Comments by "John Roberts" (@view1st) on "CRUX" channel.

  1. There was a second resolution tabled by Brazil, virtually identical to the Russian resolution, that the USA has also vetoed, showing that the USA does not want peace.
    23
  2. Because the USA's global intelligence‐security apparatus controls most of the world's media, even extending to countries that are generally thought of as being independentl like China and Russia, countries that play along to get along.
    11
  3. And an economic alliance (implicitly military) with China and Russia should be signed to help them properly develop their economies independently of western institutions.
    7
  4.  @luishernandezblonde  I would say it's economic and political mainly, with the USA playing a major part – allowing or instigating, enabling.
    5
  5. India has stuck to a commendable policy of neutrality since independence and so far it is has served it well, so until proven otherwise it is a policy that I think India should continue with.
    5
  6. This base will allow the Chinese to work more closely with the Russians, cementing their alliance and gaining valuable experience while doing so.
    5
  7.  @M.R.C.R.  Crypto and digital currencies, non‐SWIFT payment systems, non‐fiat currencies backed by gold, silver and other commodities in high demand, together with highly advanced transport and telecommunications infrastructure (eg. internet, high speed rail) and with strong economies backed by plenty of indigenous resources, large pools of skilled and educated labour and firmly centred around industrial manufacturing rather than providing services or cash crops, (i.e. diversified economies) will soon completely neutralise any advantages that North America and Western Europe have.
    4
  8. Their dislike is often exaggerated. They have more in common than propaganda would have you believe. Most of the animosity comes from western‐backed regimes; remove them and things begin to look a lot better.
    4
  9. 0:39 Or incendiaries legal under the laws of war?
    3
  10.  @march3254  Poland will no doubt like such a proposition.
    2
  11. Probably by mutual agreement. The elites protecting their arses at everyone else's expense. Typical behaviour for such people. The joke would be in us.
    2
  12. What rich and powerful man hasn't! It goes with the job, just ask an Italian.
    2
  13.  @veritasliberabitvos454  This will have been the fourth time for Britain I think.
    2
  14. Seeing is believing. The world will believe it when it sees it. Not until.
    2
  15. You've been watching too much Star Trek.
    2
  16. They'll help it by brokering a peace deal that leaves the island of Taiwan firmly under the control of the PRC and Asia at peace with itself, free of outside interference.
    2
  17. It's as if they don't they know that they are not the only ones who speak Russian and that others can call them out for their misinterpretation.
    2
  18.  @vladsnape6408  God the good, the mighty, the merciful! 😒😆🤔
    1
  19. One can only hope. It would be their just desserts for inflicting such death and destruction on the rest of us.
    1
  20.  @ljt3084  And all thanks to the US stooge, prime minister Margaret Thatcher who began the process of closing down all our coal mines just so she could destroy trades/labour unionism in the country. No doubt if it was done now instead of back then they would use the green agenda (anthropogenic climate change) as the cover for shutting down a strategically vital industry, as they are currently doing in Germany under the pretext of creating 'green' energy by getting rid of power plants that use fossil fuels. I often wonder if there was/is a more sinister agenda behind making European countries vulnerable to energy blackmail by creating artificial scarcity.
    1
  21.  @maureenstevens6824  And the oligarchs would never have existed if it wasn't for the USA putting them there.
    1
  22.  @khiem1939  more effective? Especially if combined with static (non‐jumping) and jumping mines.
    1
  23.  signalreturn563  The United States created Al Qaeda with the help of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, not Afghanistan, so to say the Afghans will not continue to support something that wasn't there's to support in the first place is ahistorical and goes against reality.
    1
  24.  @ddobry21  If the government of the United States can take an American woman's right to abortion off her, they can certainly take an American man's right to own a gun of him.
    1
  25.  @jamesstreet228  It was a war... against the Afghan people. Moreover, it was a war against an idea; the idea that other peoples should have the same rights as westerners and that poor people should have an equal standard of living as the rich.
    1
  26.  @paulao7022  sounds like science fiction to me. But if they have it I'm sure they've also developed countermeasures that can fool observers too.
    1
  27. Like the German media in the 1939-1945 war, don't expect truth from Crux.
    1
  28. The Turks are probably being put up to this by certain countries that don't want Sweden and Finland to join NATO but can't say it out loud so they use Erdoğan as their errand boy and fall guy who'll take the rap for this. The Finns and Swedes may even be secretly relieved that someone is stopping them committing geostrategic suicide.
    1
  29. Because it's probably one of the several thousands of such groups funded by the military‐security apparatus outgrew USA.
    1
  30.    the Holodamor is German propaganda belonging to the National Socialist period being regurgitated by the United States. It's been debunked. Of course, if you are a supporter of the neo-National Socialist government in Kiev, the one that's collaborating Stepan Bandeira-like with the crypto-fascist USA, then I suppose you are inclined to believe it. However, research will refute the idea that the Holodamor was something done deliberately by the Russians with the intention of exterminating ethnic Ukrainians living in Ukraine.
    1
  31. All this is just a distraction for what's happening behind the scenes. Late stage capitalism is transitioning into global corporatism.
    1
  32. But there was a second resolution tabled by Brazil that did condemn HAMAS (though being in every other respect identical to the one tabled previously by the Russians) that also called for a peaceful resolution to the war between Palestine and Israel and it too was rejected by the USA. Face it, the USA doesn't want peace.
    1
  33. When either Russia or China defend their interests or territory they are described as being aggressive or provocative or some such. When it's the US empire or one of its constituent parts that acts in the same way — often, unlike China and Russia, for no really legitimate reason — it's described as self‐defence and in the best interests of world peace (spreading democracy and human rights, defending women from misogyny and patriarchy, protecting children from abuse, etc. ).
    1
  34.  @brettdemauna9332  If it's true, or it just might be NATO that did it and not Ukraine.
    1
  35.  @brettdemauna9332  From the very beginning. United States interference goes back as far as 1946 in fact when US‐directed terrorists (those who had fought on the German side) continued operations inside Ukraine up until the 1950's. I don't know which news sources you use but mine are telling me:- 1. Mercenaries from NATO countries are operating in Ukraine, some of whom have been captured. — 2. Regular soldiers of NATO countries (special forces to be exact) are operating in Ukraine, some of whom have be been captured or are surrounded in Mariupol. — 3. NATO countries are providing weapons, training, logistical and intelligence support to Ukraine. — 4. The Ukrainian government is not in charge of the country, the USA is. Its pathetic president, Zilensky, is merely a puppet, a Quisling, of the US government.
    1
  36. If the USA even then was planning to take over Ukraine then it makes perfect sense to disarm them of nuclear weapons beforehand. A Ukraine with nuclear weapons is a much a potential deterrent of regime change at the hands of the USA as it is to regime change at the hands of Russia. Just look at Iraq and Libya – they were dissuaded from pursuing their nuclear ambitions and were destroyed because they had nothing with which to deter the USA. Iran faces the same pressure to not build a nuclear bomb less it diminish the USA's hegemony in that oil and gas rich part of west Asia.
    1
  37. Women have no place in war!
    1
  38.  @pugilist102  But the communist party of China ARE the government. So what you're saying is that the Chinese government, a government that represents the people of China, concentrates all the wealth and operates state monopolies. But a government having power and exercising it for the good of the many is what governments do. What do to expect? Or would you rather it be billionaire capitalists concentrating all the wealth in private hands and having private monopolies?
    1
  39.  @saltyshackles5227  What's the difference in performance or firepower between a smoothbore and a rifled tank gun? And aren't low velocity tank guns inferior at armour penetration compared to high velocity?
    1
  40. Completely irrelevant! Poisoning the world's oceans is not okay just because those protesting aren't saints. Poison is poison.
    1
  41. United States' Fusion Centres. Aren't they for survivers/refugees?
    1
  42. Toivon, että maanne pysyy neutraalina eikä provosoi Venäjää liittymällä Natoon, kuten Ukraina teki.
    1
  43. What you say is self-contradictory. If China, along with Russia, has a near monopoly on so‐called rare earths then, yes, the world does need China. And even with your own rare earths that wouldn't diminish the need but merely increase the supply.
    1
  44.  fuckyoutubepolicy staff  Non‐nuclear? What about nuclear? If a country has a right to defend itself then surely that includes possessing the same kind of weapons its adversaries have, at a minimum. Why qualify?
    1
  45.  @Yourebeautyfull  Eastern Europe did. Gave it away to the eurocrats in Brussels.
    1
  46. Perhaps the IMF is better. You get a Structural Adjustment Programme that impoverishes your people and destroys local industries... and you also have to pay back the loan (and take out endless loans to pay back the initial loan). Better still, learn to live without loans.
    1
  47. Another coup may be in the offing first.
    1
  48. I'm sure the enemy knows that though and would have multiple strikes. Also the technology may have been developed that bathes an area for a sustained period in intense radiation that can penetrate even the deepest and most protected bunker. A weapon that can simulate a neutron star burst or something similar for even a couple of seconds is what I'm thinking of. Just out of interest, could dark matter, dark energy, dark flow, exotic matter (whatever they are) be weaponised? Could gravity?
    1
  49. What about hypersonic bunker busters tipped with uranium or some other dense material, especially something designed to act on the same principle as a HEAT (High Explosive Anti‐Tank) round that projects a small but highly concentrated beam of, say, super hot plasma, that can slice through rock like a hot knife through butter?
    1
  50. The IAEA is controlled by the countries of western Europe and North America, with the USA being the main driver. As Japan is the USA's major ally in the region it is going to get supportfrom the USA. China in contrast is but a minor player, relatively speaking.
    1