Comments by "Ida Larsen" (@idalarsen2540) on "The Daily Show" channel.

  1. Thanku!!! The entire GLOBE knows and reckognizes the sport as FOOTBALL. Soccer comes from just ONE NATION, yet they wanna complain when we call actual football.. FOOTBALL. America coining our term as their own for their own little game is hysterical.
    1
  2.  @AmandaFromWisconsin  Right, so one or two countries that doesn't even participate with the rest of the massive world's football should dictate what we, who actually play and arrange this sport (almost) enitrely globally, call our sport? It's not called "soccer". We play football.
    1
  3. Invaded for *water*!? Excuse me, what? Like, I've known that the driving factor for wars have been oil, not "making them be a democracy" or whatever. But.. water? Really? Smh our world is doomed.
    1
  4. We know this, the problem is more that people are too stubborn. That's why finding other solutions is a good way to go about it.
    1
  5.  @PWNINSWAGMASTER  Oh please.
    1
  6.  @PWNINSWAGMASTER  I'm an atheist. Don't claim you know more about atheism than I do. You can't simply disregard official or "legal" definitions. ATHEISTS. DO. NOT. BELIVE. IN. ANY. GOD. Philosofical thinking is not the same. You can't philosofically redefine something. Would you enjoy it if I were to "philosofically" redefine your supposed god? Claim that theism is something other than it actually is? You wouldn't enjoy it. Stop being ignorant and redefining things for your own sake and claim it's all "philosofical". Philosofy doesn't change facts.
    1
  7.  @PWNINSWAGMASTER  I AM objective. You just don't agree with me. I find it more hostile that you get so worked up from me simply explaining what being an atheist actually mean. That's all I said, I haven't been hostile at all. No need to repeat your comment, I can read. It's just extremely frustrating that you're trying to argue with me about this. All I said was what the ACTUAL definition of atheism is, but you just talk about.. philosophy. What does an atheist mean? A(nti) theist. Sort of. Same concept as with asexuality. You're a theist and I'm NOT theist (atheist). I don't believe in any god. That's it. Atheism isn't about lacking some understanding or something, it's simply NOT believing in any god/s. Going back to my point with asexuality (not saying (a)sexuality has anything to do with this topic, but in terms of literacy it compares. Sexuality is sexuality, theism is theism. The "a" added before sort of means "not". Hence why atheism means not theist. You get my point now? You can think and wonder as much as you want, I'm just stating what the word ACTUALLY means. Philosophy does not equal fact. I'm not saying philosophies CAN'T turn out to be true, all I'm saying is that there is no need for you or anyone to add definitions.
    1
  8.  @PWNINSWAGMASTER  Can you agree with me that atheism means not believing in any god/s? That's LITERALLY all I'm trying to get at.
    1
  9.  @PWNINSWAGMASTER  .. why do you keep posting the same comment?
    1
  10.  @PWNINSWAGMASTER  I'll ask again. Can you agree on the ONE point that atheism means a lack of belief in any god/s?
    1
  11.  @mlggamer5296  I understood that. I was simply referring to americans when saying "you", not YOU directly;)
    1
  12. cough audience cough
    1
  13. Fr tho 😂😂 They sure love their bikes, and that's good.
    1
  14. I just wish you replaced Kimmel with Meyers, even frckn Corden for that matter - but, at least you didn't include the constant laugher that even laughs at his terrible jokes.
    1
  15. ANYONE, straight, bi, gay, trans, male, female can have HIV etc. Many say it's scientifically valid for these rules to be put in place because apparantly people that to anal are more likely to have these illnesses (I don't know if it's true or not so don't come after me if that's false, please). Several straight people do anal as well. If anything they could check for illnesses before collecting the plasma. It's not like only gay folks can have these illnesses. I also saw someone commenting that even if you have HIV or smthn it can be cleared out so the blood is clean. If that's true that's cool, but if anything, maybe there should be a routine check up (regarldess of sex, gender and sexuality) before giving plasma/blood, to eliminate that risk completely. Idk, just a thought. NOT AT ALL saying these regulations for gay men are valid or okay in any way, I hope you got my point here.
    1
  16. ..lotion the eyebrows?
    1
  17. Where is Trevor tho? 😭
    1
  18.  @AC-jy8kv  People that cares about football don't care about Americans calling it silly "soccer". We, aka the entire globe excluding America, are in on the games, battling it out in EURO2020 literally RIGHT NOW. We don't even think about America and their silliness, esoecially not now during EM or the upcoming WM. Don't flatter yourself. We're continuing our football games perfectly fine. Americans are just salty at football for not being included, despite them excluding themselves from the rest of the globe.
    1
  19.  @ruehem3219  Damn so where do we find this cocaine in prostitutes? 😂💀💀💀
    1
  20.  @1adamgarcia2003  Get the fuck outta here. He might have been on vacation to SA or something, enough with these damn conspiracies
    1
  21. @Thomas Bell Yeah, I know. I do report a lot of stuff, not to be an extreme Karen or whatever, that's not me at all. Still, some things are just annoying to constantly see. It's tireing (English isn't my 1st language so excuse possible mistakes) and unnesecary, but some things are worth reporting, really. I know it rarely does any good, tho.. I still do it just do have done it.
    1
  22.  @Sam-handwich583  ¡¿¿¿¿¿¿¿???¡¿¡¿?¿???... huhh? Those two sentences were so incredibly confusing that I can't even gather some reasonable words to find a reasonable reply myself. Wow, that takes skills.. congratulations, dude. I feel like I must applaud you for that achievement. It's hard to make a couple of even short sentences that meaningless, making ot impossible for me to resist pointing it out. After reading whatever that was, I couldn't jusr let it go.. move on. I couldn't do it. I now literally feel entitled to an explanation, so I don't have to lay awake all night, analyzing your attempt at formulating something that was supposed to be two english sentences, so I can comtinue my life without the agony of trying to understand something so insanely impossible to understand. Please help me, I'm confused, in agony, unable to rest and find peace. This is serious. This truly is a great mystery that needs to be solved pronto. I'm not okay.. this was the last straw that finally completely broke me. Without an answer, a proper exolanation, I'll have to be admitted to the psych ward, and die suffering. This is serious business. WHY ARE YOU SO EVIL, FORCING SUCH TORTURE UPON INNOCENT PEOPLE!?!?¿!???!?¿!!!¿¿?!?!?!¿¿¿?!!?!??¿!???¿!???¿!¿¿¿!?!!!+??¿??? THIS. IS. NOT. OKAY. I NEED ANSWERS. I DESERVE ANSWERS!!!!!!! NOW!!!
    1
  23.  @victorcallender1311  Pitch forks.. and, uh.. weed? What?
    1
  24. Yeah.. I mean.. I totally get where she's coming from and all that, and I absolutely agree that we need to seriously reimagine what policing in America looks like, but I don't believe completely getting rid of all policing is the solution. It's absolutely impossible to get rid of all crime, so we do need law enforcement to do just that - enforce the law. I'm totally for the concept of dradtically shrinking the police funding and number of police, and instead offer strong social programs that prevents crime from happening.. but even in the most utopic and safe world, crime will never be eradicated. We should absolutely focus more on prevention, that's key to true reform and justice.. but that's complicated, and requires reform on not just policing, but every other aspect of governing. That includes ensuring affordable and quality housing for every single person, ensuring affordable/free, quality and accessable health care to again literally every single person, ensuring every single person quality employment with quality pay, the list goes on.. you get the idea. The thing is though, even with all these things in place, you'll never be able to 100% prevent all crime. Proper policing is not just about preventing crime, but bringing justice when it occurs, which it always inevitably will. That's just the sad reality. We need reasonable solutions that actually makes sense. American policing today is totally indefensable, and it needs to drastically and systematically change. We need to look more at alternatives to deal with homeless people, domestic disputes, drug issues, mental health crisis', and all non-violent offenses, but as well look critically at all existing laws, and reevaluate what we deem illegal and not. Prison reform is also massively important, as well as complete drug reform. Policing is a massive issue, but by far not the only issue. Police unions needs drastic change as well. I just think that colmpletely aboloshing the police isn't reasonable.. a dradtic reduction on the other hand is reasonable AND necessary. Redistributing funding is as well - that's one of the more attainable solutions to the issue at large. Social programs supporting lifting people up and out of desperation, homelessness, health issues including drug addiction and all of these things are real solutions that can be done. Completely aboloshing the police simply isn't realistic. I certainly wish that COULD be a reality, but that's wishful thinking. We need to look at other solutions. I recommend looking at how other countries, those with the least amount of crime are doing policing.. they're obiviously doing something right, and have figured out great stuff that America hasn't yet. That includes getting money and "lobbying", aka legal bribery out of politics, so real solutions CAN take place, instead of quality, meaningful policies being dead at arrival due to police unions, prison "lobbyists" etc. bribing politicians to not change anything. Money in politics is what we keep coming back to - it truly is the root of all evil, and the thing that mostly obstructs progress from taking place.
    1
  25. Defunding is not about eliminating, tho. I understand how it can sound that way, but everyone in their right mind knows that we HAVE to have police around. Just not at all to the extent it is now.
    1
  26. Logical? Nah. I mean.. I totally get where she's coming from and all that, and I absolutely agree that we need to seriously reimagine what policing in America looks like, but I don't believe completely getting rid of all policing is the solution. It's absolutely impossible to get rid of all crime, so we do need law enforcement to do just that - enforce the law. I'm totally for the concept of dradtically shrinking the police funding and number of police, and instead offer strong social programs that prevents crime from happening.. but even in the most utopic and safe world, crime will never be eradicated. We should absolutely focus more on prevention, that's key to true reform and justice.. but that's complicated, and requires reform on not just policing, but every other aspect of governing. That includes ensuring affordable and quality housing for every single person, ensuring affordable/free, quality and accessable health care to again literally every single person, ensuring every single person quality employment with quality pay, the list goes on.. you get the idea. The thing is though, even with all these things in place, you'll never be able to 100% prevent all crime. Proper policing is not just about preventing crime, but bringing justice when it occurs, which it always inevitably will. That's just the sad reality. We need reasonable solutions that actually makes sense. American policing today is totally indefensable, and it needs to drastically and systematically change. We need to look more at alternatives to deal with homeless people, domestic disputes, drug issues, mental health crisis', and all non-violent offenses, but as well look critically at all existing laws, and reevaluate what we deem illegal and not. Prison reform is also massively important, as well as complete drug reform. Policing is a massive issue, but by far not the only issue. Police unions needs drastic change as well. I just think that colmpletely aboloshing the police isn't reasonable.. a dradtic reduction on the other hand is reasonable AND necessary. Redistributing funding is as well - that's one of the more attainable solutions to the issue at large. Social programs supporting lifting people up and out of desperation, homelessness, health issues including drug addiction and all of these things are real solutions that can be done. Completely aboloshing the police simply isn't realistic. I certainly wish that COULD be a reality, but that's wishful thinking. We need to look at other solutions. I recommend looking at how other countries, those with the least amount of crime are doing policing.. they're obiviously doing something right, and have figured out great stuff that America hasn't yet. That includes getting money and "lobbying", aka legal bribery out of politics, so real solutions CAN take place, instead of quality, meaningful policies being dead at arrival due to police unions, prison "lobbyists" etc. bribing politicians to not change anything. Money in politics is what we keep coming back to - it truly is the root of all evil, and the thing that mostly obstructs progress from taking place.
    1
  27. .. they don't really look alike tho lol
    1
  28. Nah. We drink delicious black coffee brewed perfectly by proper quality beans here in Norway. It's just you, America who's been spoonfed sugar in literally everything your entire lives, so your taste buds aren't used to our regular pallettes.
    1
  29.  @irisprince4744  EXACTLY. Anyone should be able to see that what happened on January 6th was in fact a terrorist attack. It's gross that so many people, INCLUDING PEOPLE IN CONGRESS, LITERAL LAWMAKERS, deny what happened, and even want to give credit to those terrorists. It's beyond evil.
    1
  30.  @gaming4yall  Not that I can remember. That's all i said. Nothing to argue about;)
    1
  31.  @aleree201296  Uhm what the actual-
    1
  32.  @aleree201296  Must be hard to breathe while talking through your ass. Stop spewing misinformation. Are you really trying to deflect blame for a president who incited a (failed) insurrection while important governmental work was going on? People died. All in one day. No one from BLM is trying to overthrow the government. They're protesting. Isn't it.. funny how when the critisism is on the police, you people deflect by claiming "there's always a few bad apples everywhere, you can't blame the entire police for something a few people might've done" (if and when you even care to acknowledge that it actually happens), but as soon as it is with regards to BLM and such, you blame literally EVERYONE who's merely using their 1st amendment rights (which you "care" so much about..) to protest? The sheer hypocracy is glaringly disgusting. You don't even try to hide it anymore. Your credibility is zero by this point. You dare excuse the happenings, the terror attack that happened January 6th, but in the same breath you have no regard for those who's suffered by the hands of the police and the government. How dare you people talk about the importance of freedom and the constitution when you only want it applied to your benefit. It's absolutely disgusting.
    1
  33.  @b.ballooon9225  Lol chill dude. You don't have to take everything that damn serious. How fragile. Are you even able to laugh a bit at yourself? I specified for context as well as in a jokingly way to play on all the "as a white male, we do not claim this person" kind of comments you see somewhere. Also, Norwegian and American culture is quite different so I very well may not at all share the same experiences as specifically white Americans. No need to get butthurt.
    1
  34.  @kwombok  That legit seems like both a very fair and valid analysis.
    1
  35. Yup, it's just wrong. A footballer not even mentioning EM (that's literally going on RIGHT NOW) during an interview about football is just weird. Americans wanna dish football, or their silly term for it - "soccer", yet get so mad when they're not included, while they're the ones that excluded themselves. Ugh. I don't want America meddling in our most beautiful, globally uniting sport. They'd ruin it.
    1
  36. This is literally just a scam of the entire american population. Democracy theathre.
    1
  37. I've got one word for ya - FASCISM. It's back in full swing. Brace yourselves for impact and keep fighting for DEMOCRACY. Keep voting democratic, progressive whenever it's possible. Even an establishment/corporate democrat is better than the blatantly evil (non-)alternative, the fascist party, formely known as the GOP, then GQP, aka the Repukelikkkunt party. Unfortunately, democrats aren't exactly providing any reasons for you to vote for them. However, that is FAR BETTER than just allowing democracy to perish.. and that's EXACTLY what you'll get by not voting for democrats. They're at the very least not actively trying to take away your rights and democracy at large. The bar is honestly incredibly low, but in order for progress to even be possible, fascism cannot take a hold. Whatever you do, contonue voting anti-fascist.
    1
  38.  @frandavis1990  explain what?
    1
  39.  @cardboard5689  It's the 11th now tho, no new video?
    1
  40. Def a long time ago.
    1
  41.  @Smulpaap123  That's just bullshit. Excuse me, but that's complete bullshit. - outsider looking in, myself. The point in impeachment is not only getting someone out of office, that's already done, so that's not the problem. The problem is setting a precedent and holding someone accountable, as well as preventing someone from holding office again (+ the country not wanting to pay even more taxes to someone that doesn't care about the tax payers at all, considering amongst other things that he's barely paid taxes). THAT'S THE POINT. Also, blaming democrats for this is like blaming a rape victim for being raped. Do you remember (most) democrats/liberals actually giving him a fair chance at holding the office with respect? They did that, but now that they've done that for too long they have no choice but to go down hard in this. To show that this is not okay. We're not talking about jaywalking here. This is big stuff. Holding someone accountable does not equal disregarding unity. The democrats tried teaching for unity and some common ground when the former "president" took office, DESPITE him actually losing the popular vote. This time, despite Biden actually WINNING the popular vote, republikkkans refuse to even give the new leaders a chance. Answer me this - how is THAT helping to unify ANYTHING? Stop blaming democrats/libs for everything while not expecting the same from republikkkans. You KNOW* that if the tables were flipped, republikkkans would have a completely different tone than they do now. How can you claim you want unity when "your" (not saying yours personally) party promotes dangerous lies about fraud that have been disproven time and time again AND several republikkkans (both regular citizens and politicians) speak about medieval executions, like hanging their opponents? PLEASE TELL ME HOW THAT IS SUPPOSED TO UNIFY ANYONE BECAUSE I CAN'T, AND NO OTHER REASONABLE HUMAN BEING CAN. PLEASE. TELL. ME. -edit, writing error.
    1
  42. What?
    1
  43. @Myth Tree Get outta here and read some (non-right, science and study-based) books.
    1
  44.  @greedo2660  Aka Faux news, as in false news..
    1
  45.  Nina Razzo  "Invented" excuse me but no one invented weed. Well, I guess you could say nature invented it but still. It's a plant. 🌿🌱✊
    1
  46. I`m not trying to defend it or anything, it`s awful. It`s just an analysis.
    1
  47.  @atsunymphae2723  Thank you!
    1
  48.  ME Rivera  I`m so glad I don`t live in the US, geez. "Land of the free", my ass. America don`t know what freedom truly means, it seems like these days. It`s horrible.
    1
  49. Here in Norway, we've truly been working HARD AF for even longer than America even had the virus. You people have been so childish throughout this whole thing. You don't bother following recommendations because "fReEdOm!!!", while the rest of us didn't make this political at all, because _IT_IS_NOT_POLITICAL_. Now you have an overflow of vaccines which you don't even want, while the rest of the world that actually worked to get this under control are all BEGGING to get a vaccine. America's selfishness is mind boggling. America is a disease worse than covid itself. Smh, fcking idiots.
    1
  50. .. Mentally ill people have a higher chance of being victims, not criminals. Not saying that it is impossible for mentally ill people to commit whatever sorts of crime, but time and time again shows that mentally "sane" people usually are criminals but it's just too easy to look the other way and blame everything wrong and all violence on mentally ill people. Thinking that someone has to be "crazy" to be extremely violent is just ignorant.
    1