Comments by "CatsRule" (@1133saginaw) on "5 famous moon landing conspiracy theories debunked" video.

@jellyfishsquawk Stars are not there because it is too bright on the moon to see stars. It's an eye thing. Go under a bright street light as see how many stars you see in the sky.
128
@brianmartin8479 There is a lot more evidence of the moon landings than stupid hoaxers cover in their videos. Just the existence of 840 lbs of moon rocks is really everything one would need. They have been studied by thousands of scientists from all over the world for nearly 50 years. Not one scientist has ever suggested they were fake, or came from Antarctica, etc. To disprove the landings , forget about the videos, you must disprove the moon rocks. Good luck with that.
10
@declanh2314 They didn't have the technology to fake a moon landing in the 60's. They did have the technology to go, however. So they went.
7
Cameras in the bright sun are set for daytime photography with very fast shutter speeds. To photograph stars you need very slow shutter speeds, so slow that you often need to place the camera on a tripod. So the astronauts had the choice of very overexposed moon pictures with nice stars or nice lunar pictures with no stars.
5
They can go into higher orbits any time. Just going into orbit costs millions. To go into orbit for no reason would require some explanation, especially if they are using tax payer money.
4
@lorenzopedrotti6290 "some kind of noise must be heard during communication" Apollo 15: they said the engine sounded like the wind. When you think about it, sitting in your car - the engine is four feet from you. Car engines (without a muffler) are loud as hell, yet you hardly hear a thing.
4
@suekennedy8917 Stupid comment on your part. How many videos do you have of you entering your car? Does this prove you don't drive No? Like I said very stupid comment. In the LEM during ascent, they had the camera pointing out the window. Did you think they had room for a film crew?
3
"You have to be willing to look at the science. We have never been to the moon. " You obviously don't look at science. You watch conspiracy videos. You base your opinions from garbage.
2
@runerune-_-9727 I studied those photos for weeks. The movies they took riding in the rover obviously weren't taken in a studio. How do you explain them?
1
@KyleEATERbaaanGMD The cameras were the best cameras ever made. You just can't take pictures of stars in bright light. You can't do it here on the earth ; you can't do it on the moon.
1
@carloslebaron Cameras typically will capture what the human eye sees at 50mm, a focal length never used because it is so limiting. Most photography is done at shorter focal lengths because you can "get more in" the picture. But shorter focal lengths will make things look smaller .
1