Comments by "Ida Larsen" (@idalarsen2540) on "Dr. Phil" channel.

  1. 511
  2. 450
  3. 228
  4. 166
  5. 164
  6. 156
  7. 133
  8. 108
  9. 79
  10. 78
  11. 76
  12. 72
  13. 67
  14. 62
  15. 61
  16. 55
  17. 51
  18. 47
  19. 40
  20. 40
  21. 39
  22. It's weird just how much I can relate to EVERYTHING she said (except being famous ofc). I know very well I had a bad and frightening childhood, but whenever people (including CPS, the police and such during my teen years) asked me what was so wrong, what had happened, why I was so scared and such, I had no coherent answer. I just put up a brick wall, or started crying and sobbing hysterically, almost as if I went back to a very vulnerable child like-state, just like how I was as a (very) young child. I knew deep within that something was wrong, that something had happened. I just couldn't figure out what it was. So, people thought I was just another run away-teen, doing rebellious "teen-stuff". That hurt me so bad and made me doubt myself and my entire existence, only making everything worse. I ended up homeless, severly addicted to drugs including injecting heroin. I OD'd several times, one time I barely made it. Someone found me, cracked all my ribs doing CPR (which is really good - it means they really did it right. I was dead anyway, so I was blessed af being able to wake up at all, despite being on life support for a few days). I am forever grateful to the people that saved my life. I even jokingly thanked them for breaking all my ribs. I was fortunate enough to meet them, and they were fortunate enough to meet me again - not because I'm special or whatever, but so that they could see living proof of their hard work and heroism considering that I'd be dead if it wasn't for them acting fast and logically. Trust me when I say that group hug we had lasted for a loooooooong time with loads of tears and sobbing from all of us. Anyway. I'm not diagnosed with DID, but it's reckognized medically that I do suffer from childhood trauma as well as severe adult trauma. PTSD, anxiety, depression and drug addiction. Possibly more, I'm working with a pshychiatrist on possible diagnoses. Not just to put yet another label on me, but so that I can get the help I need. DID is in fact a possibility. We don't know for sure yet. Due to my long term, hardcore drug usage, it's a lot harder to separate one experience and/or symptom from the other. It's a work in progress. I hope I don't have any more psychological issues than I already have, but if I do, I absolutely want to know so that I can understand myself better, and make life better in the long run. It just baffled me how relatable her story is to mine, despite our differences. If anyone bothered reading this, thank you so much. If anyone reading this are struggling with whatever it may be, I hope that you get help. I hope you have, or get support. I wish you well, and a good life. I wish you'll be able to feel like you're thriving, not just surviving. You deserve it. You really do. Best wishes from me 💚💚💚👊
    39
  23. 35
  24. 35
  25. 34
  26. 33
  27. 31
  28. 30
  29. 28
  30. 28
  31. 28
  32. 28
  33. 25
  34. 25
  35. 24
  36. 23
  37. 23
  38. 23
  39. 22
  40. 21
  41. 20
  42. 19
  43. 19
  44. 18
  45. 18
  46. 18
  47. 18
  48. 18
  49. 18
  50. 17
  51. 17
  52. 17
  53. 16
  54. 15
  55. 15
  56. 15
  57. 14
  58. 14
  59. 13
  60. 13
  61. 12
  62. 12
  63. 12
  64. 12
  65. 12
  66. 11
  67. 11
  68. 11
  69. 11
  70. 11
  71. 11
  72. 11
  73. 10
  74. 10
  75. 10
  76. 10
  77. 10
  78. 10
  79. 10
  80. 10
  81. 10
  82. 10
  83. 9
  84. 9
  85. I know right, wtf? SO many people here are blaming her and are just being plain CRUEL. None of those people see the ACTUAL problem here. This is NOTHING but exploitation and sensationalism for views, his own gain. He talks down to her so much, breaking her down even more.. while she's obiviously laying down on the floor in pain. He's kicking her while she's down, it's just cruel. I've been an addict myself and have gotten those kinds of treatment (take the TV part out of it), and all it did was make me do even more drugs. Smh. It wasn't until someone actually started treating me better and considered the effect their words had on me, after I got so mad about it all that I had to just scream in his face how terrible he made me feel, that all it did was made me feel worse and fall even deeper into my addictions that I started to even just CONSIDER that what I was doing were more harmful than I wanted to think. Knowing that you're not judged for falling was such a big comfort to me. It made me actually want to do SOMETHING about it. It took me an extremely long time and many, many tries over several years for me to actually sober up - and stay sober. I still enjoy some drugs from time to time (smoke weed daily, most at night time due to ptsd related nightmares and insomnia, a very rare couple of drinks or a couple beers and sometimes I take amphetamine/speed, although that's rare), but it's all under control. I work, pay my rent and bills and take properly care of my self, my dog and my cat. So finally, I'm doing good. If people treated me like Phil treats this lady, I'd literally be dead. I would have no incentive to try to help myself. I'd feel to shameful and worthless. Shame on you, "Dr." Phil.. shame.
    9
  86. 9
  87. 9
  88. 9
  89. For real. I became homeless for about three years, and I had both a dog and a cat before that happened (honestly not my fault, seriously. Long story). Luckily I knew that my dog could stay with my father safely, so she wasn't really a worry for me. My cat on the other hand was. I knew of no one that would agree to take care of my cat for me while I tried finding a new place, so I was extremely worried. I asked EVERYONE I knew, posted about it daily on facebook and everywhere. I knew I could give him away, but I simply refused having to give him up to strangers. That was so horrible, the entire thing. I wanted my sweet cat back, we loved each other so much and I knew I could provide a great home for him as soon as I found somewhere new to live. It took me quite some time, three years like I said - but I did it. I eventually did recieve an offer from a friend who were willing to take him in, but after a while she found him to be "too much" for her (she fell way too deep in her drug abuse smh, my cat wasn't at fault in any way. He's a sweetie. I panicked as I had to look for someone else. Eventually someone else I knew took him in, but after a while they broke up and we're moving away from each other, and none of them were willing to take him with them. Same route once again. These two people were my last hope (I thought), so it absolutely broke my heart. I still refused to give him up. Then, like a miracle, some friends of some of my other friends had heard about our story and wanted to help - for free, even. They took him in and cared so much for him. They cared so much in fact that they wanted to TAKE HIM, despite promising me that I'd get him back when the time was ready. I was livid, completely FURIOUS. I couldn't do anything but cry myself to sleep every night, and just the thought of him brought me to tears. I had already fought so much for him, my energy was drained. Still, the thought of losing him for good was too much for me. I just couldn't take it. I did everything and more to convince them to give him back to me. After months of living in my new apartment, I still hadn't gotten him back, but I refused to let him go. Eventually, they budged. Thankfully. I now live safely with both my pets, my dog Lucy and my cat Skurk (Norwegian for criminal, pretty much - sounds like a weird name in English but I promise you, he fits his name completely and everyone just finds it to be a cute, fitting name for him). I work and take care of them very well, more than I've seen most people do. I'm so glad that I kept fighting for us, that I never lost hope regardless of how dark it all seemed for years. I'll fight for my loved ones, my pets any time, any day. Always. ALWAYS.
    9
  90. 9
  91. 9
  92. 9
  93. 9
  94. 8
  95. 8
  96. 8
  97. 8
  98. 8
  99. 8
  100. 8
  101. 8
  102. 8
  103. 8
  104. 8
  105. 8
  106. 7
  107. 7
  108. 7
  109. 7
  110. 7
  111. 7
  112. 7
  113. Fr 😭😭😭 I live for my pets (cat and dog), my children as I call them. Call me crazy for that, I don't care. I view them as my children. Even if I just accidentaly manage to step on my dog's foot or something like that, I feel sooooo bad and start hugging and apologizing - even if she barely noticed. One time I was cutting my dog's hair (she doesn't shed her fur, she's allergy friendly so she practically has more human like hair, hence why I have to cut it) and I was getting tired as I had been cutting her for so long. I was tired, she was tired so she started moving around a bit making it harder for me to cut, so I accidentally managed to come close to her skin on her chest while cutting. It BARELY cut her at all, but I did hear her scream very high pitched (not for long at all, it was more of a "ouch" in dog language) so I threw the scissors right away that second and I started crying. I checked her to see how bad it was.. it didn't even start bleeding, it was more of a scratch. So luckily, it couldn't have been that painful. I'm sure it was painful that second, but like I said, it was tiny and didn't even bleed the slightest bit. I started bawling my eyes out, hugging her and all. She was wagging her tail as soon as I hugged her, so it couldn't have hurt much at all, and she understood that it was just a little accident, nothing on purpose at all. That just goes to show how much I love and care for my pets. Even the slightest little "could happen to the best"-things breaks my heart and makes me feel so bad. So, just the thought of doing something like this lady is doing - I could NEVER. It just breaks my heart so much. It doesn't matter at all whether I know the animals or not, seeing them hurt in even the slightest way is heartbreaking. I don't understand people that willfully aquires pets, only to not give them proper care and love. I've seen homeless people literally taking so much better care for their dogs than this lady/family has. Having a big home and a garden is worthless if you're not taking actual care for them. I live in not the smallest, yet surely not the biggest apartment (I've lived in much smaller places than now also) but that doesn't matter. They have space to move around in here and most importantly, they're properly fed with good food and have all that they need. I take my dog out for 3-5 times a day, depending on my energy, if I work that day and on the weather (I live in Norway so our winters are extremely cold lol, so we spend more time inside during winter than summer). They're happy, clean, fed, not too big or too small, healthy and everything. Having a big home and a garden means NOTHING to your pets if you don't take care of them. It's not adequate to just let them outside in the garden, never walking them. It sure is a great bonus to your pets if you have a big home and a garden if you actually take care of them. That's definetely a great bonus. But that's all it is. It's just a bonus that makes it a bit easier for you to exercise especially your dogs. Your garden doesn't take care of your pets, YOU take care of your pets. Smdh.
    7
  114. 7
  115. 7
  116. I completely understand what you're saying. I'm not severly allergic to anything myself, but I do literally suffer from pollen allergies during summer time, breathing is extremely difficult and I need a lot of medications for that to just barely be able to be outside - or even inside during summer. I don't go into anaphylaxis which sounds just horrifying to me. I know what it feels like having my throat closing up, not to the point where it's anaphylaxis, but even for me it's really scary when I feel like I can't breathe.. so I can at least sort of imagine what anaphylaxis would feel like. I also suffer from several mental illnesses, like heavy ptsd, anxiety disorder and panic attacks, and depression on and off (not due to seasonal change). I absolutely HATE when people are acting like this woman who exaggerates (my 1st language is Norwegian so I'm sorry if some words gets butchered) because it puts us that actually really struggle with one thing or another. I would still like to say in her little defense that she's been heavily exposed to toxins from her home, they apparantly found many spores of different allergens in her home - which alone can cause unusual behaviour. She's on medications as well, so that combo isn't exactly working in her favor. This was talked about in another clip from this, I don't have the link but it shouldn't be too hard to find. So at least for her, she has some validity with this. I believe her behaviour has been enabled too much and that the couple should have fixed whatever problems they have with their house a long time ago instead of accomidating her (mostly) irrational or overexagerrated behaviour. Not trying to defend her too much, but there's two sides of every coin and two sides to every story. Emphathy and compassion is extremely important. Not saying we should baby or enable people at all, we should just try to understand each other's points if views as much as possible. Not to excuse someone's irrational behaviour, but to understand. When people disagree with ourselves, we also would like for "the other side" to try ti understand their point of view and how they think to better understand what drives people's bad behaviour so that it's easier to prevent people from completely losing their minds. We can't help people if we don't understand how others think. You know what I mean? This became a long "rant", sorry about that.
    7
  117. 7
  118. 7
  119. 7
  120. 7
  121. 7
  122. 7
  123. 7
  124. 6
  125. I completely understand what people are critizing her for, but she does have some validity here. I'm not severly allergic to anything myself, but I do literally suffer from pollen allergies during summer time, breathing is extremely difficult and I need a lot of medications for that to just barely be able to be outside - or even inside during summer. I don't go into anaphylaxis which sounds just horrifying to me. I know what it feels like having my throat closing up, not to the point where it's anaphylaxis, but even for me it's really scary when I feel like I can't breathe.. so I can at least sort of imagine what anaphylaxis would feel like. I also suffer from several mental illnesses, like heavy ptsd, anxiety disorder and panic attacks, and depression on and off (not due to seasonal change). I absolutely HATE when people are acting like this woman who exaggerates (my 1st language is Norwegian so I'm sorry if some words gets butchered) because it puts us that actually really struggle with one thing or another. I would still like to say in her little defense that she's been heavily exposed to toxins from her home, they apparantly found many spores of different allergens in her home - which alone can cause unusual behaviour. She's on medications as well, so that combo isn't exactly working in her favor. This was talked about in another clip from this, I don't have the link but it shouldn't be too hard to find. So at least for her, she has some validity with this. I believe her behaviour has been enabled too much and that the couple should have fixed whatever problems they have with their house a long time ago instead of accomidating her (mostly) irrational or overexagerrated behaviour. Not trying to defend her too much, but there's two sides of every coin and two sides to every story. Emphathy and compassion is extremely important. Not saying we should baby or enable people at all, we should just try to understand each other's points if views as much as possible. Not to excuse someone's irrational behaviour, but to understand. When people disagree with ourselves, we also would like for "the other side" to try ti understand their point of view and how they think to better understand what drives people's bad behaviour so that it's easier to prevent people from completely losing their minds. We can't help people if we don't understand how others think. You know what I mean? This became a long "rant", sorry about that.
    6
  126. 6
  127. 6
  128. 6
  129. 6
  130. 6
  131. 6
  132. 6
  133. 6
  134. 6
  135. 6
  136. 6
  137. 6
  138. 6
  139. 5
  140. 5
  141. 5
  142. 5
  143. 5
  144. 5
  145. 5
  146. 5
  147. 5
  148. 5
  149. 5
  150. 5
  151. 5
  152. 5
  153. 5
  154. 5
  155. 5
  156. 5
  157. 5
  158. 5
  159. 5
  160. 5
  161. 4
  162. 4
  163. 4
  164. 4
  165. 4
  166. 4
  167. 4
  168. 4
  169. 4
  170. 4
  171. Totally.. there are other solutions. They CAN afford the lizard, they're priorities are just severly off. They don't need to feed it as much as they do. They also spend A LOT of unnesecary money elsewhere, like on the two cars and DAMN BRAND NAME CHILDREN'S CLOTHING. Even if they were to JUST cut down on clothing (stop buying brand clothes they'll grow out off instantly and make the kids share more; passing down clothes etc.), they'd save A LOT. They got the lizard, time to prioritize. I totally agree with letting it go to someone else with the funds to properly take care of it if they had already tried to prioritize, but couldn't make it work. If you actually can't afford your pet, the best thing to do 100% is to give it away to someone who'll care for it like it deserves. Them giving away the lizard because they fail to prioritize properly, like buying Tommy Hilfiger etc. is just extremely selfish. This is my issue here. I personally LOVE pets (I have both a dog and a cat and I want more), and there came a time where my economic situation got so tight that I had to pack up and leave my already cheap apartment to find somewhere cheaper to live (I'd already tried to cut back on EVERYTHING else, I at times had to go without food just to afford pet food), and had no choice but to rehome both my pets for well over a year. It broke my heart and I just couldn't stop crying, I'd cry myself to sleep thinking about them almost every night until I got them back. I still knew I had to do it for their sake, they deserve a properly caring home, which despite my extremely cheap living, I just couldn't afford it. I have them back now, thankfully. I made sure despite huge difficulties that I could get them back when I could. Point is, when you get pets, you have a duty of care. They're living creatures. If you're not prepared for the costs and constant responsibility, just don't get any pets at all. If you get pets and difficulties later occur, you do everything possible to make sure to prioritize properly. These people seem to care more about having a nice fasade than their pets. People like that should NOT have pets. They still do, and I hope they managed to prioritize life over damn stupid clothing etc. So, both points here are technically right and I don't get why y'all argue so much. It all depends on the situation. These people could obiviously afford the lizard, they just seem too vain to put the lizard before their appearance. Totally deplorable.
    4
  172. 4
  173. 4
  174. 4
  175. 4
  176. 4
  177. 4
  178. 4
  179. 4
  180. 4
  181. 4
  182. 4
  183. 4
  184. 4
  185. 4
  186. 4
  187. 4
  188. 4
  189. 4
  190. 4
  191. 4
  192. 4
  193. 4
  194. 4
  195. 4
  196. 4
  197. That's absolutely very true, and many people don't understand this at all. I've been struggling with this myself a lot. I've been r*ped twice, once at 14 y/o (by a 18 y/o) and once at 18 y/o (by a 44 y/o). It's terrible to dissociate like that. It's a total nightmare. Many people refuse to believe me when I explain what sometimes happens to me, which makes me feel so extremely alone. It's been a few years now since the last one happened as I'm 23 y/o now, but it still haunts me, and I'm sure it will for many, many more years to come. I can't say that it hasn't gotten better over time, but it's going slowly. I'm not getting any help. No therapy, no medications, nothing. I'm chronically afraid and feel like I'm always at the verge of crying, with little relief ever. The only relief I can get my hands on are drugs, so that's become my solution. I understand that drugs only help temporarily, while only making it all worse in the long run, but.. I don't feel like I have a choice. It's such a double edged sword. It helps right then and there, but it'll only cut me even deeper the more I keep self-medicating. I've ended up dead due to an overdose on fentanyl-laced heroin, rivotril, oxazepam, xanax, valium, ghb and alcohol. Thankfully, someone got to me in time and managed to get some life back into me by doing extreme CPR for a very long time, until the ambulance came and took over and brought me to the ICU on life support. All my ribs were broken, which obiviously hurt a lot for some weeks after, but dang.. I'd take that over death most days, absolutely. You're (most likely) not doing CPR right if you don't break at least one rib. That's just part of the process, and kinda the point. Well, the point is to push so hard that you're "manually" beating the heart for that person recieving it. So I'm just saying, if you ever have to do CPR, don't be afraid to push hard/break something! That person's dead anyway, so it's not like you're doing any harm. On the other hand, what will do someone harm, is if you don't do it at all for whatever reason. That decreases their risk of surviving a great deal. Also, before doing CPR, make sure the person actually have no pulse. You will harm someone if you do CPR on someone that's simply unconcious. So it's important to check their pulse first, while you're calling an ambulance. The dispatcher will guide you on what to do. ((Sorry, I just had to. Many people are afraid of doing CPR, but don't be, as long as you can't feel any pulse. CPR saves lives!! You'll most likely recieve a "thanku!!" if you save them, despite how many ribs you crack. Better to have broken ribs than being dead!)) Anyways. The other side of the sword is that without drugs, I'd probably be in too much pain to manage to keep going in life. So, what saves me is what kills me. I hate being so terribly haunted by this, as it feels like they're still winning. They still hold power over my life, despite the second monster that assaulted me (for two damn days straight, nearly killing me) being in prison now, since I filed charges and managed to get him convicted (which is truly a blessing, considering how many victims/survivors don't even get their case reviewed. Most people are not believed, which is extremely sad. That sets such a bad precedent, practically giving abusers the message that they'll most likely get away with even the most heinous assaults. So, that was truly a bittersweet victory, as there really aren't any winners in the end. I don't know what to do anymore. I need help, but nobody's willing to reach their hands out. All I get is doors slammed in my face.
    4
  198. 4
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. 3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 3
  233. 3
  234. 3
  235. 3
  236. 3
  237. 3
  238. 3
  239. 3
  240. 3
  241. 3
  242. 3
  243. 3
  244. 3
  245. 3
  246. 3
  247. 3
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277.  @jaybee1248  And? There are MANY states that do things and have laws and regulations that are HELLA weird. So.. the fact that some states in one (developed) country does something, makes it right? Is that it? There's a reason (well, several) most states in America as well as no other developed country uses lie detector tests as proof in court. Remember that even the person that made those things up, says they don't really work (as intented). It's also important to note that even if the test was always 100% accurate, they only detect what the test subject PERCIEVES to be truthful, not what's ACTUALLY true. Like.. say you were to believe that the sky was green, not blue. You're subjected to that test, and the question is if the sky is blue, you'll answer no. The test will pick that up as truthful, despite how false it really is. See the point? It's understandable to use during investigations, but not as factual evidence in court, as it proves nothing. It's way too subjective. What some states in America do doesn't set the standard for what's right and fair. If what you're saying is true, then those states act irresponsibly. Most people really think that lie detector tests are a good and valid tool, when they're really not. So when a test is admitted and presented as evidence in court in front of a jury obvs consisting of "regular" citizens, they can be easily swayed by just that, as many people think they work really well, and is actual evidence and factual. It can truly cause innocent people wrongful convictions, as well as guilty people getting free. Allowing lie detector tests as part of the evidence should be cause for a mistrial, but that won't happen and the verdict won't be fair if they're allowed in court.
    2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286.  @xgengx7530  IF you're already predisposed, then yes. Otherwise, no. This has been researched quite a lot. Drugs (including weed) has the potential to trigger things like scizophrenia. The thing is tho, it still isn't the weed's fault. If weed doesn't trigger it, something else surely will at some point. Although this is fairly rare, that's what CAN have the possibility to become harmful. We simply don't know what we're predisposed to and what is going to trigger that. That's what makes any drug use scary. Although I advocate for all drugs to at least be decriminalized and for weed to be legalized, I still think that if you're able to stay away from whatever drugs, then do so. Still, as long as you're aware of both the potential pros and cons, wait 'til you're a certain age and do it responsibly, go right ahead. For many people, weed can be absolutely great - even life saving. If you for instance have epilepsy that is hard to control, there's nothing wrong with trying weed as long as your doctor is well informed on it and have thought of and tried other treatments first. This is till individual tho. In other cases, say you're heavily addicted to hard drugs like heroin, meth, pills etc. and you find quitting everything is too hard, there's nothing wrong with smoking weed if that's what keeps you from going back to a highly dangerous lifestyle. So this is all individual. It's good or even life changing/saving for some, but for other people it's not at all good. So it's impossible to say that weed is either good or bad in general. I guess I'd say that weed is at least not harmful in MOST people (doing it responsibly, this is key), but it would be stupid and ignorant of me ti say that it's ALWAYS good. Weed in it's own nature isn't harmful at all. It's all the other possible factors that can make weed seem bad. Yet, just because someone has bad reactions to it doesn't mean that weed is dangerous. Nothing is that black and white. An analogy I like to use is to think about allergies. Just because some people can get severe allergic reactions to whatever (grass, peanuts, apples, dogs, cats etc.) doesn't mean that dogs etc. are bad. Hope this makes sense.
    2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. Although the financial part is obvs extremely important, what's even more important is for the child to grow up in a safe and stable enviroment. Letting kids live in whatever kind of chaos is abusive. They notice and understand sooo much more than many people think. They learn their behaviours more by their parents actions, than their words. "If mommy does it, I can do it". "Daddy's hitting mommy, that's what daddy's do".. and so forth. It's so much better for any child to grow up with less money and just "stuff" than "having it all" without any stability, certainty and safety. A child is better off with one parent that loves and cares for them, living in a shelter than living in a big house with one or two parents that pays no attention to them, with parents who fights, both verbally and/or physically, emotionally distant parents etc. The child doesn't care about if they have the best and most toys, the prettiest clothes, high-end food, nice furniture, all of that. That doesn't matter. They're perfectly happy with just the basics. As long as their needs are met and they are and feel loved and safe, having the certainty that no matter what, they have a loving, protecting parent. If possible, sure, having a two-parent household in their own house/apartment, financial security and love and affection from parents who also are loving and affectionate towards each other is ideal, but having that "white picket fence"-dream is just a dream for most people. Although that's what many people want, they simply can't have it. So as long as the kid(s) always comes first and they are secure and properly nurtured, they don't really need more than that. Stability, safety, security, love and care is what matters. Not the money. I'm not saying to go ahead and just get a baby despite being too poor to ensure their safety, health and wellbeing, not at all. Getting your stuff together and knowing that you can take good care of both yourself and your kid(s) should be a priority before getting pregnant. People should never just get a baby and "figure it out" as they go. Not at all, that's extremely irresponsible. You're creating life, after all. I'm just making the important point that money alone will never be good enough on it's own.
    2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. Right, wth!? 500-600 dollars is EXTREMELY cheap for a dog. I spend way more a year on just my cat, smh. I always try to stay as cheap as I can due to my low income + me having to care for both my cat and my dog, but if there's one thing I'll always make sure is quality, is PET FOOD. I usually buy food for my cat online, because where I live, the only options for cat food I have is either very cheap, low quality food or I have to go to a crazy expensive vet/animal store that doesn't even for the most part have that much better food than what I find in the grocery store..:/ So I order online. Sometimes if my money situation is really tight and I couldn't order more cat food in time or the delivery is late, I have no choice but to find something else.. even though that luckily doesn't happen a lot, I feel so bad for having to buy him something else which I know isn't too good.. I obvs try to find the best of the worst and I've found ONE option which is neither good or bad, it's just okay.. I feel so bad those times, despite him luckily getting good and proper nutrition most of the time. Then I see other people with pets who just couldn't give a single damn and just buys the cheapest of the cheapest store brands! 😱 Like, WAY WORSE than Friskies etc. I could NEVER! Even if I suddenly had NO money, I wouldn't do that! I'd literally just steal something at least a little bit better. Whatever I need to do. A lot of people just doesn't seem to understand that food/nutrition is directly linked to long term health. The better nutrition they get, the less likely you are to have to spend loads of money, heart ache and trouble for your beloved animal along the line. They demand so little from us, the absolute least we can do for them is to give them proper nutrition. That's the VERY LEAST we can do. I don't understand how Phil managed to get that severly low average number for yearly costs of one dog. I know this episode is old, but c'mon it's not THAT old! You'd gave to go a lot further back in time than this to get to those numbers.
    2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. I mean, I get and do believe in white privilege but there surely are exceptions. I've been personally and know of MANY white people who can't feel safe from harrassment, questions on how you can afford this or that and such. I think class has a lot to do with this. What I mean by this, is that there surely are groups of/including white people who get criminalized in unfair ways, just because of looks or social status. Drug addicts and (noticable) mentally ill people, homeless people, people with downs syndrome and such. Those groups gets disenfranchised heavily as well, yet we ignore that. I think class has A LOT to do with it. I would certainly say that a rich black man has more privilege than a white, homeless drug addict. This goes to show the effects on class privilege. We don't talk about this. We ignore this issue. This does NOT delegitimize white privilege, but claiming there aren't exeptions is just ignorant. Saying all white people have privilege.. no. It's important to talk about class privilege as well, the two are not mutually exclusive or deligitimize the other. Now, take a homeless drug addict that is BLACK and a homeless drug addict that is WHITE. Certainly the white homeless drug addict has a bigger advantage in that situation, due to white privilege. This is partly what makes this complicated. Now, in this situation, although the white person would have an inherent advantage on the black person, it doesn't mean that all white people get treated better than all black people. Would you say a rich, black man has less privilege than the poor white man? I would not. This is why I think privilege has many factors to it and that it's on a spectrum. It's complicated, but I hope this view on it all can start a thinking process in some people. Don't tell me that the white, homeless drug addict has more privilege than LeBron James or Beyoncé. Get my point? Two things can exist, coexist and conflict at the same time. Nothing is (no pun intended) so black or white.
    2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. Yeah lol he really took that way out of proportion. Ofc both vaping and smoking cigarettes is really, really bad for your health (and surely your wallet), but we all know that. She too. She have the choice to smoke if she wants to, just not in front of her child. Her child didn't consent to that. Her health is getting affected, and she doesn't have any choice in the matter. If parents want to smoke, do it somewhere else, preferrably outside so the smoke doesn't stay indoors. Having your young child right next to you in bed while you're smoking is just straight up terrible and selfish. Just don't do it. Not only with regards to second hand-smoke, but it's also displaying irresponsible behaviour. That's normalizing smoking, indirectly telling your child that smoking is okay. It's not. It's better to vape than use actual cigarettes, but still. It's just not good. I'm a long-time heavy smoker myself, I was addicted by the time I was 13 y/o. When I was young, my father was a smoker (he quit when I was around 10 y/o). He didn't smoke inside that often, but he smoked on the balcony where I always used to follow him, because I liked the smell, lol. My grandparents (father's parents) were heavy smokers as well, and they did not care about where they smoked at all. Me and my brother often went on trips with them, and when we were driving in their small car with only four seats, they smoked the entire time they were driving and barely had the windows open, so the entire car was literally packed with a massive cloud of smoke. This is most likely the reason I started smoking (so damn early as well, I believe my first cigarette was smoked at 11 y/o and it became daily at 13 y/o..). I'm even smoking a cigarette right now as I'm typing this, lol. I started smoking weed as well when I was 14-15 (still do, and I refuse to quit! Weed is good for my soul hahahh, couldn't do without it). So.. yeah. Be careful with what habits you're exhibiting to your kids. Kids won't "do as they say, not as they do". You have the right to harm your own body, but not anyone else's. That's not okay.
    1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. It's truly horrible. I've died of an overdose myself, not as a kid but still very young. I was only 20, and I've had several other OD's. The first OD I had I was about 18. The one where I died tho, that was absolutely terrible. I locked myself in a bathroom in a charity-place where you could sleep, eat and get much more help. I didn't intend to overdose, just to be clear. I only locked the door because I wanted privacy while shooting up heroin. I'd already had a lot to drink, as well as probably around (seriously) 80 rivotril, 10-15 valium and a few xanax. This was usual for me. I was going to sleep, and I took some more heroin than usual (I'd just bought the heroin and wasn't aware of how strong it was), not a lot more heroin than usual but just what you'd call a "sleep dose". I needed extra because I'd taken a lot of amphetamine throughout the day.. it simply ended up being too much of that extremely strong heroin. For all I know it could've been laced with fentanyl, but I'm not sure. Luckily a few other people notified the staff because they started getting concerned apparantly, so the staff ended up having to kick the door in. They immidiatly started doing extremely good CPR and called the ambulance. All my ribs got broken, so that's how I know they really did good CPR and that it took a lot to get a pulse. Remember this, people. If you're ever in a situation where there's no pulse and you have to do CPR, do NOT hesitate because literally each second is a matter of life or death. Remember that life in exchange for some broken ribs is as worth it as anything can be worth it. When you're doing CPR, the point is to try to "fake" a heart beat. You have to push hard enough, you're not doing it right unless you actually damage the ribs. Just saying. I've been trained several times. In those situations, you either choose between trying to save someone who's already dead, so you're not ever doing more harm than good when doing CPR. Also remember that you only do CPR when there's no pulse, so make sure you check the neck and wrists if you're uncertain whether the person is simply unconcious or actually DEAD. CPR should only be used when there's no pulse, not when someone's simply unconcious. It' easy to check and see if there's a pulse. If you're alone and someone has lost their pulse (or if they're unconcious) the first thing you do is call an ambulance. They'll guide you all the way. Call the ambulance and if the pulse is non-existent, do CPR and DO NOT worry about breaking ribs. The person is DEAD. The person's survival rate is way bigger the harder you push, use your body weight to help you. CPR should go in the tune of the song "staying alive", ironically enough. Remember, "ha, ha, ha, ha, staying alive, staying alive". Hope you all are doing okay, and that you'll never have to do any of this. It's just important to know.
    1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512.  @j.c985  No. There will always be exceptions, but no. Smoking is WAY better than alcohol and it helps A LOT of people overcoming much harder addictions. Sure, cannabis is a drug but drugs are not inherently bad, as many people like to claim. Sure, you could say that about heroin, meth etc. Not weed tho. It's not for everyone and I would never encourage ANY type of drug to ANYONE unless the situation calls for it, which it sometimes does. Many of my friends have managed quitting or reducing their intake by using weed instead. It's helped many people including myself, a long time drug addict, with my heroin, amphetamine, benzo addiction and many other things.. I've just about done it all. I have had several overdoses, and I've died. I've been homeless for many years combined, I've just about RUINED practically all my veins due to excessive use of needles, the list goes on. I've been stuck at the bottom a scary amount of times, for long times. My family and friends had to start preparing for my FUNERAL, my will and everything. To all of us it was just a matter of time. Today, I'm on buprenorphine (heroin "blocker" and replacement), anxiety medication and smoke weed. That good cbd hashish. Really relaxes me, helps my PTSD, anxiety, depression, insomnia and physical pains. If I really struggle w/ not using hard drugs and needles, I smoke my brains out and either fall asleep or munch my entire kitchen, laughing at anything and everything. It's all about harm reduction. Many times, almost all of the time it's too big of a goal to quit EVERYTHIG, at least at once. It's obiviously a lot better what I'm doing now than what I did before. I'm now a board member in an organization for the welfare of drug addicts, with a focus on harm reduction instead of pushing people to sober up. We've found that that (most of the time) has WAY better results. It doesn't matter if you can't quit absolutely everything, the chance of successfull recovery or at least reduction of heavy intake is a lot higher if you not only allow time to take baby steps, not "punishing" yourself if you have a setback, and encouraging people that are really trying instead of knocking them further down if you relapse. Compassion first. If we push people too hard it's way too easy to not feel adequate enough, only pushing you down further, maybe all the way down to no point of return. Compassion and emphathy is crucial. Support is crucial. Would we rather want heavy addicts smoke some weed or completely ruin not only their own life, but damage the well being of those who care for and love the struggling person? I'd say bring in the weed.
    1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1