Comments by "Stevie" (@matthewhorizon6050) on "Joe Rogan u0026 Killer Mike on Mike Tyson's Legacy" video.
-
15
-
8
-
5
-
I could be wrong, but I've never seen a study that shows weed to be "good" for your brain. Yes, it does help alleviate the symptoms of some mental disorders; can be beneficial in palliative care; and used as an antiemetic, especially w cancer patients who under radiation and/or chemo.
I smoked at the age of 14-28 and loved it -- seemed to foster a creative side, in terms of playing guitar. But w memory recall? Hell no haha! And certain forms of memory recall affect our intellegents: that's a fact -- no longer debated. However, I guess it can have positive effects on other types of intelligence, such as musical, kinesthetic, visual, etc. When I smoke now, which is rare (it's been a few yrs now) it makes me at least 3/4 retarded.
😐+🌿=😵
Unless you need it to help remedy an ailment or symptom of some type, it's just a party drug. And I mean it's psychoactive properties, not CBD products.
1
-
@J.C.117
Because he was past his prime. That's why. "If you were a boxing fan you would know" that. ANY FIGHTER who relied on speed, especially at HW is not going to be the same after such a long layoff. The best version of Ali was was never seen, due to the Vietnam fiasco. When he returned, he lost step and by '76 he was a totally different fighter. He was slower, which is not an overly perceptive insight if you ask me.
Of course his footwork was amazing. I'm not trying to act like a bitch, but pointing out that Ali had unparalleled footwork is no "inner secret" among boxing aficionados. I've been watching boxing since the 70s -- understanding what made Ali great is rather obvious: he didn't move like a heavyweight and had a granite chin, period.
So yes, he relied heavily on footwork. Later in his career he relied heavily on slipping punches, not controlling distance and threw A LOT of jabs; no longee was his footwork as effective -- he lost a step.
Think about it, Ali faught 13 times before the 2nd rematch w Frazier. He was already entirely different after that fight. Guys faught SO OFTEN back then. He had way too much mileage by '67, especially considering that he relied so much on speed in his best yrs.
1
-
@J.C.117
Because he was past his prime. That's why. "If you were a boxing fan you would know" that. ANY FIGHTER who relied on speed, especially at HW is not going to be the same after such a long layoff. The best version of Ali was was never seen, due to the Vietnam fiasco. When he returned, he lost a step and by '76 he was a total different fighter. He was slower, which is not an overly perceptive insight if you ask me.
Of course his footwork was amazing. I'm not trying to act like a bitch, but pointing out that Ali had unparalleled footwork is no "inner secret" among boxing aficionados. I've been watching boxing since the 70s -- understanding what made Ali great is rather obvious: he didn't move like a heavyweight and had a granite chin, period.
So yes, he relied heavily on footwork. Later in his career his approach was geared more around slipping punches, not controlling distance and threw A LOT of jabs; no longer was his footwork as effective -- he lost a step.
Think about it, Ali had 13 times before the 2nd rematch w Frazier. He was already entirely different by the 2nd fight. At one point, Ali faught 15 times in 2 yrs. You don't see that anymore. He had way too much mileage by '67. We never should have seen his last 10 fights.
1