. 6
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 5
  70. 5
  71. 5
  72. 5
  73. 5
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. 5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 4
  90. 4
  91. 4
  92. 4
  93. 4
  94. 4
  95. 4
  96. 4
  97. 4
  98. 4
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. Hi, I think you misunderstood the intended audience and the argument. If he claims "modern science didn't know" and you refute it by hieroglyphs, you have some explaining to do. It was also simplified, and was not put forward in the form of an argument amenable to strict logical analysis - its content to invite people to think about these things and ask questions from people who know. Islam does not do dawah the same way westerners proselytise materialism. Its akin to someone approaching you with cookies and you somehow being triggered and punching them out because you thought they came at you with a swing. If it were laid out and pitched at the philosopher level, it would likely have much more detail on the intent as to why it would be seen as a miracle. The fact still remains those things were not collected in any single work. Also, the quran is a guide, its test is to remain not misguiding to all mankind and all times since Muhammed. So, you have refuted someone offering you cookies by punching them in the face, but not refuted whatbthe quran claims of itself or Islam claims of the quran's miracles. I'm an ex atheist with a degree in theoretical physics. Please email physics.dawah at proton dot me, if you'd like to discuss privately and gain a better understanding of why the quran is so very very different from any other book made before it or thatvever could be made after it, even in principle. You can push me to arbitrary technical levels, we can even conduct arguments in symbolic logic and equations if you wish. Peace be with you.
    3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. This video is a huge projection. Platonic materialism does this to people's minds. I have a degree in theoretical physics, but people like you turn your nose up at me because youre "more professional". If you're a working physicists you know less about the real history of phsyics and how it came together than others outside. Physicists are generally utterly immune to criticism of the fundamentals, as they put everything that is not in their institutions in the crackpot bucket. This is the exact same process from voiceless to priest to the veil that Platonism used - just on a grander scale than he envisioned. Solvay conference turned physics into engineering. I don't know what youre working on, but its almost certainly actually engineering. Tell me, how did Gibbs & Heaviside perform the miracle of "simplifying" 7 (or 20) quaternion field equations to 4 linear ones?! How did mickey mouse and Morley differentiate Maxwell's LORENTIAN aether from their "4th direction is time, as prophecied" hysteria of the 1900 to 1920s using their perpendicular detectors?! If logical consistency is so important, why did the physics community flock to the path integral even though they knew it was mathematically inconsistent and therefore logically BS? How did shoddy approximations using the Gibbs/Heaviside formalism become unshakeable founding experiments like the double slit to which everything else was re-adjusted?! When Boltzmann was hell bent in finding atoms somehow in the continuity equation, he used generalised functions to put them in by hand - painting over all the topological holes he lost the information for with "all microstates are equally likely" bayesian paint?! Topologically what he did would leave around a bunch of discs and punctured spheres. What do we find when we apply it?! Fermions and bosons! Its a miracle! No, its all self-fulfilling platonic philosophy which is utterly unable to see its own contradictions. Look at Hilbert space, banach spaces with some specific structure to mimic perturbation theory using fourier expansions. Hailed as a hero, yet the finite basis theorem it relies on is how logically sound? Lets see now, oh yeah it is the law that of Hilbert makes up a dichotomy it must be real. Gödel proved he can't assume its either true or false because he's dealing with an infinite logic - that proof came after solvay where Bohr slaughtered physics on the altar if pragmatism and made everyone engineers who believe the platonic myth that can onlybsurvive of one puts blind faith in Hilbert. Funny, Hilbert's finite basis theorem was correctly identified as theology so he got his buddy Klein to get his daddy to get it published and later push him out of the journal for it. Turned out after Hilber's death the 23rd problem in his desk that he didn't publish shows he knew all along his philosophy lacked a logical foundation. Gödel proved it false using Hilbert's own game and Hilbert accepted the result but did not admit he was utterly wrong in the claims he made about logic and geometry - all he did was re-write what was already known in formalism that he controlled the narrative fir using the Götingen gang (Sommerfeld, Born, Klein, et. al.) Manipulative gaslighting ideological fanatic platonist made himself a hero by infecting mathematical proof with populism. I have 700 books spanning 1800 to 1970 and the more evidence I have, the more I must be a crack-pot. Doesn't matter that I can do the maths, have the original evidences of the misunderstandings, and of the political and other forces acting on the development of physics which are totally ignored in all syllabuses. But, I'm not a dedicant of Platonism, therefore I must be a crackpot and everything I know must be a stupid misunderstanding.
    2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. @20-sideddice13  That's an article of faith, and proves the entire debate has gone over your head. Recap, the debate is constructionist vs formalist. Formalists won control of institutions for a number of reasons, none of them logical. Now generations only know the formalise view point. Manufactured "consensus" by hiding the debate for generations. All you're proving is a PhD might be well educated to be a cog in that machine, but is utterly ill-equipped to tackle questions about truth and the fundamentals of mathematics. It's seems clear that your PhD has in fact been a handicap for this kind of question. The who bunch of garbage about the 5th postulate as if nobody thought of curved surfaces for a thousand years is just historically illiterate garbage which is pumped out as truth today, largely because it made Hilberts career with T axioms. Tell me, is the Banach-Tarsky "Paradox" a "Paradox" or a proof by contradiction? When a formalist declares "I am unable to conjure a false dichotomy, if I propose a dichotomy, it's as valid as any other" - anyone else saying that would be obviously insane. But put fancy symbols round it and use political power to crush opponents careers, and Hilbert easily changed "Theology" to "The future of mathematics". Every win was by dirty politics using extraordinary clout and his cabal at Göttingen. Literally nothing was won by strength of logic. The opposite in fact. His whole program was so defeated he had to leech off physics to try to get some credibility. Yet another confidence trick worked. Of course, the Victors wrote the history. I could go on, quaternions are another tragic example. You have a lot to learn, having a PhD puts you on the first rung. Good luck.
    2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. Generating money which is then spent on charity and courses to help people understand Islam is not a problem. I don't see them saying "whatever", I believe they are sincere about what they're saying. They know they will be judged. 49:12 ... I might be mistaken, but it seems to me you are making negative assumptions about what they are doing and their intentions. If they're spending it on fancy cars, that's quite different ... but I don't see that. I see them using monetised platforms to be able to dedicate themselves full-time to improving their ability to counter anti-muslim narratives in the population. I don't think its fair to say they're a bad example and nobody should follow their example. Its not fair to categorically call it begging - its called EARNING. They are very clear sadaqa goes to sadaqa and getting money so they can go full time and give better dawah is different and a good thing for the Ummah. Certainly the enemy has people making propaganda full time, why can't we have some full time dawah people? How on earth does it make sense to think that a highly qualified scholar is the person who should be focussing on dawah or you shouldn't focus on daway if you're not a highly qualified scholar? I'm sorry I respect so much of your content but this particular video just looks like shaytaan making you see something beautiful and halal as ugly and disgusting. I accept it looks like rational deduction to you, but I absolutely can refute that what you said in that video is rational deduction. And I don't mean loose logic, we could even do it in propositional logic if you wish. That was not rational deduction alone, of that I have no doubt. At least, entertain that possibility.
    2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. The Quran says: "Say, ˹O Prophet,˺ “Come! Let me recite to you what your Lord has forbidden to you: do not associate others with Him ˹in worship˺. ˹Do not fail to˺ honour your parents. Do not kill your children for fear of poverty. We provide for you and for them. Do not come near indecencies, openly or secretly. Do not take a ˹human˺ life—made sacred by Allah—except with ˹legal˺ right. This is what He has commanded you, so perhaps you will understand." 6:151 Without nationalism, there would be no way to associate those particular individuals he shot with guilt for swedens' role in fighting against Islam and muslims. Nationalism was born in France, it is alien to Islam. "Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him) reported: I heard the Messenger of Allah (may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon him) say: "The first to be judged on the Day of Judgment is a man who was martyred. He will be brought and Allah will remind him of His favor [upon him], which he will recognize. Allah will say: 'What did you do as a token of gratitude for that favor?' He will say: 'I fought for Your sake until I was martyred.' Allah will say: 'You have lied. You fought so it would be said that you were brave, and it was said.' It will be commanded that he be dragged on his face until he is thrown in the Fire." However, no muslim is able to judge that man; he could have been mentally ill or controlled/possessed for all we know. Certainly he was deceived by nationalism, but little else other than the deaths is clear. Allah knows best.
    1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. @MarvinT  that's what people said about hypersonic missiles, then when they show them it's too late. Compare that with the US F-35 "yeah, it'll totally work really well, we're really just about to make and ship loads of them ... uh ... The US government has spent an entire generation gaslighting US people about what Russia is like and how it works. Gaslighting includes projecting your own failure on the other as you try to flip the script and twist things around so you're the hero and they're the villain. The rest of the world sees the US being a dangerous infantile merciless brainless selfish violent beast, and this is a very well deserved assessment. Do you think that's just everyone being jealous of how great you are? America has been the best place to live because it used the petrodollar and its military to bully literally the whole world into submission. Not because of any kind of special skill, certainly not for the vapid fake morality the brainwashed think US has, but because the population was easily bought. As the hegemony wanes, and Americans have to suddenly join a more level playing field, we'll see how well they survive. Given the number of debt dollars bearing "In God We Trust", and yet the US has never trusted God, only ever used him for political gains ... the debt based inflation bomb the US made for itself is not just the largest in history, it has been accompanied by an extraordinary loss of morality and abuse of religion as a tool. It will be sad watching the US rip itself apart, but better than watching what we've seen ever since 2001.
    1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. @Opponent May Cry  You really have drunk the kool-aid. You are historically illiterate. Russia defeated the Nazis, the US then knew when to swoop in fresh and take credit for and take over everything. 1938 Hitler was Time magazine's man of the year. The US DID ITS BEST TO STOKE WW2 IN THE FIRST PLACE, IT PLAYED BOTH SIDES UNTIL PERL HARBOUR. You are utterly historically illiterate. The US has only been a self-aggrandising manipulative monster on the international stage. We would all have been better off if you learned to live with the natives instead of iradicating them and then playing the French off the British to weaken both. America is defined by war and oppression. Its known nothing but duplicitous bullying since it got its first sniff of power. Americans are just utterly brainwashed by ridiculous reductive history and flag-waving. Nobody wants you to be the world police, everyone wanted you to leave us in peace. You turned Russia into a hole ON PURPOSE as geopolitical strategy. You blocked Russia from normalising with Europe as Germany did because of your selfish arrogance and aspirations of total dominance. You only had supremacy because of your duplicitous petrodollar deal which forces the whole world to eat your inflation for you. The US literally requires s**ting on the rest of the world to survive economically. Being an American who is proud of your country and your military simply proves you're a good little servant of evil and you've not found need to use your brain. US hegemony has collapsed. Good riddance. The rest of the world can't wait to be out from under your control freak world bully empire. Thank God Americans got too excited and spaffed the whole advantage up the wall in a record short 75 years of empire. Thank God the peace preventing scourge of humanity has finally gone limp. May you never find viagra again. Maybe now you'll start establishing consensual relationships with other countries. Imagine that?!
    1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1