Comments by "Rimrock300" (@Rimrock300) on "The Telegraph" channel.

  1. India has a right to defend herself
    7
  2. Really? He just looks engaged I would say
    6
  3. I guess the ukrainian millitary is too busy focusing at the frontline, not wanting to spend time and money for such symbolic small drone attacks on Moscow. Can potensially be sent from within Russia by partisans, with support by Ukraine, if too long doing it from Ukraine. To such groups this can have great symbolic value. Can also been staged by the russians. Who did what, maybe not so important, but shows stuff are going on and tentions going up
    5
  4. A special 'not shoot our own drones down before Moscow' operation
    4
  5. Nobody asked civilians to be present at the bridge at the middle of night during a attack. But, civilians are sadly everywhere, and lives will be lost. the same night the ruzzians kept sending their missiles towards ukrainian cities, as ausal
    4
  6. VERY easy to say to someone who do not live at the place and depends on looging to feed his family
    3
  7. It's a positive step, but a long way to go. There is a lot of prestige in this war to Putin and his leadership. Looks like thay have some challenges getting enough 'fresh people' in to replace the tired, wounded, killed, deserted first batch of troops sent into the war. Talk about they concider conscripts 16-18 year, and letting ordinary inmates in russian prisons go if the serve in ukraine
    3
  8. one just can't take a that close aim, choose among several pillars standing side by side, from hundreds of miles away. They try to take the whole width of the bridge(s). False flag operation, yeah it's clear as mud. Can also be russian defence systems, hitting it by accident in order to take out some sea drones or whatever.
    3
  9. India has a right to defend herself
    3
  10. We have not watched the interview....but we have decided that we do not like it :)
    2
  11.  @lmao.3661  'doing resistance towards Great Tsar of Kreml'
    2
  12. 'russia will win the war, because of the president has been interviewed by an american reporter', or something
    2
  13. 'People get the leaders they deserve',regarding politial leaders. Regarding company leaders, it's different naturally. One can chose to work for another company, but it is harder to chose to move away from one's country and culture.
    2
  14. Does not matter. Sadly. The modern world will catch up to such trbe sooner or later anyway, being on video or not
    2
  15. Does not matter who outside the Putin circle belives what or not. What does matter is that Putin belives what he says, and one have to relate to that fact, like it not, if/when trying to work out a solution. It does not help to 'cancel' people like Putin. they will still be there, doing and thinking their stuff.
    2
  16. More like she is just being italian...
    2
  17. Nobody knows. It's just war. Going on every day.
    1
  18. To whom..? He is just doing his job, bringing info to the public. The public need all kinds of info, just not info it likes
    1
  19. Clearly provoke the person interviewed and being kicked out after some minutes, or not getting much out of the rest of the interview? What's the pint of that? Only an amateur journalist would done that in this setting, knowing how difficult and much work it is to get to interview certain people. An experienced journalist will know to push the limits, but not cross it. Thse actions are a typical part of the russian warfare, for hundreds of years. Would not changed anything to bring them up. Putin look at the very big lines of politics, not interested in the topics of actions on the battlefield
    1
  20. In a while that is forgotten amd there is another 'most important interview'.
    1
  21. in addition to all the western propaganda out there. Just pick a choice
    1
  22. Ukraine not a member of NATO was one of the issues ahead of the invation in the beginning. It was just not that simple, NATO outside Ukraine, and everything was cool...Russian control of Donbas and Crimea also had to be a part of the deal, or else no peace. Putin wanted to grab parts of eastern Ukraine that the russians did see as their historical territory before Ukraine possible went to the EU, and later NATO. Several excuses has been used for thaking that land, nasies and so on
    1
  23. He is not talking to Putin
    1
  24. And India?
    1
  25. Tucker is letting the enemy speak. When someone speak, some things can come out that was not fully intended, and/or read something between the lines and can be of value for the other side. If the enemy is silent, it's worse. One can put the enemy behind a curtain...but he will still be there, not gone..
    1
  26. the economic numbers is blown up by the state throwing a lot of money at the arms industry, much of it via new debt
    1
  27. and re-program him to think 'western'. Which would been unpossible.So the only choice to have him as leader is to move to Russia
    1
  28. it's no terror attack taking out invaders supply lines..it's just war.
    1
  29. Hollywood actors?
    1
  30. Possible nowhere near as a big of an moron as someone that got insulted over some random russian, in Russia didn't spoke great english, with a minimal accent. Lol
    1
  31. What's the big deal. Several US presidents, politicans, reporters, have spoken to Putin, in front of a camera. are they all traitors to america
    1
  32. Link?
    1
  33. One can like Putin and Russia or not, but the facts are this is a nuclear power of 140 mill people. One should use every chance to hear what the enemy might have in mind, not try to put them behind a curtain, as the problem stil will be there
    1
  34. Putin is a autocrat and can dictate whats is right and wrong in his country. What he says, will be so. Western countries are democratic and then there are many different people having a word into what is right or wrong', what should happen. This often can seem messy, difficult to come to mutual agreements, thats just the way it is. It can be a fustration to some people. One are alaways free to move to a country like Russia.
    1
  35. India also have the right to defend itself. Do not forget.
    1
  36. Hard to tell. A bit more likely russian partisans, with support of ukraine
    1
  37. He is probably the one that informed the russian leadership that tucker is in Moscow. They had no idea.
    1
  38. It's better to hear something from your enemy, than silence. One can put the enemy behind a curtain...but he will still be there..
    1
  39. There were no terrorism in Russia from Ukraine and the western borders before Russia invaded their neighbour country. No it's a war and whole of Russia is a legal target.
    1
  40. there is nothing special with this evening. The war is constanly ongoing
    1
  41. Yeah. He got a lot of info about the US, and many important friends and connections around the world. Could be useful for our enemies in the fight against the west. Thanks for theadvice.
    1
  42. Cell phone lost.
    1
  43. russia could just stayed at home in the first place, and no attacks in russia. Now they have made their own country a legal target to bomb.
    1
  44. It's war, Russian/Ukraine. Yes, it is in Europe
    1
  45. Is Russia in a war wth the US?
    1
  46. Sea drone. Hitting pillar. Bellow the bridge.
    1
  47. Makes no sense. He is not a US offical. He is a free private individual doing his job
    1
  48. Sadly there have been many civilians killed during US invations around the world too
    1
  49. There are always 2 sides, at least, in politics. People will chose to belive the version of truth they like the best.
    1
  50. while the left desperately screams 'putin is his boss!'
    1