Comments by "CatsRule" (@1133saginaw) on "Trump calls for Biden, Obama to be indicted in 'greatest political crime in history'" video.

  1. Trump will be held accountable, come January 20. Now they are wondering what happened to the missing 170 million dollars in Trump campaign money.
    28
  2. The FBI was investigating the hundreds of links between the Trump campaign and Russian spies. They aren't going to indict anyone for investigating that. How would they ever get a conviction if they tried? No jury is going to side with Trump over national security.
    9
  3.  ben libbe  He will have no power after Jan. 20. Let him stay. He can clean up in the kitchen to make himself useful.
    9
  4. Read Barr's background. He's as swampy as they come.
    7
  5.  D.R. Kolarski  Whales aren't fish.
    4
  6. President's don't have the power to indict, Bozo.
    4
  7.  Zeek Banistor  Trump's buddy is controlling the campaign funds. He's being investigated because he now is driving around in a Ferrari. They think he took as much as 40 million. What happened to the rest?
    4
  8.  Zeek Banistor  "The Campaign Legal Center said in the 81-page filing that the president’s reelection campaign and campaign committee hid $170 million in spending to major vendors as well as family members and associates by diverting the money through firms headed by Brad Parscale, who was replaced as campaign manager earlier this month, as well as other senior campaign officials. The nonprofit alleged that the campaign effectively laundered money in order to hide payments to contractors and advisors, including the maker of a campaign app, as well as Lara Trump, the president’s daughter-in-law, and Kimberly Guilfoyle, a former Fox News host who is dating the president’s son Donald Trump Jr." Drain the swamp.
    4
  9.  Trixie Pooh  Trump is the swamp.
    3
  10. First, there has to be a crime. There won't be indictments because there has to be some evidence to present to a Grand Jury. If there was evidence, indictments would have been brought many months ago.
    3
  11. Roger Stone did illegal activities. Obama didn't.
    2
  12.  @Depression2010  No one is going to indict someone for no reason. It doesn't look good, it is expensive and it is illegal..
    2
  13.  Duke Of Prunes  They were investigating the flood of contacts between the Trump campaign and the Russians. What would you do if you discovered the campaign manager of a political party was communicating with known Russian spies, look the other way? From the Senate Intelligence Committee report (written by Republicans): The Committee found that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian effort to hack computer networks and accounts affiliated with the Democratic Party and leak information damaging to Hillary Clinton and her campaign for president. Moscow's intent was to harm the Clinton Campaign, tarnish an expected Clinton presidential administration, help the Trump Campaign after Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee, and undermine the U.S. democratic process.
    2
  14.  @Jlind9335  How about the Senate Intelligence Committee report? It was written by Republicans. Fox News didn't report this so you are as ignorant as a new born babe. Here is a sample: The Committee found that Manafort's presence on the Campaign at;td proximity to Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign. Taken as a whole, Manafort's highlevel access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik and associates of Oleg Deripaska, represented a grave counterintelligence threat. or (U) Trump and senior Campaign offici.als sought to obtain advance information about WikiLeaks's planned releases through Roger Stone.
    2
  15.  Daniel Johnston  Barr isn't going to indict Hillary or Obama. He said so himself months ago. So why are you here?
    2
  16. King Trump, the contaminated. He's getting pretty desperate. Another "exclusive" interview on Fox? What is it now, number 120?
    2
  17.  @georgeramirezjr1111  He definitely stayed out of his pandemic response too long. He couldn't even keep the virus out of the White House. How inept is that?
    2
  18. LOL What an idiot.
    2
  19.  @hxhdfjifzirstc894  Now they are saying your precious Durham report won't be finished before the election. So why continue? The whole thing is a scam anyway.
    2
  20. Trump is going down. It makes no difference what Barr does.
    2
  21.  CottageGarden SMITH  They all know Trump is going down.
    2
  22.  @johnstorton  Trump's job description requires him to pay for the wall by going through congress, not diverting funds from military base school construction projects. He failed at that like he failed to protect us from Covid19.
    2
  23.  Biden4 Littlegirls  Trump might have been a part of the missing 177 million Republican campaign donations. Can't be bought my a**. He owes everyone money. He desperate.
    1
  24. His businesses have gone bankrupt He got his backbone from not paying his bills.
    1
  25.  John Durham  They had reason to investigate Trump. 100 + contacts with Russia and they lied about the contacts? . A little suspicious, don't you think?
    1
  26. The Bible doesn't say abortion is a sin. The seven deadly sins are pride, envy, wrath, sloth, greed, gluttony, and lust.
    1
  27. Conspiracy theories don't count as evidence.
    1
  28. What indictments? Don't hold your breath.
    1
  29. They aren't going to indict anyone. Trump is just totally desperate to win this lost cause of his. Winning for him is a ticket to stay out of prison. You clowns are fools.
    1
  30.  D.R. Kolarski  It's illegal to have poll watchers. They will be kicked out.
    1
  31.  @ampatriot6242  That's nuts. The military stays out of it.
    1
  32.    I learned Presidents don't have the power to indict in High School. Or sending people to military tribunals . Or sending people to Guantanimo (which the US holds illegally).
    1
  33.  JIM S  what I said the president does not have the power to indict by himself. The Justice Department has that power.
    1
  34. @Wally Kazam How are they going to corrupt the system while out of power? They need to be held accountable for what? You have been paying too much attention to Fox News conspiracy theories. Biden is a traitor for doing what? Running for president? You are clearly confused.
    1
  35.  @gunner1387  Why would I wear a mask while I type?
    1
  36.  Gloria Sheppard  I prefer to research. You can have your Lou Dobbs , Buggs Bunny and Sean Hannity.
    1
  37. Barr said he wasn't going to indict Clinton or Obama, so why do you waste your time? If he does indict someone RIGHT BEFORE THE ELECTION, who will believe it? It will never make it to court, because, as I mentioned before , no jury would be likely to convict.
    1
  38.  Gloria Sheppard  Did you read any of this? This was written by Senate Republicans. : The Committee found that Manafort's presence on the Campaign at;td proximity to Trump created opportunities for Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign. Taken as a whole, Manafort's highlevel access and willingness to share information with individuals closely affiliated with the Russian intelligence services, particularly Kilimnik and associates of Oleg Deripaska, represented a grave counterintelligence threat. Of course they were going to investigate. Who fool, besides you, wouldn't?
    1
  39.  @socalgalronee9471  Trump's not going to be reelected. Get used to the idea.
    1
  40.  @socalgalronee9471  Why doesn't Trump have a comment regarding the Michigan governor kidnap scheme of his supporters? He's never going to win with that attitude. Law and Order.
    1
  41. Genius Trump spend most of his day Tweeting.
    1
  42. That "cocktail" he took is only available for rich people. He stuck his head in a pot of virus because he is an idiot.
    1
  43.  @ladytrucker5116  Right wing terrorists were just arrested for attempting to kidnap Michigan's governor. Noam Chomsky said "The Republican Party is the most dangerous organization in human history".
    1
  44.  @123tominator007  Military tribunals? Just how stupid are you? The military has nothing to do with anything. There are no indictments either..
    1
  45.  @123tominator007  Military tribunals for anything civilian is against the law.
    1
  46.  @123tominator007  Speaking of against the law, when are we going to give Cuba back her Guantanamo base which we keep illegally?
    1
  47. Definition: " A military tribunal is an inquisitorial system based on charges brought by military authorities, prosecuted by a military authority, judged by military officers, and sentenced by military officers against a member of an enemy army."
    1
  48.  Josh Boalton  You'll be waiting a long time.
    1
  49.  Zeek Banistor  "The Campaign Legal Center said in the 81-page filing that the president’s reelection campaign and campaign committee hid $170 million in spending to major vendors as well as family members and associates by diverting the money through firms headed by Brad Parscale, who was replaced as campaign manager earlier this month, as well as other senior campaign officials. The nonprofit alleged that the campaign effectively laundered money in order to hide payments to contractors and advisors, including the maker of a campaign app, as well as Lara Trump, the president’s daughter-in-law, and Kimberly Guilfoyle, a former Fox News host who is dating the president’s son Donald Trump Jr."
    1
  50. You don't indict if you can't convict. This "spy gate" is just a diversion from Trump's horrible handling of the pandemic. No one, but you Bozos takes it seriously.
    1
  51.  @bobmildrum5825  I was hoping you would make a fool of yourself by attempting to debunk the Senate Intelligence Committee report. I guess name calling is the next best thing - for children.
    1
  52.  @richardgene4231  They haven't had a trial yet.
    1