Comments by "Rimrock300" (@Rimrock300) on "Real Crime Spotlight" channel.

  1. he had no measurement of the speed, and possible no video, just eye observation. Maybe not enough to arrest the kid. At least he gave a warning. If the kid has not rashed right after, sooner or later he possible would
    2
  2. She was fully free to step out of the car, both before, while , and after the meeting with the cop. She was as exited as the driver about the speed. Sadly for her.
    2
  3. the cop should had been more strict, but on the other hand he had no measure of the speed, just eye obeservation. Maybe not enough to arrest the driver according to the law. At least he warned them.
    2
  4. In the end it was the kids decision. The cop should been harder, but we do not know the rules of this city.
    1
  5. The cop was too soft on the driver. they where the same age, and both likely hispanics. anyway, the cop will never do that again. In the end it was in the hands of the driver.
    1
  6. That would helped .how?
    1
  7. She is into this too, the kid wanted to impress her, she could 'easily' told the guy to slow down or demanded to let her off if he was to continue the stupid game. Sad to say these where two less bright people, speed freaks, and would had gotten what was coming for them sooner or later. Luckily no innocent people involved
    1
  8. Someone comments that the man and woman looked stoned to a degree. Drugs involved can maybe be a factor into this reckless behavior too @apriltorres3684 
    1
  9. She was also into 'need for speed' and exited for this new car and what it could do
    1
  10. Maybe, maybe not. Different cities and states, different rules.
    1
  11. At least he warned the driver and passenger. He decided not to listen, and the girl decided not to step out
    1
  12. Nope. It was the kids decision
    1
  13. Stoned, some suggest
    1
  14. They where both stupid and at fault for the outcome. Luckily no other was killed.
    1
  15. The cop was young and inexperienced, 24 years as the driver he stated. Some mentioned the kids looked stoned
    1
  16. It was the kids decision. He was stupid and would had it coming sooner or later anyway. Agreed they should not been allowed to go on. The cop was fresh, 24 years, as the driver, and we do not know the rules of this city
    1
  17. In the end it was all in the hands of the driver. The cop was young and unexperienced, stated he was the age of the driver, 24, he should had been much stricter.
    1
  18. File a lawsuit
    1
  19. Well stated. Fully agree
    1
  20. They where both speed freaks, exited to test the new car. The girl could easily stopped the idioti, but was in for it
    1
  21. The girl was into it too, 'need for speed'. She could easily stopped the stupid driving and gotten out if she didn't like it. Darwin at work, and luckily no innocents involved
    1
  22. She also had a 'need for speed'. If she was against the stupid driving, she would had been out
    1
  23. But she was into 'need for speed' too .or else she would had been out of the car
    1
  24. They got a funeral
    1
  25. A young cop, he said he was the age of the driver, 24. One live and learn
    1
  26. Sadly, no
    1
  27. The cop should had been way more strict. He stated later he was the age of the driver, 24. Young guy, one live and learned. In the end it was the driver who was at fault, did not listen. The woman could have stepped out long before the accident, but she seemed to enjoy the speed too
    1
  28. She was into it too, need for Speed. Or else she would been out of the car.
    1
  29. Yes. He had insurance.
    1
  30. She was a speed freak too. Or else she would not been in the car
    1