Comments by "John Roberts" (@view1st) on "The Duran"
channel.
-
166
-
44
-
37
-
36
-
31
-
25
-
23
-
22
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
What makes me afraid is that all the major players — China, Russia, India, Brazil, Argentina, Germany, France, Japan — are all happy to go along with it. There is no pushback. None. There appears to be no communism, fascism, syndicalism, anarchism, or any other kind of viable ideological or philosophical alternative to the status quo like there was back in the 19th and 20th centuries.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, et al now billionaires.
Israel safe.
Middle East destabilised.
Russia's borders threatened.
Opium flowing freely into black projects and propping up insolvent western banks.
Creeping corporate coup d'etat begun in the 1960's, coming out of the closet in the 1980's, consolidating in the 1990's, now almost complete.
Military-corporate-security state virtually in de facto control under Joe Biden. Democracy a sham.
Such quaint notions as human rights, habeas corpus and the like legislated out of existence by things like the PATRIOT act.
FEMA camps, like gulags and concentration laager, at the ready.
Twenty-four seven surveillance.
Lockdowns, curfews.
False flags rehearsed and perfected (Murray Building bombing, Triple Towers, Boston marathon bombing).
Etc., etc., etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If the AfD desire to see Germany conduct a foreign policy independent of the USA, or for Germany to no longer be under the thumb of the USA, then it is inevitable that they will be, by hook or by crook, prevented from exercising any real power, irrespective of whether they are extreme right wing/neo-fascist or not.
• • •
Wenn die AfD wünscht, dass Deutschland eine von den USA unabhängige Außenpolitik betreibt oder dass Deutschland nicht mehr unter der Fuchtel der USA steht, dann ist es unvermeidlich, dass sie auf Biegen und Brechen daran gehindert wird, wirkliche Macht auszuüben , unabhängig davon, ob sie rechtsextrem/neofaschistisch sind oder nicht.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The needs or wants of the United States intelligence community/deep state are behind 'big tech' doing this so the idea that lawsuits and the like are going to have any significant effect in stopping spying or censorship, etc. in the long term are misplaced, in my opinion. Indeed, what's happening with big tech censorship by silicon valley is just one part of a much bigger and more comprehensive breakdown of the things we most typically associate with western democracy, effecting things like freedom of speech, the press, association, etc. and human rights more generally.
I think it really began after 9/11 when a pretext was created by dark forces within the military-industrial-congressional complex but probably planned well in advance. Furthermore - and what's really worrying to me - is that these things will not just be confined to the USA but will be become worldwide, especially among the so-called 5 eyes and NATO, with Russia and China either actively or passively colluding.
The US economy (or at least its currency) is going to crash sooner rather then later (though how far the show can go on is anybody's guess) and a new reserve currency is going to come to the fore with possibly grave consequences in the short term for the political stability of the USA and those countries whose economies are linked to it. It's inevitable, the powers that be know this, and they have contingency planned for it (fusion centres, homeland security, generalised surveillance, the PATRIOT act and similar legislation) in advance of the now very real possibility of an economic crash and subsequent dislocation of the global economy in the manner of the Great Depression of the 1930's.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They are already attacking, it's just secret and behind the scenes using special forces, paramilitaries, terrorists, guerrillas and death squads. The overt presence is there just to deter the Chinese and (especially) the Russians the way that NATO did in Europe and SEATO did in Asia, allowing the USA to wreak havoc everywhere else knowing that there was precious little the Soviet Union could (or was willing) to do. Ultimately, Russia's inaction led its undoing, it being fatally weakened from within because they had adopted a 'siege mentality' from the Cuban missile crisis onwards, being content to hide behind the Iron Curtain, thinking they could win with words and moral suasion what only wars can win. In the end, like the city of Rome and the Great Wall of China, the gates were opened by traitors from within who had grown impatient with the promise of a better life under communism that never came.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Probably put forward on the recommendation of US intelligence as a British equivalent of Barack Obama. We had the first woman prime minister (and most people of the real left know where that led) and now folks it's time for Britain to have a 'person of colour', a POC as they say in woke land, as our prime minister. Like his US counterpart a hopey, changey kinda guy, all appearance and no substance: the ideal candidate to advance the cause of neoliberalism under the cloak of inclusiveness. Attack him and you'll be accused of racism. But, hey, look folks, the City of London isn't racist, it's just allowed to be elected (in elections in which there's no real choice between candidates) the City's first POV so we can keep up with the Jones's across the pond. What next, the first transsexual, the first homosexual, the first non- binary?
[I better shut now before I'm accused of lacking sufficiently in political correctness.]
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How you can imagine liberal/neo‐liberal globalists pursuing a communist path is beyond me. Fascist, right‐wing, rightist, conservative, Republican, Christian Democrat, etc. but left‐wing they aren't.
The fact is Asia and Europe (which is with India but a subcontinent of Asia) are, potentially, drawing closer together to form a single trading block, Eurasia, which if ever realised to any great degree will most likely completely dominate the global economy, eclipsing that of all others combined. And naturally the USA doesn't want that and will do everything in its power to prevent it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't think that it's necessarily a case of these organisations being compromised regarding their apolitical nature, their impartiality, etc. because, at the end of the day it's the United States government that is seizing these internet domain names and websites and not the organisations themselves. These organisations, together with the basic architecture (physical infrastructure) of the internet, it's central core if you will, as I'm given to understand it are located within the territory of the USA itself and therefore fall under its legal jurisdiction. Whether the United States should have done what it has done and acted in the way that it has acted is another debate entirely but ICANN is not realistically in a position to refuse. I dare say that the SWIFT system used for country-to-country financial transactions is also in the exact same position in that neither organisation can stop the United States from taking these unilateral actions. That said, what the United States government has done is, in my opinion, deplorable and has completely undermined confidence in the country as a safe repository of the main transit nodes of the internet/world wide web and as Alexander Mercouris has rightly pointed out will only serve to encourage China and Russia and other countries to set up their own ICANN and create their own internet architecture/infrastructure independently of the USA, though how fast that can be achieved is anyone's guess as neither of the two ostensible adversaries of the USA seem to be in much of a hurry to do anything that really challenges America beyond their immediate interests.
Great show as always, guys. Keep it up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The USA wants Europe to pay for an army to threaten and deter Russia, an imaginary threat, while it uses its own money to threaten and deter China, yet another imaginary threat (imaginary that is if you don't threaten them, otherwise the threat of retaliation becomes very real).
Basically, the USA wants another cold war, albeit one on a shoestring budget due to straitened circumstances. The aim, I presume, is not so much actual readiness for war but grift, pure and simple. The military‐industrial complex of the USA is the core of its economy and, like cancer, it must grow else the whole thing collapses (a bit like Germany in the 1930's, which used pretty much the same military pump-priming to keep its economy growing. And we all know where that ended don't we?)
Like western Europe prior to the Great War (1914-1918) the USA has grown fat off of the grift of its empire and doesn't want either the Russians and Chinese muscling in on the action (à la Germany vis‐à‐vis Britian's empire) or its neo-colonies from gaining genuine independence (à la France vis‐à‐vis Africa).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1