Comments by "nameless" (@nameless-yd6ko) on "Rationality Rules" channel.

@theguy00000 The only sarcasm was the 6 years old crack, which was inappropriate and, for which, I apologize. ;)
2
Nonsense. Causality is impossible scientifically and philosophically.
1
@theguy00000 Yes, and none of it ever actually happened. Do you know the meaning of 'metaphor'? Are you 6 years old?
1
Debunk this; All the common pro-God arguments presented fail terribly when examined in critical thought, they are filled with logical fallacies. What these arguments will do is to provide food for a growing belief. A belief infection is very un-particular regarding it's dietary habits, whereas philosophical critical thought is very particular and doesn't allow the fallacies and errors that belief infections feast upon! ;) It is much simpler to offer and sustain the argument/theory that everything exists! Wanna know how easy that would be? To exist is to be perceived. To be perceived means to exist. Now, unless one can sustain a valid argument against what seems to me a Universal definition (Occam at his finest ;), it is no longer a reasonable statement (question) that (fill in the blank) does or doesn't exist. ;) Perceiving in your mind as concepts is the same place and way that anything is perceived. Did I just show that God exists?
1
'Creation' is scientifically and philosophically impossible! No 'creation' = none of these sort of questions! ;) Perhaps rephrasing; "Why are we here?" might find you a more desired response? ;)
1