Comments by "Immudzen" (@Immudzen) on "268% Higher Failure Rates For Agile" video.

This is why high performing teams under up undermining safe in order to make the actual system more agile.
8
@3borsresistance551 What I find is that agile works fine but SAFE, scrumm, etc. don't. I also find that sprints don't make any actual sense. I do believe in CI/CD, unit testing, mob coding, working meetings where you actually code with the people that need to be involved.
1
@sorcdk2880 Whoa 100+ people on a team. I think we keep ours to about 10 max because otherwise there are just too many interaction points. That would make meetings seriously suck.
1
What I have noticed is that highly functional teams are already pretty agile. However, I see managers try to add agile to non-functional teams and that just fails. I also see many companies use SAFE which is pretty far from agile. It is hard to get anything done with managers twist agile to micromanage. Mostly the way companies use SAFE still looks like waterfall to me.
1