Comments by "Ida Larsen" (@idalarsen2540) on "Former Republican Senator humiliated on air by Fox News host" video.

  1. It's about time Stacey Abrahms just gets appointed Queen of Georgia or whatever (I know that's not very democratic, buuuuut..), at least for a while, just so that she can make sure that these bad faith repukeliKKKans can't rig the election and suppress democratic voters. NB!!: I'm not American so don't come after me if I'm mistaken about anything I'm about to say. Isn't most residents of Georgia black people and/or people of color (I'm not too fond of that term as it divides literally one group of people (white ppl) from everybody else with more (or a lot more) melanin in their skin. That just feels.. segregating. I just don't know of any better way to put it:/ I know POC is a widely used term and I hope it's not offensive, despite it actually being (at least a bit..) offensive. Or am I just being too PC and overreacting? 🤔 Irdk. Just food for thought. I'm white myself (as you can clearly see in my pic where I'm ghostly white lol, can't help it 😅😅), so I'm not one to determine what's offensive or not. BUT ANYWAY, rambling over. Isn't the vast majority of Georgia's population POC, yet most political representatives white? Also, isn't the vast majority of Gerogia's population democrats/liberals/progressives/all in all left-leaning, yet again, their political representatives repukeliKKKans/conservatives/all in all right-leaning? Just asking. That's the impression that I've somehow gotten, and I don't know if it's right or wrong, or to what degree it's right or wrong. I literally just want to learn here, so there's no need to come at me. If ANYTHING that I said is offensive to someone, please tell me. I can't see how a single word, sentence or parapragh would be offensive as this is all rethorical, questions and objective. Still, please tell me if anything, literally anything made your nose wrinkle, and why. I'm curious and want to know. My thing is, if my first analysis is right, that seems to me to be a definite clear indicator on how undemocratic it is, and have been for far too long. I understand that there's nuances ti everything, and that just because you're black, doesn't mean that you vote democrat etc. I get that. I'm just speaking in more general terms. If my analysis or whatever is right, that'd mean there's an even bigger reason to label repukeliKKKans corrupt (I know most of them are, and I know many democrats are as well - most democrats just don't seem AS corrupt), and an even bigger reason to fight hard against these repukeliKKKans bad faith rethoric and clear voter suppression. I don't even understand how that's legal. In my country (Norway), if anything even remotely similar happened, there'd be a massive uproar. Not that anything like this would happen, because our elected officials literally can't try to rig elections. You get the most votes? You win. Our parliament is shared by MANY parties, not just two. We the people can vote for ANY existing party, and they get seats depending on the percentage of the votes. Unless you're on of the absolute biggest, most popular party, there's not even a guarantee you'll get a seat. We neither have presidents, we're more similar to the UK. We have a royal family, but they're fairly insignificant, unlike in the UK. For the most part, our royal family just represents our history, and represent us to the world. They really don't have any political influence at all. People barely pay any attention to them, lol. They're kinda just there. Our actual leader is a prime minister (who is a woman! I don't like her all too much because she's part of one of the most conservative parties we have. She's/her party is not too bad tho, they're not the absolute most conservative. Also, even our most conservative politicians/parties believe in free healthcare, abortion rights, social wellfare programs etc. All of that is standard here, not to be messed with). One party "rules all", or I guess it's more fitting to say they have the final say in all matters, but they HAVE TO work with two other parties as a joint leadership. The rest of the parties/politicians that gets certain amounts of seats leads as well, but they're mostly there to vote for those they represent, which they actually do. They all know they have to do what they promise before elections, because there's no way they can rig their way into parliament. It's not a perfect system, no system is. It's still WAAAAAAAY MORE democratic than America, and we're way more free. I don't understand how you feel you in America even come close to a democracy. America seems to hide beneath a democratic fasade, but that's it. The rest is corrupt. I'm privileged to not be an American, I must say...
    4