Youtube comments of lars from mars (@larsfrommars).

  1. Whoah... everyone is the US?
    59
  2. yeah it's a running joke he does
    52
  3. I've seen the statistics on the number of people killed by particulates from a coal plant near where I live- even in the short term, (which is basically all humans think about) it's an extremely deadly habit.
    26
  4. It's not a joke. The Dollar Generals have invaded every street corner and are preparing to launch an attack on our planet.
    24
  5. Nice vid! Have to disagree about Shane's 'jokes', though- I thought they were pretty disgusting.
    21
  6. This is a really weird, geeky quantum physics thing, but it's possible to make maps of infinite spacetime in a finite space- in other words, define a boundary. Not only that, but the boundary can be defined as a separate spacetime from the one it encloses. I'd like to imagine this is the same way, sort of- although time is infinite, you can define some time after that infinity. Plus it's fair to assume that the normal rules of conventional classical physics don't apply in this case. It's a bit weird and pseudoscientific to use quantum physics as a metaphor for religion, but I found it pretty insightful. God I'm such a nerd
    13
  7. Iilluminaughtii has some pretty good videos on them. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXyErkimJt8ztB6CZW8-dL2cNRt1xyCY1
    11
  8. what a good critique of AI technologies i will comment on it to improve its standing in the eyes of an AI
    11
  9. I've seen this problem before and I felt really proud of myself for knowing the answer. Also, someone please get orange winkey in an out-of-context compilation.
    8
  10.  @ishanpednekar6576  No, you knew this tens of thousands of years ago.
    7
  11. adorption Why does my brain do this sh*t to me
    5
  12. aggressive chuckle
    5
  13. He's like that clingy ex-boyfriend.
    5
  14.  @drew8443  You didn't even care enough to put a space, much less explain yourself? Or is it one phrase, as in 'Fakenews'? What does it mean
    4
  15. They're allowed to have an actual political opinion besides yours, as long as they stick to actual facts (unlike a certain orange man in the oval office). Just because they might agree with more leftist ideologies doesn't instantly make it propaganda. They use actual facts and reasoning to back up their opinion, and all they're really saying is that America has a lot more right-wing authoritarian politicians than the rest of the world, (2:08 for the compass) and that it might be good for us to at least consider what's worked elsewhere, more distant from our political compass. And before you scream and whine about me being a socialist somehow and therefore a Nazi, 4:13- 4:53. I know you're probably going to have some absolutely CRUSHING rhetorical response to this, probably something about 'sleepy Joe', but at least consider this for a second first before you inevitably toss it to the wind.
    4
  16.  @ethanstump  Why do we even allow this level of corruption to continue, anyway? We shouldn't be cool with this, like, at all, and yet we remain inert. Why? How?
    4
  17. Human?
    4
  18. Yep, still relevant.
    3
  19. I watched this with a macabre sort of fascination.
    3
  20.  @TrusteeNail ⠀
    3
  21. Yep that's Vox in a nutshell
    3
  22. I'm replying like a dog.
    3
  23.  @exigent7904  Even better, they could have gotten some good dirt on the celebs to blackmail them with.
    3
  24. How 'bout hell?
    3
  25. hoo boy this brought back memories. i'm a lot younger i'm suprised the us has used renaissance for that long. i don't remember it being unbearable personally, mainly because i was a really fast reader. still don't read that much now tho
    3
  26. Read the pinned comment
    3
  27. Some sort of publicly accessible database of raw information (by Youtube) would be really cool to play around with.
    3
  28. ...dammit
    3
  29. Did you watch 4:23?
    3
  30. Because she's not with anyone else.
    2
  31.  @FuzzyFetus  So what? It's still what we experience, and it's what we experience that we want to explain.
    2
  32. I think the tan booth fried his brains.
    2
  33. It was sometime in the 1800s, actually.
    2
  34.  @8bitflea  Why should we? Cheetos hasn't.
    2
  35. Googled for one just a few days ago.
    2
  36. a. nobody asked lmao this is a video about set theory pls stfu b. someone who expresses a consistent and persistent desire to be regarded as a woman in society; if you want to define it w reference to sex, a person who largely wants to be treated as a typical member of the female sex wants to be treated; referred to w female pronouns for example. in most contexts if someone tells me they're a woman i have no reason to disbelieve them c. nobody asked lmao this is a video about set theory pls stfu
    2
  37. 0:00 Kell-oh-oh-oh!?
    2
  38. 32:05 Here's the lawsuit: https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/
    2
  39. I, too, knew this completely and definitely didn't use Google Translate.
    2
  40.  @ethanstump  Yep, yep, and yep.
    2
  41. If the universe is a simulation, our simulators are almost certainly screwing with us.
    2
  42. livestream reading the whole thread
    2
  43. Nothing beats eight hundred eight sexdecillion seventeen quindecillion four hundred twenty-four quattuordecillion seven hundred ninety-four tredecillion five hundred twelve duodecillion eight hundred seventy-five undecillion eight hundred eighty-six decillion four hundred fifty-nine nonillion nine hundred four octillion nine hundred sixty-one septillion seven hundred ten sextillion seven hundred fifty-seven quintillion five quadrillion seven hundred fifty-four trillion three hundred sixty-eight billion.
    2
  44. loving these videos, you're a really great presenter. other people have commented but i'd also like a video on types of reasoning :D
    2
  45. More likely he's a narcissist. This is kind of offending to people like Greta Thunberg, by the way. You've had your internet rant- I hope you feel better now.
    2
  46. There are fricking starving people and America is reduced to this.
    2
  47. Here's the website to DDoS. https://www.ftbagency.com/
    2
  48. I'm sorry you feel that way.
    2
  49. I do. I'm assuming you're referring to Alexandria.
    2
  50. The fact that you can't even use the right form of 'their', much less make an actual argument... 😆 Oh, you're adorable.
    2
  51. Well, because we don't want someone who violated his terms of office, and is also a complete moron, to wind up in office again. That's legal- what Trump did isn't. Republicans seem to not understand that.
    2
  52. English, please?
    2
  53. It is.
    2
  54. As he says in the video, there's a lot of depth and nuance that the political compass can't convey very well. And while Bernie is a lot more left-leaning and libertarian than most of the US, the compass is relative to the entire world.
    2
  55. Whistle. Blowers. Are. Anonymous. It doesn't matter who they are, it matters what they said. There is a government process for whistle blowers, and they can't be faked.
    2
  56. finished watching jesus that was impressive
    2
  57. I think he was talking specifically about life forms that would be recognizable to us.
    2
  58.  @nahtanga  f
    2
  59. About the 'socialism=communism' thing... give 4:13-4:53 a watch real quick. And the reason the US seems so far-right and authoritarian is that it is, at least relative to the rest of the world. We in the states typically don't hear a lot of political opinions from elsewhere, and he addresses this in the video.
    2
  60. Clap and a half! 3👏/2
    1
  61. what if dark matter is actually unpublished physics papers
    1
  62.  @jadeblades  Yep.
    1
  63.  @drew8443  Thank god. I was hoping it was a joke.
    1
  64. Well said, but can you not swear? I suggest editing it to something like 'Jeepers, Trump is a god-forsaken idiot!' (This is a joke BTW)
    1
  65. 2 for 3 not bad
    1
  66. 'garvment'?
    1
  67.  @Mila-Nova  LOL
    1
  68.  Fridden  He was an important military leader in Iraq. Imagine the panic if Cheetos was killed by them- that's essentially what they're feeling.
    1
  69. Oh hey, a fellow quantum boi! So, using that as a metaphor, where positrons are the electron traveling backward in time- what is a human, moving 'backward'?
    1
  70. I joked to my mom once that whenever he hits what I think is the floor of whatever the Republican party can stand, he just keeps going. I said that at this point, he's well past the basement and will find caves soon.
    1
  71. Both parties do, and have done in the past. Trump did it in a way that violated his terms of office.
    1
  72. Nice to see them on Youtube, too.
    1
  73.  @maruk409  Touche.
    1
  74. this is an insane comment we defined mathematical objects the way they are because it was useful we aren't literally duplicating things we're just constructing theoretical structures based on rules we explicate
    1
  75. haha he said later that he messed up the color grading it's the first yt video he's ever made
    1
  76. 2:29 "by a pretty wide margin"
    1
  77. everything about this is fucking brilliant lmao
    1
  78. Touche
    1
  79. The fool doth think himself wise- the wise man knows himself to be a fool. -William Shakespeare
    1
  80. he literally shows in the video how addition works i don't understand lol
    1
  81.  @wesbaumguardner8829  addition doesn't have to mean that the union of 2 and 3 is literally 5 and he discusses exactly the point you make in the video. if you think introducing new and useful math concepts is "sophistry" you're doing something wrong
    1
  82.  @wesbaumguardner8829  you're talking about the union of sets when you say "addition", which is already defined as something different
    1
  83.  @wesbaumguardner8829  the sets aren't completely irrelevant because what we're trying to do is define addition in terms of sets
    1
  84.  @wesbaumguardner8829  i have genuinely no idea what the hell you're talking about. set theory is a major development in modern mathematics and it's cool to be able to build addition and multiplication from a few simple, definable rules applied to these abstract objects with no seeming initial relation. it should follow the same logic as arithmetic always has because that's what arithmetic is, it's not circular at all, it's defining things in new and interesting ways. it doesn't break down because the whole point was to be able to have numbers and justify arithmetic with them based on sets. i don't think you understand the point of math or why it's generally done
    1
  85.  @wesbaumguardner8829  building complex structures from simple and clear initial rules is the whole point of doing pure math
    1
  86.  @wesbaumguardner8829  and this has nothing to do with your initial criticism, which was that somehow he fails to define addition at all
    1
  87.  @wesbaumguardner8829  i literally gave you the equations for unions and addition, as you asked for earlier. they're different things, as i've already explained, and he explained how to do addition in the video with repeated successors. it doesn't work by just putting everything in 2 and 3 together. pure math has nothing to do with your day-to-day or your toes, and clearly you're just incurious about it in general. that's fine, but admit it. set theory isn't redundant because the point of studying sets is to learn more about sets and how they work. look up a wikipedia page, there's so much more to them than is presented here.
    1
  88.  @wesbaumguardner8829  it sounds like you just don't like or care to understand math, because it's all abstraction that we try to learn more about.
    1
  89.  @wesbaumguardner8829  this is such a broad topic that you're speaking with absolute authority on even though you only heard about it an hour ago
    1
  90.  @wesbaumguardner8829  YOU LITERALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT SET THEORY IS OR WHAT IT'S USED FOR. YOU'RE LISTING OFF RANDOM OBJECTS IN A SET AS THOUGH IT PROVES A POINT. IDK ADD THEM TOGETHER IF YOU WANT TO KNOW HOW MANY THINGS TOTAL THERE ARE THIS IS JUST A JUSTIFICATION FOR HOW WE ADD THEM
    1
  91.  @wesbaumguardner8829  you haven't presented any real errors with the definition i can't imagine hating just math in general to the degree that you apparently do. numbers exist because we write them down and think about them and think they're useful constructs and would like to know more about them
    1
  92.  @wesbaumguardner8829  have you professionally studied it at all? i'm sure another roof has and can speak about it with more authority than you. mathematical objects do have real meaning because we decide precisely what rules govern them. numbers will never be "real things" in the way you think that word should be used because that's just not a thing they can be, and not something this video aims to do
    1
  93.  @wesbaumguardner8829  lmao he's probably sleeping or working or touching grass or some shit this is a dumb conversation gnight
    1
  94.  @wesbaumguardner8829  i wrote the fucking equations you're not making any goddamn sense union: {{Ø}, Ø} u {{{Ø}, Ø}, {Ø}, Ø} = {{{Ø}, Ø}, {Ø}, Ø} addition: {{Ø}, Ø} + {{{Ø}, Ø}, {Ø}, Ø} = S(S(S({{Ø}, Ø}) = {{{{{Ø}, Ø}, {Ø}, Ø}, {{Ø}, Ø}, {Ø}, Ø}, {{{Ø}, Ø}, {Ø}, Ø}, {{Ø}, Ø}, {Ø}, Ø}
    1
  95.  @wesbaumguardner8829  i think my comments just aren't showing up for you but i really don't care about this anymore. i'll capitalize 'i' however i please
    1
  96.  @wesbaumguardner8829  lmao "aprobos" in a comment making fun of my grammar is too good. people happen to use language in a way that isn't strictly formal and that's fine. the way we should use words isn't dictated by strunk and white
    1
  97. PJ once made a meaningless comment on a political figure to bolster his party and his feeling of self-worth, rather than meaningfully addressing the issue. mic drop
    1
  98. Name 1 incorrect stat he gave.
    1
  99. I congratulate your success on typing that much. I didn't think you could even put a noun and a verb together.
    1
  100. How 'bout we not immediately call it fake if it disagrees with our opinion, and instead take the time to think rationally about what they're saying? Ohh, wait... you're Republican. That's not how your party works.
    1
  101. I always find the Republican party interesting- you guys demand evidence, then, when it's presented, bang on about the people. The evidence is a moot point by then.
    1
  102. All of us- we are all the same being, after all. Edit- just came up with a bit of an interesting theory, though- maybe the human first to 'live', in that sense, will be the last to die on our linear timeline, and the last to 'live' will be the first human born.
    1
  103. It 'needs to happen' because he is a fool who's done foolish things and surrounded himself with foolish people who, for unknown reasons, like to talk about Kool-Aid. That sort of partisan influence is legal. Forcing Zelensky to get dirt on the Bidens wasn't.
    1
  104. And yes, I'm a Democrat through and through.
    1
  105. I'm guessing you didn't watch it, just Trump's retelling of it?
    1