Comments by "Thor" (@rodster811) on "NBC News" channel.

  1. Roughly 2.5 hours to be exact and the reason for the delay is quite understandable.
    39
  2. That is literally not true 😂😂😂
    9
  3. Didn't need your permission but thanks for the notice CDC
    9
  4. So people are still listening to this political mouth piece I see
    9
  5. You can still access it. The letter hasn't been scrubbed from the Internet.
    9
  6. Playing a sport doesn't have anything to do with "rights"
    7
  7. ​ @nomore2226 who gets to decide what someone gets to read whether you think they are dumb or not
    7
  8. He literally posted it himself for all to see. He didn't keep it private 😂
    5
  9. ​ @Luigi-2025 when you put it publicly on the Internet you've lost the right to say it's none of other people's business 😂😂😂
    5
  10. 😂😂😂... Oh you're serious
    4
  11. ​ @skbrockel you're an npc
    4
  12. Except he posted it on the Internet for all to see so it wasn't exactly private
    4
  13. Did they physically harm or threaten anyone? Then they shouldn't be charged. Scorned? Yes but you really want the precedent to be set that people can be charged for talking to each other privately? Violating all that we hold dear in thid country when it comes to free speech.
    4
  14. ​ @rosejames5172  they absolutely do. Can't wait for the lawsuit to come in
    3
  15. Except for the fact that he posted on social media for all to see 😂. So not exactly keeping it private.
    3
  16. You can't expect privacy if you post what you're doing on social media 😂😂
    3
  17. Didn't break a law but nice try
    3
  18. Plenty to be ashamed of
    3
  19. ​ @microscopic.caterpill he posted to the Internet 😂😂. Not exactly someone trying to stay low-key. Plus as a pastor he shouldn't have been doing in the first place
    3
  20. The only person responsible is the pastor
    3
  21. You mean the stuff that was posted by him? No one had to leak anything
    3
  22. ​ @bobombnik1817 except it does
    3
  23. Maybe if you wanted to be kept private then don't post on social media. Crazy I know 🤷🏻‍♀️
    3
  24. I just read the letter and it's honestly pretty mild all things considered. Honestly nothing that has been said before by Americans themselves
    3
  25.  @michaelp2952  just because some can't doesn't mean it should be banned
    3
  26.  @rosejames5172  Nothing they did was illegal and is protected by law so if we're going to start punishing people this way no one is going to respect the authority and neither of these kids. It's hypocritical to say that you have the right to say what you like but then the government comes in and punishes you for saying what you like. That's not justice
    2
  27. That was the wrong move by the guardian. We're just as bad as the people we label terrorists. We have no moral superiority on anyone
    2
  28. 😂😂😂😂. No it's not
    2
  29. When you put in on the Internet for all to see that's not called outing
    2
  30. How so?
    2
  31. Then it won't just be another men's category
    2
  32. Only according to a Democrat
    2
  33. 😂😂😂... Oh you're serious
    2
  34. Receipts?
    2
  35. So you're on Daniel Penny side because he is the victim here
    2
  36. You watch a 3 minute news video and think he's a great guy 😂.
    2
  37. Why would you make up stuff he never said. You're just like MSM congratulations they aren't gonna hire you though.
    2
  38. Holy crap the bodies aren't even cold yet. People wonder why nobody likes politicians, it's because they can see the load of crap coming from your mouth. I bet none of you know the names of the victims.
    2
  39. ​ @TenaciousToucan  They had permission. Cope and seethe
    2
  40. The letter is publicly available. It's not censored at all actually. It's 4 pages
    2
  41. ​ @rosejames5172 they absolutely do. Can't wait for the lawsuit to come in
    2
  42. Yeah. I'm sure you were doing great work protecting us from the British oh wait, I mean the Germans and Japanese oh wait...... What exactly were you protecting us from oh that's...... Nothing
    2
  43. ​ @denniswood7503 guy in Washington followed orders cops didn't murder him. See how stupid that argument sounds
    2
  44.  @Darktruth376  who gets decided what's considered "misinformation"
    2
  45.  @kamijanae  Having them sit in a cell for having a conversation they had in private is absolutely unjust and should not be at all tolerated. I don't care if you say a thousand to a million hateful things. The government should not punish you for saying those things. Now if they threaten somebody or cause physical harm sitting in a jail cell for a day or two is justified. This is not justified. The only people should be handing out and punishment is their parents if they see fit. I ask do you really want the government to start punishing you for things you say in private whether they are socially acceptable or not.
    2
  46.  @kamijanae  At least you're willing to admit that you're okay with the government punishing you for "wrongthink" or say the "wrong" things. I sure hope people like you wise up to the type of danger that presents to individual liberty. Although from the sound of it (this is just a guess) you don't seem to believe in individual liberty so you might not care. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
    2
  47. You mean he?
    2
  48. Wrong. Try again
    2
  49. Low-key yeah
    1
  50.  @rosejames5172  Punishing them like this for speaking is not at all going to curve their behavior. It's only going to cause them to resent authority because the authority that's supposed to uphold the first amendment didn't do so. You're only going to push them in the opposite direction.
    1