Comments by "Rimrock300" (@Rimrock300) on "Driving the SCANIA 770S, Most POWERFUL Semi Truck in the WORLD!" video.
-
34
-
Nothing wrong to own antique cars and trucks, enjoy the art of operating them, preserve the history. Your friend is driving a truck to make a living, get goods from A to B. Of course he has to focus at operating current trucks. Sorry, can't stop development, it's all about hauling more goods faster, and at a lower cost, and higher comfort to the drivers, less health issues, less worn out shoulder and so on. If he takes an interest in antique trucks as a hobby, he can learn to operate them well enough if he wish. Of course he is a truck driver! There is nothing stupid about potentially less health issues after years in a truck!
9
-
7
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I know hills, living in Norway, lots of 770S and 750 volvos all around here, and for a good reason. What i see in the US is mainly endless flat lands, gentle hills, and fully understand the 450-550 hp typical trucks, with just 37 t total weight; nothing compared to Europe. But again, sure in the Rockies, many driving there mainly, would love to have more power. and tuning is not unusal, 600-800 hp. I would not mind them having larger standard engines. But all I see is Cummins got max 600 hp or there bout, for trucks, and there nust be a reason why they do not bother developing more powerful engines. The technology is there for sure, and if needed they get help from a Euro manufacturer. @st-ex8506
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Ah, okay, I understand, you first of a all have a enviromental aspect regarding using and maintaining older equipment. Your statement make sense and I fully agree with the enviromental issues regarding the humans seems to be using more and more of the natural resources, making new things all the time to replace things that often canlast longer. I too like to use my things for a long time, I not often by new things. It is the society, the people in general, that pushes this development, to harvest more and more from mother earth. Manufactures like Scania just tries to help fill the ever rising need for transportation, and now lately demand for eletric vehicles. Yes, I agree, and many others, regarding the issues with production of batteries. Even if it at the moment does not look so goode nviromentally, hopefully one can solve and improve issues. It is a big subject. @MaisonShiraz77
2
-
1
-
1
-
Those 6000 usd quickly disapears if needing to change x broken electronic modules a year. Many truckers prefare some older trucks, 'analog trucks', that uses more fuel, but are simpler put togehter, less stuff that can break. The big fleet owners already use modern streamlined trucks, with the latest engine tech. Yes, many of them might are more basic than a Scania, but the big sleeper is more important than electroinc stuff and just flip a switch to change gear. Yes, a Euro truck could be fine for local transport in the US, around town or around state, away 3-4 days at the tme, not 3-4 weeks as many are. Stop with this stupid ideas Euro trucks are 'light years ahead'. The Us would been full of euro trucks a long time ago if that was the case. The big truck owners do not care about chromed piperacks, but profit. The US is the largst economy of the world, if very much depends on efficient transport of goods on the road. @sinisatrlin840
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Time is money, until one tip over a point and it's not. Use a lot of extra fuel, and in the end the driver have to sit and wait for a new load, arriving too early and so on. This has to do with total economics, save a couple of minutes in a long hill vs raised costs with a larger engine for the 98% of easy terrain. Going from 25 mph to 65 mph is fantacy. In reality if 25 mph with 450 hp, might be 35 mph with 700 hp diesel engines. sure, some trucks, drivinga lot in hilly terrain would been better of with some more hp. There is no economic in setting up a truck for going up double speed a few hills, less than 1 % of total distance. anyway, What I want to say, if there was a demand of a certain amount for more powerful engines, cummins and the other suppliers would have no problem coming with their engine at 7-800 hp like in Europe. In general electric trucks will be more efficient than diesel, but there is
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The 'far behind' comments in here is mostly from talking heads, both sides of the pond, that where like this in their childhood; 'my father's car got much more horsepower than your father's car!' Modern engines both sides of the pond, are at the same level. Lot's of international co-operation between engine manufacturers, and similar strict emissions rules both in North America and Europe. What the Us manufacturers might be 'behind at' is they might use cheaper parts around the truck, except the engine, to make more profit. 'Company greed' mtraditionally is higher in the US, with stock owners and Wall street wanting to maximize profit. And european manufacturers design all major parts from the ground to specifically fit their trucks, while US manufacturers are more into assembly trucks with parts from many different suppliers. Also the Euro trucks like these Scania's got more of the feeling of driving an ordinary small car, a sedan, regarding the interior, noiselevel and so on, while the US truks often got a more 'rough feel' to them. Anyway, goods are hauled from point A to B in both the US and Europe, at about similar fuel mpg, even if there are some different preferances regarding the design of trucks
1
-
1
-
1
-
1