Comments by "Ida Larsen" (@idalarsen2540) on "JCS - Criminal Psychology" channel.

  1. 27
  2. 18
  3. I have been interrogated (not for murder tho lol), one case was due to me being raped and the other one was me getting into a SMALL fight with some cops while I was heavily drugged (used to be an addict). This technique was used on me both times while guestioned. I struggle with anxiety and panic attacks a lot, and this was the absolute worst part of the interrogation. Not because I lied in either case, honesty is the best policy so I was as truthful as one can possibly be.. yet this was still absolutely horrifying. I'm usually not the type to find silence awkward, yet this time it was so scary because I thought they didn't believe me. Especially in the rape case, because I admitted guilt right away in my little fight with the police. In the rape case tho, I knew what had happened, the rape was extreme; I nearly died ffs. I was so scared that my anxiety would send the wrong signals destroying my credibility and chances at putting someone truly awful away in jail. Luckily I managed through and won that case (I obvs lost the police fight case, but I never even bothered trying to win that one, so). I feel like it CAN be a great tool for police to use, but not all the time. I feel like it can send the wrong signals from someone that doesn't respond well to scare tactics, like me. I start fidgeting, scratching, sweating, avoid eye contact and many typical signs of guilt, even tho for me they're not a reaction of guilt but a reaction of anxiety. Anxiety does not equal guilt. So although I understand that it CAN be affective, I feel like it bears the potential of incriminating or disregarding innocent people telling the truth.
    10
  4. 9
  5. 8
  6. 7
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 3
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 1
  16.  @totovader  What are you even talking about and pressing me on it? I haven't even watched a single video. All I did was reply that the issues listed as part of the topics this dude I've never even heard of talks about are important. As in those issues being important to talk about. I didn't say anything about any of his opinions or videos, because once again, I've never even heard about the channel before, nor seen any of his videos. Is that wrong to state, now? Is it controversial or bothersome to you that I find certain topics interesting and worth talking about? You're surely getting overly hysterical over the most insignificant stuff. Why would I bother replying to you pressing me over something I'm apparantly supposed to just take your word for actually is this youtuber comments? As if I said that the long quote you pulled from wherever was "awesome" and "interesting", CLEARLY taking my words COMPLETELY out of context? There's absolutely no reason for me to "explain" how an out of context-statement/quote of some youtuber I'm completely unfamiliar with is "awesome and important", since once again, you're using my words entirely out of context. I neither agree or disagree with anything that he's said, because I have zero basis to form an opinion on about his videos, other than the brief explenation I got over what kind of topics he discuss. There's no relation between me finding certain topics interesting and someone else's opinion on any of those topics. I gotta say, you seem highly emotional and triggered by this when there's no need to get this riled up. You, the one accusing someone else of not being able to form a "thought", whatever that's supposed to mean, seem really confused yourself, considering how quick you are to jump the gun instead of actually properly understanding the comments you're replying to. If only you were able to breathe and calm down a bit, you'd possibly be able to see how irrationally bothered you are over nothing, and how your replies to me have been made by you drawing quick conclusions and assumptions over what you think my opinions are. You're really stretching here, lol. Unlike you, actual context and actual relevancy matters to me. I only state opinions that I've thought through, with all it's related context, to ensure my opinions are based on knowledge; not ignorant assumptions gathered from thin air. I recommend you try it. It really makes everything a whole lot easier, less confusing and harder to misunderstand. Just saying.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1