Comments by "John Roberts" (@view1st) on "Alexander Mercouris"
channel.
-
245
-
98
-
58
-
49
-
41
-
41
-
39
-
36
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
27
-
27
-
19
-
18
-
16
-
14
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Britain has no genuine independent nuclear weapons, they are all de facto under the control of the USA and the technology, from the missiles themselves, through to the launch systems (submarines), as well as the navigation systems (satellites) are under the control of the USA, directly or indirectly, as is most of the military and dual‐use technology on which they rely.
I'm also under the impression that France's nuclear weapons have been placed under NATO (i.e. US) control as well, or at least operate within the NATO command structure, though I'm not sure.
To wit, neither Britain or France are in a position to act independently of the USA. And, indeed, why would they? A scenario where either country would feel the necessity of unilaterally using nuclear weapons is all but inconceivable.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
According to British TV and print media all Asians either hate the Chinese, hate the Japanese, or both.
80‐odd years after world war two ended the mass media of Britain are still bringing up Japan's apparent need to atone for what it did in the 1930's and 40's and their equally apparent refusal to do so to the satisfaction of the English speaking world is always alluded to, often with some seemingly obligatory reference to the a rape of Nanking. It's a way, I suppose, of justifying that war by implying how nasty the Japanese were and how they thus deserved to be fire bombed and nuked by the USA, it being done for the benefit of Asians like the Chinese, Koreans and Filipinos and for which the Chinese in particular should be eternally grateful (but to the great chagrin of Uncle Sam and John Bull aren't, or only grudgingly so) and why US troops are still stationed in Japan so long after the war has ended — obviously to protect Asia from itself, which it can't do without a generous helping hand from the white man. To be honest I find it both irksome and subtly racist.
Something similar occurs with Germany, only in their case the portrayal is one of being suitably repentant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
They might be doing this to force governments to be dependent on the USA and the IMF/BIS at a later date or to precipitate a wider, global crisis.
Also, If there is an economic crisis that looks like moderately left wing governments — read radical or hard left to neo‐liberals — are going to win elections like Podemos or Syriza those countries will be over a proverbial barrel with regards energy because they will have depleted their strategic reserves and therefore will be in no place but to obey those who are behind the Great Reset (European Union, IMF, BIS, UN corporations, etc.), just like Greece with the troika.
Another reason might be manipulation of the stock market to steal money for the deep state and its crooks like they did with Enron, Libya, Iraq, 9/11, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Ukrainian government is, it seems to me, basically a puppet government in the fullest sense of the word. The hands of its president are tied by the die‐hards in Kiev (neo‐fascists, US‐trained elements in the army capable of removing him) yet he is, in my honest opinion, in a losing position, militarily speaking, so eventually he, or his replacement, must come to the negotiating table.
As for sanctions, they aren't really designed to work in the way they are described. They are basically a form of warfare permanently waged on a country which, like all warfare, is designed to kill and maim. They are, rightfully in my opinion, criminal under international law and and act of war.
Another thing is the USA might even want the current economic, financial and international system and its institutions to collapse; controlled implosion followed by reconstruction of the (at least western) world's financial architecture under US auspices. In other words a kind of Bretton Woods 2 tying the European Union, Australia and New Zealand willingly our otherwise, to the USA (maybe akin to the continental blockade system that Napoleon Bonaparte tried to use against against Britain during the Napoleonic Wars or the similar system used by the USA during the cold war against the Soviet Union and Pact).
Whether such a thing would work and whether China – which I'm assuming is the biggest economy round about now in real terms rather than the nominal terms reported in the media – would go along with it or has the power to modify it in such a way that it thwarts the USA'S continued dominance I have no idea. The use of the IMF's Special Drawing Rights as a – presumably temporary – form of international currency for this purpose (perhaps in the form of digital currencies which I am given to understand allows for more governmental control over ordinary people) might be used for this purpose, but I'm just speculating wildly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1