Comments by "" (@MarvinPowell1) on "Misha Petrov"
channel.
-
247
-
You act as if birth defects, deformities, skin conditions like vitaligo, or amputees, are any more attractive than obese women. It's all unattractive to the majority of straight men and trying to force, compel, or shame men into "what's considered attractive" is a bad move, no matter what.
...Even though that's why skinny women are seen as attractive in the modern day and Rubenesque women were seen as attractive hundreds of years ago, because "health" may be a factor in physical attraction, but you can rarely tell one's health by their looks; it has more to do with socioeconomic status and class more than anything. Fatness used to be a sign of wealth hundreds of years ago; nowadays being fit and skinny is a sign of wealth, while being overweight is a sign of being working class/poor.
So really, the whole "being thin is a sign of good health, that's why it's sexy" take is complete bullshit too, the "Body Positivity movement did the same thing, in the inverse, saying "being 300+ pounds as a 5'3 woman is a sign of health cause it means you're not anorexic." Both sides are wrong, and beauty standards are determined by the socionomic health standards at the time.
Which is why it's usually ONLY upper middle class and wealthy men attracted to skinny women. Working class, black, and Hispanic men are attracted to thicker women for the same 'health/class' reasons.
TL;DR: How wealthy you grew up and where you lived, determines physical attraction, not the fashion industry or any body positivity movements. Sorry for writing a whole book here.
9
-
5
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1