Comments by "CatsRule" (@1133saginaw) on "This was a MAJOR FRAUD | Rudy Giuliani" video.

  1. “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    6
  2.  @finalcritic6091  Believe the judge: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    5
  3. He can be your president in exile, because he's leaving office.
    5
  4. He's given up with the virus. He even quit attending meetings. Last Saturday he skipped one to go golfing. Yes, he's really fighting for our lives. Biden has done more in the past two weeks than Trump has done in the past five months.
    5
  5. Right. it should be obvious.. It isn't. There is no fraud. Giuliani said so , under oath, in court. Amazing how his story changes when he is not under oath.
    3
  6. “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    3
  7. Why did Giuliani plead to the court no fraud occurred? Under oath, he is a different man. Only gullible Republicans are fooled.
    2
  8. “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    2
  9. Because no one has time to read 80 million affidavits.
    2
  10.  @catherinegrace6406  And the Trump appointed judge threw the case out today.
    2
  11. “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents. So do you understand what "We have neither here" means?
    2
  12. Giuliani plead no fraud occurred to the judge.
    2
  13. Can you think of a better word for overturning an election? it's a coup by definition.
    2
  14.  @Luka23567  But there is no evidence it was conducted like a freak show.
    2
  15.  @stevefischer9336  State issues don't get appealed to the Supreme Court anyway.
    2
  16.  Kenna  And yet Giuliani plead in court, under oath, that no fraud occurred. For something so "blatant", why no evidence? The Trump appointed judge in Pennsylvania threw out Trump's case today due to lack of evidence.
    2
  17. The technical term for overturning elections is "coup d'etat".
    2
  18. “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    2
  19. Biden won by 6 million. Deal with it.
    2
  20. So why did Giuliani plead in court there was no fraud?
    2
  21. “ 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    1
  22. The Marxist judge today was Trump appointed. “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    1
  23. Elections don't go to the Supreme Court.
    1
  24. “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    1
  25. They didn't say that today: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    1
  26. Yes, the present course is Biden being sworn in on 1/20/21
    1
  27. So why do you want the courts to decide the election?
    1
  28. Epstein paled around with Trump for 15 years. He voted for Trump.
    1
  29.  @jcrider392  Giuliani hasn't had much luck exposing the frauds, in fact , over and over again he has plead no fraud in the courts. Hard to win a fraud case when you plead fraud did not exist? What a difference it makes when you are under oath.
    1
  30.  @jcrider392  Who cares?
    1
  31. Here's what is going on: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents. :
    1
  32. Trump still has his gold toilet at Mar-a-Lago. Did he give it up?
    1
  33. Making fools of themselves is part of a plan.
    1
  34.  @jefferydixson8952  The "real team of lawyers" would lose their licenses over this crap. Trump's efforts to overturn an election (a coup) has to fail. A good thing.
    1
  35. "Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    1
  36.  @sr5723  But Giuliani, in court, under oath, plead fraud did not exist.
    1
  37. You mean the brave American who dodged the draft? President "bone-spurs"?
    1
  38. For attempting a coup in favor of Trump? I agree.
    1
  39.  thetalentedmrman  There is no evidence: Judge, today in court: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” 3rd Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote for the three-judge panel, all appointed by Republican presidents.
    1
  40. Giuliani didn't say "fraud" in court. "No your honor, we do not plead fraud". Funny how being under oath brings out the best in us.
    1
  41. He'll be gone in two months.
    1
  42. Giuliani told the judge (under oath) fraud did not occur.
    1
  43.  @lillianparks3562  “So does the amended complaint plead fraud in the particularity?” the judge asked. “No, Your Honor, it doesn’t plead fraud,” Giuliani finally acknowledged.
    1
  44.  @lillianparks3562  It's a quote by the judge. Giuliani did not claim fraud. The whole thing is a scam.
    1
  45.  @lillianparks3562  Trump supporters are sending in money for these phony lawsuits. His attorneys are going to milk this for all it's worth. Giuliani said he was getting $20,000 a day. They will stretch this all the way to Biden's inauguration and go to the bank.
    1
  46.  @lillianparks3562  Except they got caught winning an election, nothing else. If Giuliani had evidence of fraud , he would have presented it in court. Instead , he said: "No your honor, and we don't plead fraud". (an odd way to win a fraud case). This is an attempted coup d'état, nothing else.
    1
  47.  @lillianparks3562  No, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said no evidence of fraud was found.
    1
  48. Giuliani plead in court no fraud occurred. ???
    1