Comments by "princeoftidds" (@MachiavellisThePrince) on "Sussmann tried to push this bizarre theory to the FBI: Turley" video.

  1. The countdown is on for Sussman's acquittal and clowns like Durham to shrink back into the shadows.
    10
  2. Wasting taxpayer money is the legacy of Trump's only term in office.
    2
  3. Josef Stalin and Donald Trump both said that.
    2
  4. God, you're pathetic. Is there any scenario where you just accept a loss like a man or are you always the victim of a conspiracy?!?
    2
  5. If Bruce Schroeder, an actual corrupt judge, wasn't consequenced, there's no way a judge following the letter of the law will.
    2
  6. There's only some of the jurors?
    1
  7. You think judge could be as corrupt as Bruce Schroeder??
    1
  8. We were all asking that about the Kenosha murderer. Seems like we learned our lesson and are shutting down Durham's sham investigation.
    1
  9.  H Toc  who is Princess Clinesmith?
    1
  10. More likely a clear lack of evidence and nothing to fit the Trump victimhood narrative.
    1
  11. You presumed he was guilty because you had the wool pulled over your eyes by far-right loons. Come back to reality.
    1
  12.  @mulvey0731  Durham's sham investigation is the result of the political vendetta of the most corrupt President in American history. There's no excuse for being ignorant of that in 2022.
    1
  13.  @rfbedell347  well, me and facts, evidence and common sense.
    1
  14.  @rfbedell347  well, me and facts, evidence and common sense.
    1
  15.  @2ndMostEndangeredGender  good question. No one is entitled to weaponize a law enforcement agency in support of a political agenda. The links between Russians and the Trump campaign are established facts. Sussman doing opposition research is not illegal; if it were the DC jails would be overflowing. Clinton is not a good or moral figure but she knows the law and worked within the system. If the law is detestable, we can change it but we cannot claim something we dislike is illegal and prosecute based off our disapproval.
    1
  16.  @2ndMostEndangeredGender  you're right, Durham is more of a political hack than a clown. I was using clown as a pejorative. In terms of the conclusions of Russian interference, you can read the special investigation report, the Senate Intel Committee report or the consensus statements of the intelligence community.
    1
  17.  @2ndMostEndangeredGender  unanimous acquittal. I did tell you what to expect from Durham and his "investigation".
    1
  18.  @2ndMostEndangeredGender  no lawyer is above reproach but the premise of the investigation is the real dirty dealing.
    1