Comments by "" (@MarvinPowell1) on "RE: Sydney Watson - The Men vs Women Problem | Are We Empathizing Too Much With Men?" video.

@snorkus4790 Exactly. Watson is a 5'11" fit, childless career woman in her 30s who's quite wealthy and successful, but expects us to believe she is "traditional" and won't just use a man as a simp or potentially divorce him for money while suing The Blaze over a frivolous MeToo style lawsuit. I'm not even conservative and I'm so sick of women using this grift. Brett Cooper is the worst about it.
3
I know Sydney Watson. I watch some of her content. While I do agree she does probably genuinely feel men are wonderful and need protection, she is a woman, first and foremost, and will look out for herself and her best interests, first and foremost. I've seen her talk about it and contradict herself. She'll say how its "wrong" to disparage short men or not acknowledge male body issues, but then say how she'd never romantically give a man under six feet the time of day (Watson being five-eleven/180 cm, herself.) It's like the logical side of her brain is constantly at war with the feminine side of her brain. Sydney Watson does this a lot, and Brett Cooper of The Daily Wire does it far more; pretending to be "anti-woke" but then still being the girl-boss who wants to have her own career and act like an "Alpha Male," but wants men to pay for her on her dates, be spoiled, and treated traditionally while being an untraditional career woman (and me, myself, don't even desire traditional women, as much as just a female friend and companion.) I'm not even conservative, but this is why I never trust "red-pilled women" like Sydney Watson, Brett Cooper, or the queen of the grift, JustPearlyThings. At the end of the day, these are still successful and wealthy career women contradicting themselves in front of the world.
2
@camo4635 Watson is not a feminist or woke; that is correct. But as a successful childless career woman in her 30s who values money over all else, she is not a right-wing traditional woman either (and I used to be a big fan of hers and I'm not right-wing or political, myself.)
2
@Tential1 Exactly. She's not red pilled, because at the end of the day, she'll still expect a man to pay for her dinner at the end of the night or divorce him and take half his money, in a heartbeat. I agree with the sentiment to not hate women or men, but I don't trust Watson anymore. Especially after that comment she made shitting on short men, just like woke e-thots do.
1
@tigernotwoods914 Brett Cooper is even worse about the grifting than Watson is. Cooper supporting everything about the Barbie movie and even the director unironically (as in, its actual message, not the unintentional one) and dismissing it as "it's just a movie; lighten up!" despite its messaging and despite Cooper's job literally being "to call out woke content," was enough to expose Brett as the huge fraud she is, though there were probably numerous warning signs before. I now get repulsed seeing Brett Cooper on anything. There's plenty of documentaries from non-leftists here on YT exposing just how stupid and contradictory Pearl Davis is. Like her constantly saying "women shouldn't have rights" as a way to troll, but then saying she should be president. Pearl can't even be consistent in her lies. I never watched any of her content and watched the expose videos on Pearl without prejudice or bias; Pearl is the biggest grifter of all once you see the bigger picture.
1
@UnfilteredContent I used to be a fan of Sydney Watson for a long time. The problem with "red pilled" women like her is that the red pill completely contradicts everything they want as feminine hetero women, i.e., men buying them things, men being subservient to them, and men being their "husbands," aka slaves. As MHD points out, women cannot escape female nature. These "red pilled" women like Sydney Watson, Brett Cooper, Candace Owens, Pearl Davis, etc., can all pretend to understand men's issues and suffering, but at the end of the day, still want men to pay for her dinner and simp to her, because that's what we're told "masculine men are supposed to do" and feelings trumps logic and "sticking up for men's rights" every time. You don't have to be a "woman hater" like Watson implies to recognize women want "a provider" and that modern educated career women - especially those in the West - are less inclined to care for you or their well-being since they no longer need to rely on you for their lifestyles, even if they still want those traditional gender roles anyway. In other words, these women are full of double standards. I'd at least be more likely to trust a "red pilled" woman if she was a lesbian and knew how predatory some women can be.
1