Comments by "Ayodeji Olowokere" (@ayodejiolowokere1076) on "Dan Davis History" channel.

Mesopotamia was.
2
@AS-hz8cv so when the most commonly spoken language was Aramaean? What about then? These things change, it's the initiation that made the indelible impact.
1
@AS-hz8cv in relativity to civilization it really isn't. Once the majority of civilization was Middle East bound. And where half the world's population was Achaemenid, Aramaean dominated in a way no modern European language has. These things change. What doesn't change is who got the ball rolling.
1
@AS-hz8cv incorrect, hunting and gathering is not universally passed down innovation. And you've shifted the goalposts, you were talking about native English speakers and colonial empires not the broad world of Indo European languages. Secondly, we're talking about their impact on civilization, not a random language.
1
@AS-hz8cv My entire argument has been based on civilization not language. My argument is founded on the basis of civilization being much more significant to the human odyssey than language. Most of Africa speaks a Niger Congo language, most of North Africa and the Middle East speak an Afro Asiatic language, most of the Far East speak a Sino Tibetan language. Who cares? Language is just a tool people communicate with, who cares about language as far as assessing impact? People will always speak something, what matters is technological knowledge and to that end no culture has done more than the Mesopotamians.
1
@UCSnBC-S4NdBs-IY5IiTS--g you're saying because of how widespread Indo European languages are, the foundation culture for proto Indo European had the single greatest impact on mankind.
1
@AS-hz8cv if you want to get rude kid, I'd suggest you just leave.
1
@AS-hz8cv hahahaha. Okay.
1
@treninjector2245 immature clown. Indo Europeans aren't even a single group. And the alphabet and foundations of technology come from the Fertile Crescent.
1