Comments by "Stevie" (@matthewhorizon6050) on "Who Really Killed Kennedy? - Joe Rogan and Michael Shermer" video.

  1. Yeah, he's ultra annoying in that way.
    5
  2. "JFK: The Smoking Gun" is the most compelling and partial explination of Kennedy's assassination. It doesn't make any conclusive claims or suggestions regarding motive(s) -- it simply lays out evidence and arrives at a reasonable conclusion. It also examines the shot and the degree of difficulty in hitting the mark in that sort of layout. Spoiler alert, it does show through a simulation w credentialed marksman that it could be made. But it also demonstrates that the exit and entry wounds were from two different calaber and types of projectiles. If you haven't seen it, check it out. It's about as rational as it's gets.
    3
  3. @Chris S, Watch the relitivly new doc on the JFK assassination. It's fucking SPOT ON. It's rational and not steeped in conspiracy; plus, it demonstrates the way our gov rolls. Check it out, it was investigated by a retired cop from the UK or maybe Australia.
    1
  4. Bnik, I'm telling you! Watch the new doc on this. It has the largest body of investigators: forensics and ballistics experts, along w a crime scene simulation with highly skill marksman shooting at a moving target (same size, dimension, angle and speed).
    1
  5.  @yaboi1194  It's not that easy of a shot. They ran simulations w all the variables involved in that scenario and many of them struggled. None of them successfully hit the target on the first shot.
    1
  6.  @gideonMorrison  k, let me find it.
    1
  7.  @gideonMorrison  It's called, "JFK: The Smoking Gun." This is just a trailer but I'm sure you can access is w ease, as it is a "made for TV" movie/doc. It explains a lot about the error in how the investigation was conducted and the why there were simple ballistics errors made. I'm not a naive guy, which is a position most people probably hold, but I'm just saying this doc appears to say a lot about glaring problems about evidence that was never addressed. https://youtu.be/DNEmqi7zhU0
    1
  8. https://youtu.be/DNEmqi7zhU0
    1
  9.  @causerDAguv  WTF are you talking about? First of all, I'm not some conspiratorial junkie and never once stated that those shots were possible or not. I simply suggested that in a recreation simulation, it took a well regarded marksman 3 times to hit the target. That's not a lie, it's simply a fact that's open to public domain. Plus, the expert marksman didn't have any pressure on him either. Overall, I'm not pretending to have any concrete answers. I'm a social researcher and VERY methodical about how I collect data and the evidence I'm privy to. I don't make wild notions, assumptions or accusations. I think Oswald could have shot JFK or not shot him. How the hell could I possibly know for sure w all the extensive lying our government has engaged in throughout the years. If anything, it say it's rather naive to think otherwise. That said, as I already stated, I'm not a conspiracy theory nut, who is obstinate towards embracing fundamental truths. But look at what Snowden revealed: rather shady shit. I don't put it past anyone to lie, especially people who are shrouded in deception regularly. We're given information on a need-to-know basis. Genuine transparency is not a consistent luxury granted to the people under a government of any system, and those who think otherwise are foolish.
    1
  10. A relitivly new documentary unveils quite a few truths. Oswald might have gotten off a great shot -- this is absolutely true. They set up an identical scene and duplicated the angles and distances, along w a same sized target movingin in the same exact direction and speed. A couple pro rifleman pulled it off, but it was no easy task. But two shots, being a bolt action (I'm almost positive it was a bolt action) is nearly impossible. Its HIGHLY unliky that any human being could have hit that target twice, especially w the mechanics involved between rds. However, one shot is very plausible, which is probably what occurred. But a second bullet hit him and from a different angle, in which the entrance wound was gaping, and the projective was different. What they believe happened is the following: (1) Oswald got of a spectacular shot (one and one only, never attempted a 2nd). (2) He was accidentally shot by a CIA agent in the car behind him. The entire group of agents were blind drunk the previous night. The guy that sat in for a more intoxicated agent was a rookie and when he heard the first shot he accidentally let off a round. It went right through JFKs nogin. The standard round issued for those guns would have made that exact same wound, especially due to their close proximity. The CIA has been notorious for this drunk shit (e.g., I forgot what the situation was but they had a rather huge fuck-up under the Obama administration too) and they did not want to take partial blame for the president's death. Can you imagine the heat they'd get for that? The only conspiratorial aspect of this theory is that an agent took the bullet from the scene at the hospital, so they couldn't link it to the CIA. The doctor now admits that this happened. THE DOC'S LIFE WAS THREATENED AND HIS FAMILY'S Plus, numbers of witnesses near the street claimed that they heard and saw a flash coming from the vehicle. These road witnesses always knew that a bullet came from the other vehicle but their story never grew legs for obvious reasons (around 17 folks made this claim BACK THEN and they still support their original statement). The investigator was not an American. He was from the UK or Australia. I could be wrong about his nationality, but he's defiantly not a US citizen. Check it out, I'm 99% sold on this version. Never has there been so much forensics work, simulator exersices and witness testimony. I'd bet dollars to donuts, THIS is how it went down.
    1
  11. It's amazing, this huge comment section and not a person watched the documentary just released a few yrs ago. Investigated by a non-American, retired detective from the UK or maybe it was Australian. Do t make your find up until seeing it. It's the most thorough investigation BY FAR.
    1
  12. Watch the relitivly new doc on the JFK assassination. It's fucking SPOT ON. It's rational and not steeped in conspiracy; plus, it demonstrates the way our gov rolls. Check it out, it was investigated by a retired cop from the UK or maybe Australia. And yeah, they believe Oswald got off an amazing rd, but there was another round that hit Kennedy's which made the same entrance would as a standard issue CIA issue given by the CIA.
    1
  13. This is what happened. You may laugh, as it is "that guy" narrating the doc, but you will find the content convincing. https://youtu.be/DNEmqi7zhU0
    1
  14. Watch the relitivly new doc on the JFK assassination. It's fucking SPOT ON. It's rational and not steeped in conspiracy; plus, it demonstrates the way our gov rolls. Check it out, it was investigated by a retired cop from the UK or maybe Australia.
    1
  15. Michael Shurmer has that, "punch me in the face" demeanor. He's as sanctimonious as it gets.
    1