Comments by "chocomalk" (@chocomalk) on "TalkTV" channel.

Especially when only one side has an actual military, it is ridiculous.
10
The reason children in Gaza suffer is because of the Israelis policies.
4
“No other country would be expected to do this! Yes they would, Gaza has no military or infrastructure, Hamas is a small group and mostly untrained, the only reason they are still operative is because the devastation has given them plenty of places to hole up in. And as horrible as Oct 7th was, there was over a year of violence mostly on the part of Israel that preceded it along with the last 70 years.
3
@valeriegrimshaw1365 Still an act of war.
3
@olgakessel4101 Hezbollah is in Lebanon and actually a political party. They also receive bombs from Israel as much as they give. Attacking an embassy is an act of war though.
2
@RoughWalkers Most Gazans don't want Hamas but they can't do anything about it
2
@gordonspicer lmao who took a poll in Gaza when they can't get food or water? Please get a clue.
2
2:35 lol this is BS. For one thing, there is nowhere left to go and another....what is to stop Hamas from going to the East? Nothing and they know it, this is a smokescreen.
1
What accountability? What is the felony here? 34 counts of falsifying business records...all misdemeanours, turned into 1st class felonies by a mysterious crime that has not been brought to the table yet. Accountability needs to be on the side of the DOJ at this point.
1
@onewayup5 lol okay so they hit an Iranian military target most likely part of the same compound, there is no difference. How would the USA respond? lol
1
@onewayup5 There is no difference though, you attack an embassy, military post or any official office of a foreign nation and it's an act of war. Get a clue.
1
There was no peace prior to Oct 7th and the Israelis knew the attack would happen so even if they give up the hostages it would make no difference, this has been a plan for a long time.
1
Did you really say Stormy Daniels is almost Shakespearean? LOL Wow I know you felt you needed to make a point but you seriously lost the plot. And FYI the details were completely irrelevant as was her appearance in court.
1
None of it is relevant, this is a trial about falsifying business records, none of which had anything to do with her except she got paid which is a matter of fact already.
1
@rationalgazer She wasn't coerced.
1
@rationalgazer They spoke up prior to her being in the trial, there was no reason for her testimony so they let the circus bury itself and it probably did.
1
@rationalgazer She was paid and signed an NDA for a business deal in which she received money for sex...her profession. This is a business standard across the board. What part is coercion?
1
@rationalgazer bullshit, she's an adult with considerable experience with contracts, agents and lawyers. What could the possible consequences have been and why didn;t she get a lawyer? Bullshit man.
1
@naaodey7896 They are not experts lol and please look up the discrepancy in "militaries", it's not even a comparison unless shooting ducks in a barrel is your thing.
1
@gordonspicer What the actual hell, get a clue and learn the history before you make yourself look like an ass. Israel is the aggressor here and former occupier of Gaza, not the other way around. They are also the reason Gaza is a prison. All because the people there did not want Israeli settlements being constructed on their land.
1
@gordonspicer It's the opinion of election observers and anyone that has a clue about this situation
1
@020Original Israel blocks supplies all the time and bombs infrastructure and turned if the utilities.
1
Which ones? Technically they both were terrorist groups before becoming defacto governments.
1
Both sides governments started out as terrorists...go figure.
1
@abidjanogly6507 Egypt occupied the Gaza strip before Israel occupied the Gaza strip. Neither wants to help the people, they want the land and resources.
1
What are you talking about? He admits to paying her money. The details of their interaction as well as anything else she has to say are not relevant to this trial, at all. So letting her "testify" for hours in a case that has nothing to do with her directly is an attempt to bring up things outside the scope of the trial.
1
If that was true then for 99.99999999% of it's existence the Earth has been experiencing global warming and we stopped the process by polluting the air. But before that the temp would have risen consistently for about 4.5 billion years making Earth about as hot as the sun at this point.....
1