Comments by "Rimrock300" (@Rimrock300) on "Tucker Carlson releases interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin" video.

  1. Tucker Carlson wish to get important information out to the people, good or bad. Foregin reporters did interview US presidents during invations of Iraq, Afghanistan, vietnam and a lot of other countries. That did not mean those reporters where all supporters of the actions of the USA.
    2
  2. It is the real journalism to be 'neutral', and allow both sides to speak. But in the US there is little money to the bigger mediaoutlets in not favouring the main political forces of the country. If one go 'neutral', much of the money disapears
    1
  3. Putin is naturally a sharp and intelligent leader. If you where not set for living fully according to the Putin regime's guidelines in Russia, you would much better prefere Biden and US and littery do how you liked)
    1
  4. Putin is what he is no matter what, being interview or not. If someone want's to interview him, go ahead, why not.
    1
  5. so what's the problem then with all the fuss among the left? Someone interviews a man nobody cares to listen to. It would just be like he was not interviewd at all, so everything is just as usual. Nothing happened.
    1
  6. Hitler is not relevant. Very few dictators dies like Hitler, and suddeny everything is over, that's the problem. Most dictator stays along for a long time, they have time to find someone following them, and they often represent countries of millions of people, and there is weapons involved. This means one are forced to have a relation to them, live with them as best one can, like them or not, and try follow their steps. They and the problems they represent will not go away if one just put them behind a curtain of silence....This idea of just ignoring them fully, and 'the problem will disapear, 'they will die the same way' is pretty naive.
    1
  7. 'The world' also consist of others than 'the west'. The west have done their best to isolate him, while others have a relation with Russia, largely because of economical factors. 'Time' is the only realistic soultion to the Putin issue. No one lives forever. Many dreams about a sudden collapse of the russian economy in near future, but not very realistic. Regarding the war, realistically the best one can hope for, in the short to medium long term, as long as Putin is around, is the conflict gets frozen at about the frontline that have been present for the last year+. Say the west sends x5 more weapons, and the russians get pushed largely out. They will just take a break, and come back again and agian, as long as they got enough money and people to send, which do not seem to be near empty yet. Is it worth it to the western population and economies? This said, I would gladly see Putin gone, but one have to be realistic, not live in a dreamworld. This was possible not the solution to the answer, you got another point of view, and I am automatically 'a liar'. That's fine. Cheers  @Theyrewrong827 
    1
  8. Trump agrees with Putin that Ukraine is not a real country, but a natural part of russia? Can you supply a link? Or think about the fact that Trump want to have an end to the war asap, stop the killing? Only Russia will have an advantage if killing is stopped, while Ukraine will not? One can daydream all one wish, but the conflict will end in a line about where the frontline is today. Maybe some less aggressive russian leadership in some decades will give some theritory back in a try to come to a peace settlement
    1
  9. It's the money that rules MSM. They want to please according to the main political forces of the US. If not, they would been some media outlest of minor importance and size
    1
  10. Less than he can afford to lose. So far. It seems.
    1
  11. Most of them are just stating what they see, not wrong to say he is a strong leader, sticking top the top of the russian pyramide of power for over 20 years. That do not have to mean they love him, want to live in his country under his rule
    1
  12. So, then it might be better to NOT cross the limit, and at least get SOME info out of Putin. One can natually question certain actions, but it will change nothing.  @jankowalyk7301 
    1
  13. What differnce would that do? 'Oh, I must stop killing my oponents since some foregin reporter asked about it!'
    1
  14. they would likely not been given access to Putin anyway
    1
  15. Halleljua! We're moving to Russia, being under the rule of a real leader!
    1
  16. there is much into that. even if/when they wished to interview him, then would not get access
    1
  17. There are different versions of 'the truth' regarding high end political issues, all depending of what side on are. Putin present his version of the truth, that the majority of russians live in. 'We are living in the real reality, while 140 million russians are living in a fake reality'.
    1
  18. Yes. But MSM would not get access to Putin. They are regarded as very one-sided
    1
  19. ok
    1
  20. Yeah. an 'evil genious'
    1
  21. Of course. Which makes things more challening to the other side.
    1
  22. that's 'easy' to say, sitting far away from the russian reality of everyday life
    1
  23. Has he been offered one? Link?
    1
  24. that's the right spirit for being a perfect part of the russian society!
    1
  25. There is, but realistically regarding the MSM in the Us, they have 'no choice' than following the view points of the main political forces in the US if they want to be a news outlet of any size. If they started to be 'neutral', they would just be some minor players
    1
  26. they just want to follow the general guidelines about what they are allowed to like or not
    1
  27. so you're moving with your family, to be a part of the russian society, under Putin's rule. Nothing wrong with that, just as long one evaluated that one got today, and what one will get
    1
  28. Anyone who do not present us the info and points of views we the most wish to hear, are liars naturally
    1