General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

jsoe81657
Dashcam Lessons
comments

Comments by "jsoe81657" (@jsoe81657) on "Dashcam Lessons" channel.

#4 is as dumb as they can get. Rages at the second car and acts like a victim
453
18.2 and 18.3 are examples of cam drivers lacking brain cells. They could have moved over but want to get footage like they are victims.
225
#10: you are at fault. You drifted into the lane and failed to check your mirrors. Turn your license in
205
Typical Tesla drivers
185
No. 1: you sped up to try to cut the other driver off. Keep crying Karen
163
#3: whichever insurance company that was needs to get investigated and possibly have legal action taken against them. It was obvious the truck did an illegal maneuver and didn't make a U turn as it was in the far right lane
153
@mijrelgeits4751 unfortunately she sped up when the red car was about to merge. She caused a situation and blew it up
130
@azlefty1 from the looks of it the cammer sped up to make the left turn even though the Lexus had already entered the intersection. I would say the cammer is at fault in this case
76
#1 is an idiotic driver who needs to be taken off the road. #4 fails to understand how to yield and wants to play victim.
72
The first one is why people need to learn basic traffic laws before driving. Are they seriously stupid not to know that green doesn't mean turn when they feel like it?
70
16.2 needs to take anger management and learn how to slown down
62
#9 is a mess waiting to happen all the time. People need to learn how to slow down
47
0:42. Why are you tailgating so close? Plus people may back into a parking space. Never assume anything and wait until you can go or have space to move around
35
@truth_hearts_1940 so in your mind, we can run you off the road if you are trying to get on the freeway.
29
@scuffedclips1 did a 5 year old write that?
27
1st video is overreacting. Even if the other party did something wrong don't engage. They were lucky they didn't get shot dead on the road.
22
It's funny how they turned off comments on their video since they probably got called out 🤣
19
@CRB9000 doesn't excuse any of his pathetic stunts. Funny how the original video was removed probably due to people pointing out how stupid the guy was driving. He needs to be banned from driving and fucking take the bus instead
18
@jeffalley4417 this guy is hardcore trying to justify the daughter's actions. He must have never driven a single day in his life
18
The fact that he tried to argue that he was in the right shows how much of a doo doo he is. I'm surprised he hasn't gone extinct for trying to hog the left lane and justifying it.
18
@n_u001 oh f off. Idiots abuse the justice system and are trigger happy to pursue a lawuit. My dad got into an accident and the other party tried to take a property of ours and fake having injuries
18
@aidankeenan5479 look again. The raptor was already getting into the lane when the cammer tried to play cute and cut him off. The cammer needs to get his ass handed to him.
17
Lucky for her someone didn't make her face into sidewalk pancake and knock her teeth out in the process
17
@jessesmusicmanor I doubt that the cam driver will win this case. Most likely they will lose their case since they failed to yield and also decided to submit a fraudulent claim with the insurance.
16
@JZMatrix true. Stupidity has no limits but at the same time I have seen Teslas brake for no reason.
16
@JasonHook9 I would like to point out that it is your responsibility to merge safely and not speed up just to cut in front. What the white car did was reckless and endangering others on the road when there was not enough room in front and he didn't respond appropriately in this situation.
16
2:19 that was on the cammer. You failed to look to see if you can change lanes. Turning on your change signal doesn't give you right of way..
15
#1 is trying to justify his actions. Like wtf you don't do that for a reason. Seriously turn in your license and take the bus
14
@minecraftfox4384 nice try. Red car was already merging and cammer got butthurt.
13
Yeah I'm thinking he didn't check his mirrors to change lanes and probably jumped the gun too soon. Half the time people do this and get shocked pikachu when they are deemed to have half liability
13
@pbear06 yeah have fun with that argument. Unless you can point out there are two lanes it's usually one that makes both left and right turns.
12
@_AndromedaGalaxy_ not in CA. The far right lane in this case was for right turns only and not U turns. The intersection in this case had the far left lane as the designated U turn lane which you can see in the sign. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/handbook/california-driver-handbook/turns/
12
Problem was the dash cam driver decided to speed up and hit a stationary vehicle. At that point he escalated the situation
12
@johnm5928 that makes no sense. A person with a stop sign has to yield at all times and not assume that they can go. A traffic lawyer and insurance even the cops will deem the one who has to yield to be at fault
10
@neilsa9292 Nope. Other driver made an illegal turn and tried to do insurance scam. That makes them 100% responsible and liable for any tickets. Once you do something illegal or cause an accident by being reckless, you are deemed at fault. Not a difficult concept to get
10
 @MazTheWizard yellow means proceed with caution. It does not mean speed up to try to beat the light. So many drivers do it and it's annoying
10
#4 needs to get his eyes checked. The sign allows for two left turn lanes
10
1:48 kind of on the fence with that one. You kind of overstepped the white lane which was there because some people have to make wide right turns and is where you should have stopped before. I honestly think you should have some fault..
10
@sethnelson5621 yeah but the Lexus had already entered the intersection after stopping but the cam driver decided to speed up and not yield.
10
@DeviousDeusExMachina it's stupid in that people coming on sometimes have a short on ramp to the freeway (this is especially true in my area.) If I'm in the far right lane and someone is coming on, I usually slow down since they have to speed up.
10
@beerdedwanderer last thing I saw was the Infiniti making a right turn. Cammer didn't have right of way. Still doesn't excuse the behavior though
10
@dcm1f3 did you see the clip or did you jump the gun? The Lexus had stopped completely before proceeding and even a car had made a left in front of it. You should turn your license in
9
@fuzz6938 in this case it will be the cammer's fault. Reasons being that the cars would indicate there were three lanes and the right lane was turning from what I see. You do not assume that lanes are merging unless there are signs posted.
9
@gsettlemyre the guy hogged the left lane which could have caused an accident or impede traffic. The guy should have been cited https://www.click2houston.com/news/local/2021/03/04/ask-2-traffic-can-you-get-a-ticket-for-driving-in-the-left-lane/
9
@gsettlemyre for your reference you cannot use the left lane as you please. You pass and move to the other lane when there is no traffic or no reason to be in that lane
9
@IKhanNot thing is in this case the truck could have went in but the cammer decided to speed up which is dangerous and could have caused an accident. The cammer would be cited and would share liability in this case
9
@jason5897 being in a turn lane doesn't give right of way. If a car was already entering the intersection and you turned without a protected turn you would be at fault
9
@FelixUmbra then does that justify speeding up? The truck was nearly passing the cammer when the idiot decided to play the victim card by speeding up. You cannot have a car going the same distance next to you
9
@jamiepatterson1214 you failed to read the situation as it is. Red car had already established merging, but cammer sped up to cut them off. Once a car has begun merging, it is your responsibility to ensure you either slow down or move over, not speed up. That's why the cammer was cited.
9
@arrowinthehead9920 bullshit. It's near impossible and no reason for people to do that unless you decide to cut cutesy and cut people off without checking to see if it is clear
9
Worse is when they get whooped in public and pretend to be the victim. These people aren't fooling anyone but themselves.
9
@julius6238 give or take people sometimes forget they need to turn ahead. Just give them some space because I learned you can never trust anyone on the roads these days
8
#2 is another example of why people need to take a mental evaluation to have a license. The dumb lady decided to brake check and cross double yellow lines
8
@llorcol you must really love to tempt fate and think you are in the right for any accidents. The idiot had plenty of chances to either slow down or move to the right lane but chose to lay down his ego and dig his grave
8
@donnash5813 sometimes the freeways branch off and the left lane is used as the entrance (weird design.) It's common in LA especially when we have Interstate 5 North connecting to the 710 North and the 710 South connecting to the 5 South. Still doesn't excuse the jackass behavior though
8
 @christopherkirkpatrick1239 lol. Illegal passing? The cam driver didn't check his rear view mirror. I hope he got a counter lawsuit so he can lose money
8
Worse is when you have to go after their personal assets because no insurance. It's a real doozy
8
@theamaranth3351 still doesn't mean you hog. There was barely any traffic in front of you and you could have moved over but your ego prevented you from doing the right thing 🤦‍♂️
8
@Lucky8s except in this case there was enough room to pull behind the truck and there was a gap to fit in two or three cars in front of the cammer. So in that case the cammer was doing the wrong action and could have been cited
7
@marr737 true. There is one idiot who thinks the other party should bear fault as well but the car was already merging in but Karen wanted to show off her ego
7
@NatA02 it doesn't hurt to back off a bit though just to inflate your ego. I usually try to back off a bit if possible so people can get in.
7
No. It's the responsibility of someone who wants to merge to do so safely and not try to rush. Showing your blinker doesn't mean you have right of way.
7
And?
7
Bruh really? There were so many spots to park in but I guess some people are too lazy to walk
7
@jcodol3334 I bet his insurance dropped him if he had any and now he's being taken to court and is crying for mommy to bail him out.
7
@jacobfuller6530 omfg. You are not entitled to merge into a lane. It is the responsibility of any person merging to do so safely unless under certain conditions such as entering the freeway or when a lane ends. What if a car was behind the cammer and couldn't brake? Would you say the same thing?
7
@mars-bv3ps re read it please. Guy is saying cammer isn't at fault and is fighting for his life with that comment
7
Guy is asking for his ass to be handed to him. He'll be lucky if the other driver doesn't gun him down or run him over for his stupidity
6
You are supposed to speed up getting on the freeway. Smh
6
The guy has serious ego issues. Like bruh you brake checked them and decided to escalate the situation further. If anything the guy needs to be taking the bus instead of driving
6
david edbrooke-coffin so you defend the cammer acting like a douchebag?
6
Unfortunately most drivers in LA do this type of stunt. They aren't confused about exiting and want to bypass traffic as much as possible. Other times they don't pay attention to the road and want to cut to enter a freeway.
6
@adelerose7419 disagree on the avoidable part for this one.. A lot of people try to rush around construction crews just to get in front. The white car was speeding up just to merge at last minute, so he had fault as deemed by insurance. I usually try not to rush when merging and only do so when it's safe to do so.
6
@clipsedrag13 stupid stuff happens like that all the time in LA. That's why I rather let them in and get ticketed by the police afterwards
6
@freedomwillneverdie6600 lol. Can't accept fault can you Karen?
6
From the look of it the middle lane is primarily for entering and exiting the road. The CR-V may have used it to try to bypass traffic
6
@billst.1044 that's cool and all but this is Cali. There are doo doo brains everywhere
6
Amen. I would have shared it with everyone that I knew so the guy could be put on full blast and be the idiot of the day
6
I drive through that area to see my orthodontist and the design is similar to another area close by. Generally speaking the left lane is supposed to turn into the far left while the right turn lane can use the middle or right lane. Dash cammer is most likely at fault for this one.
5
@seekeroftruth6728 wrong in this case. I looked up the intersection and it's similar to a lot of others in the area. Far left lane is supposed to go into the left lane while the right left turning lane can go into the center or right lane. The guy just admitted to being at fault online. If you don't believe me you can look up the DMV handbook about dual left turning lanes onto one way streets.
5
@llorcol another thing to note was the idiot decided to speed up because he didn't want his ego to be hurt. One of these days you're going to get into an accident and everyone is going to tell you how stupid you are
5
That was after brake checking and illegal passing. If anything that lady needs to take the bus and banned for life with the driver's license
5
@cassiemyersconcertvids do you even know how hard it is to turn right with those buses or trucks? A bus or truck that big needs space to turn or else they risk running onto the sidewalk
5
@justcause9334 I would argue against that. Red car was already beginning to merge but cammer sped up to prevent it. Red car was already establishing lane control as well
5
@Zzachman13 disagree and the insurance would too. She has the chance to go in the middle and right lanes, cammer didn't. He's at fault
5
@DzibMoya another thing too: cars don't randomly spawn out of nowhere. You have to check your mirrors and look over your shoulder before merging or changing lanes. You need to get some hard life lessons before being behind the wheel
5
 @kispie doesn't matter. You don't try to pull in front of someone who may pass you. There are cases where the front car is given liability for stunts like this.
5
@brancracker no but the cam driver is at fault here so he will be the one dealing with more hedaches
5
@MaxZomboni another clueless driver who probably rages and gets manhandled
4
@duncansmith9285 sorry to disappoint but in most cases if you got into an accident you would be at fault since you failed to look to see if it was clear. It is your responsibility to see if it is okay to move over and to never assume that you can move over.
4
Then gtfo off the road. You aren't supposed to use the passing lane as you please. You would be cited and then become a laughing stock for the rest of us to enjoy
4
@peterpan31000 there are other cars behind. You aren't entitled to shit if you cut others off because you can't wait.
4
@DJJumpdancer wrong and wrong. Any defense that you would use about this wouldn't hold up. Know why? In some states general rule of thumb is that if someone can overpass you on the right and there is no traffic then you would be cited and found at fault for holding up traffic. The mustang did not pass or overtake any cars at that point so they were illegally using the left lane as you can only use it to overtake or pass traffic but as soon as you pass and there are no other cars to overpass then you have to move to the right lane.
4
@jinxiehYT wrong and wrong. An insurance company would find you at fault for failure to maintain your lane and changing when it isn't safe
4
@WasephWastar not to excuse the other guy but cammer has serious ego issues. He acted like he wanted to let the other guy in and then raged. He should take anger management classes
4
@billbeach2015 funny thing is he's still trying to defend himself. Ha. One day he'll be looking down a barrel and get shot
4
@rufen78 in that case I don't have to yield to oncoming traffic while making a left turn
4
@erwin6395 nope. Once a car establishes control of a lane, the other drivers must yield or slow down. Red car was merging at that point but Karen wanted to play victim
4
@jessesmusicmanor the red car was already merging at the point of time the cammer sped up. Cammer did not brake or let the car in, which led to their citation. Police most likely determined that the red car was already establishing control of the lane before the cammer cut them off. If a car has begun to merge and you hit them, they will issue a citation to you for failing to yield.
4
@dalesmith2061 Based on traffic flow, he could have used the middle lane since there was no excuse not to. General rule of thumb is you should use the middle lane if you are traveling for some miles and switch to the right lane if you plan to exit. It's what I do.
4
@tomm21 he's a Karen who cries for Mommy when he can't accept his own faults
4
@raminolta well, cammer may bear more responsibility and have to pay more through insurance
3
Tbh you shouldn't assume anything. I used to live in Vail and holy crap people did not know how to use roundabouts. People can be going straight or left which is why you shouldn't jump the gun because you're going to be found at fault.
3
@casmatori another funny thing is that the air breather took down their own video because they couldn't face public criticism
3
@benwagner5089 he started part of it by hogging the passing lane. Seriously like get the fuck out of the passing lane if you're not passing anyone or there is no traffic ahead. It's annoying when people do this
3
@samkdaily3055 in this case there are only two left turn lanes. The dash cammer is at fault for not turning into the proper lane, which is the far left one. The guy showed himself at fault online
3
@BartSparrow123 dependable. Red car was somewhat merging already but cammer did unsafe driving. It may be 75/25
3
@freedomwillneverdie6600 sorry but you are wrong in this case. I live near the area and most cases the left lane is supposed to maintain the left lane while the center left turn lane can use either the middle or right lane.
3
 @freedomwillneverdie6600 read the CA DMV book about left turns onto one way streets before opening your mouth and making yourself look dumb
3
@SilentBob84 depends. In some cases the cammer could be held liable if they intentionally decided to speed up and cut off any potential mergers. Mind you it is illegal to intentionally cut someone off and you could be cited in some cases
3
@Smurphenstein then the mustand shouldn't drive if they are going to be doing this type of stunt. It isn't new and people are too stupid to remember the basic rules of the road. At no point did the mustang (from the look of the video) overtake traffic which would mean if highway patrol and traffic court were to rule on this it would be against the favor of the mustang https://ksltv.com/446352/safe-in-60-how-to-use-the-passing-lane/?
3
@Tracert-mc1hu then learn to move over since you don't own the road. These types of idiots cause the rage and act like the victim when they can move over and it's not the end of the world
3
@muffinstuffin6 yeah. Guy is dumb as hell for waiting. Technically he should be found somewhat liable since he probably could have cleared the turn already but decided to act cute.
3
@MerpoBot if you cannot drive, then don't drive. I seriously hate people who want to act cute when there is room to turn right and there are no cars incoming. They are useless air breathers
3
@au1317 yes there is. On the I-10 freeway in the San Gabriel area the merging areas are often short and usually people know to merge. You cannot hold traffic up behind you and the person merging has to yield at all times
3
Dude is fighting for his life thinking he is right. I bet the judge will laugh at his stupidity
3
@bpregont nope. Law says you have to yield if you don't have right of way. You cannot turn unless you are safe to do so
3
@joycelebaron2582 so? Guy could have been a handyman, visitor or possible tenant going in. But hey this is America and I guess everyone is going to be butt lazy to park and walk
3
@debburess1573 the truck was no victim. I have seen idiots like her trying to bypass traffic during rush hour by pretending to exit only to try to jump ahead of other cars. This is recurring theme in L.A.
3
@chrisrosenbaum26 failure to yield would have been different if the lane hadn't already merged. The lines already started to end where the car was so the cammer got cited for failing to yield. Just because you have control of a lane doesn't mean you get off Scott free unless it can be determined the other driver cut you off while they didn't start merging.
3
@cameronadams4121 dude I live in LA and you do the last thing anyone in their sane mind would do. You don't go hunting down other drivers when there was no accident to report. Lucky for you you didn't get shot at because it isn't unheard of people shooting at others for road rage. Just let that shit go
3
@cameronadams4121 you still don't do that shit or pull stupid stunts like that. You're inciting road rage and the last thing you want to do is piss someone off. Seriously turn in your driver's license if you can't handle being behind the wheel
3
@nboddie1036 wrong. According to the DMV handbook, which apparently no one reads, if there are two left turn lanes going onto a one way street such as in this case, the one on the left must enter the far left lane while the right can enter the center or right lane.
3
@ThePhilipJFry__ maybe a suggestion: don't be egotistical and force your way in when you clearly have no patience in traffic. If you can't make you way in, always find another way to get back to where you want to go.
3
@dherzog02 you don't know how to drive or how a protected left turn is defined do you? Go to a police station and tell them the same thing you said right now and they will laugh at you.
3
@cappuccino-1721 you definitely need to chill out a bit. You are not the only one on edge from stress and what not but it's called not letting your emotions get the better of you while driving. You let your emotions get the better of you then you pose much of a danger to yourself and others. There are a lot of ways to vent such as drawing or making model kits
3
 @freedomwillneverdie6600 nice try. Bet you ride like a Karen and get ticketed for failing to stop at a stop sign
3
@a32tl thing is you don't need to go bragging about what type of car you own. Just say it was a hit and run or if it was a false alarm
3
@stevebeckerman4214 ignore the troll. He thinks he's in the right when he gets into accidents
3
@SilentBob84 wrong. I saw it and the cammer sped up
3
Would have to disagree. The yield sign is almost like a stop sign and you would treat it as such. If you are in the roundabout then the other cars have to wait until it is okay to go.
3
@jamiepatterson1214 well, have fun trying to prove that in court. If a car has already begun their merge aka is establishing control of the lane, then it is your responsibility to maintain a safe space. It would be a different story if the other party didn't move in
3
@emocarousel4103 in this case not really. I live in CA and in this case a car who fails to monitor the situation and cannot switch lanes but causes an accident is most likely going to carry all of the fault. I had a case a few years ago where I was in the far right lane about to make a right and a guy kept signaling to change lanes but never did. I pulled off my gas to let him in and then when he didn't I decided to go ahead when the guy decided to cross and hit me. Insurance deemed him at fault for the accident.
3
So it's okay to pretend to exit and then be a total a*hole to beat traffic?
3
@anthonyoden4393 er der. Are you stupid or what? You don't cut people off if they are speeding in the passing lane. You shouldn't drive if you pull this shit off
3
@sweetgracie1930 sorry to disappoint but he had room in front of the honda and the car in front. Plus there were no cars in front of him in which if an officer was there the guy would be cited since he only passed one car and wasn't passing any other ones. https://www.mit.edu/~jfc/right.html
3
@DzibMoya there is no excuse to drive without insurance. As a driver it is your responsibility to have it. I bet you if you got into an accident where the other driver didn't have it you would be pissed off with having to pay for the damages
3
@MrMcMuffinJr1999 wrong. The lane had already merged at that point so the cammer didn't have right of way when the other car was already merging. You're a laughing stock
3
@wakemiamigreatagain I didn't mention age did I? No. The issue is that she failed to maintain lanes and is a possible hazard if she thinks she is in the right. She shouldn't be driving. It's a privilege, not a right
3
I don't think they wanted to exit. From what I have seen living in LA, a lot of drivers pretend to exit only to jump back on the freeway to jump ahead in line. It's a common practice here.
3
@alwaysroaming1244 against. If there was a vehicle in the intersection, then any vehicles making a left need to yield. If the cam driver had gotten into an accident they could still have some liability and be cited.
3
Hate to break it to you but these drivers want to jump a few cars ahead during rush hour and have ego problems. See these types a lot in L.A.
3
@TruthHurtsFAFO depends. The guy was speeding up to cut off another driver and that could have caused an accident and the idiot could have been cited or been summoned to court
3
@muigamonkey lol. You are wrong in so many ways. Just because you live near there doesn't mean you understand basic traffic laws or liability. If a vehicle had entered the intersection after stopping and you tried to speed up and turn, you would be held liable for not yielding to oncoming traffic.
3
@rabfallon4507 there is something wrong with that statement. The cammer should've maintained their lane as the other was occupied. 100% fault on the cammer
3
@Twitch_Moderator doesn't matter. At this point you are to maintain your lane at all times. I've seen this shit so many times in Cali that it's become a joke
3
@timthefosterdad logic fail. They have signs saying to not block the intersection so to not block the flow of traffic. But hey, you are one of the entitled ones doing this so it's fine right?
3
@rorerj wrong. If the SUV had caused the accident the police officer would cite them for failure to yield. You can ask any police officer or CHP about this and they would say you are wrong.
3
The idiotic cammer didn't even pull to the side to let the other person pass. I do this when there is a narrow street and the other person who was there before should go first and then I go. He's a dumbass
2
@MaxZomboni that's cap. L + ratio
2
@chunkybones668 except you're wrong in this case. Dual left turns onto one way streets in California mean that the left turn lane must turn into the furthest left lane, not the center.
2
@casmatori yep. If anything someone needs to break their legs and shove them up their ass and break their hands as well. Driving is a privilege, not a right
2
@sionandtatev because sometimes the light might be out. I sometimes give benefit of the doubt to people since they may do something stupid and cut you off. I've had people use their indicators for a long time before changing
2
@dherzog02 wrong and wrong. Your definition of a stop sign is screaming people shouldn't go at all. Stop sign means you stop and proceed with caution, which is what the Lexus did. You probably throw fits all the time when people do this and act like a victim
2
@commonsence1129 lmao. Most drivers aren't any better when it comes to knowing how to drive and letting their emotions get the better of them. Besides that motorcycles can lane split in CA 🖕
2
@TheRealSykx actually you can. Ohio allows for people to pass on double yellow so long as it is safe
2
 @Driver_0ne ignore the tool. They probably get so many tickets and accidents where they are at fault but blame the other party
2
@Lucky8s but did he pass? No he didn't. That's where the problem is but you think that driving in the left lane is your right and you think people should go around when you decide to play cutesy
2
@Lucky8s the highway patrol could have pulled the idiot a lot faster and the cammer could have gone on his way. Jesus make up your fucking mind
2
@Lucky8s yeah I did and like I said the officer could have gone and resolved it sooner. Don't tell me what the fuck to do when you think you have every fucking solution
2
@peterpan31000 thing is though I let that shit go. If he spat then let someone else do the ass beating and enjoy the carnage. Back to the point this is nothing compared to the lines at In N Out. I've seen lines going out on the street so I park and do a walk up to get my order.
2
@BrandonDenny-we1rw someone who is already merging should have right of way already as they established that direction. Yes, red car shouldn't have done what they did but the cammer did nothing to prevent said accident and only escalated the situation without speeding up. If a car has already merged you can't do much but let it go. Plus there was room behind her so she could have braked and let them in instead of feeling like she owns the road
2
@caldodge I don't think it was the case where the bimbo was trying to pass but rather get to another freeway entrance. Still doesn't excuse the shitbrain though
2
Nope. Red car was already merging in and cammer had her feelings hurt
2
I can't tell since there was no rear camera and the subraru wasn't seen before that. But based on what is available it looks like the cammer probably cut off the white car. Still doesn't excuse the behavior though
2
@DougDougersons how original. I bet you drive like you own the road. Don't go crying when someone threatens your life because of your stupidity
2
While I do agree that the white dodge was being a douche, the other guy was just as wrong because he was traveling in the passing lane and not supposed to be in there
2
@joshuajackson5656 wrong. If you look closely they had a ton of space ahead of them. You are not supposed to be traveling in the passing lane unless you plan to overtake someone. Tyler did the wrong move in hogging it and getting an ego issue when someone wanted to bypass him
2
Concur. He was being a fuckboy and it seemed that he was driving slow to piss off the other guy and then stopped at the turn. Looks like he was doing an insurance scam
2
@jamiepatterson1214 are you looking at the right video or did you just assume we were talking about number 1?
2
No. Far left lane goes into the far left lane. Lady could go into middle or right lane.
2
@fozter8201 let me guess: you ride a bicycle and take up the road. Smh. Cyclists demand treatment when they don't stop at stop signs or traffic lights
2
@fozter8201 lol. Nice try. I have ridden a bike before but I don't go hogging roads or ride the sidewalks like some air breathers do. Cyclists always demand right of way even though they break so many road laws
2
@nispelsm I would have just turned the guy into a flat pancake and say he jaywalked when he shouldn't have. Circle of life
2
@Noliving so in your opinion people should just sit there all day waiting for traffic to pass through before going.
2
@jerrybrooks870 nope. From what I see, Lexus had time to clear it but cammer sped up and decided to play chicken. You can show this to police and ask what they think too if you want to. Just because there is a stop sign doesn't mean the person has to wait all day for someone to make their turn.
2
@jerrybrooks870 and fyi, you don't seem to know liability that much. If you submitted this to insurance, they probably would place liability on you because you don't have right of way if a car was in the intersection and you were turning left.
2
5:28 another reason why Cali drivers are air breathers. They stop to look at an accident and stall as if they got impacted. Ffs you are not first response
2
@tammygross144 your assessment is way off. CHP mentioned this on the news as quoted: "That's a very good question," said Sgt. Brian Pennings with the California Highway Patrol. "If you are the established vehicle, traveling on the roadway and want to execute the left turn (U-turn), you have established your right of way." "That person making the right turn has to yield to oncoming traffic that is close enough to constitute an immediate hazard prior to executing their turning movement, and that includes you making a U-turn, already established on that roadway."
2
 @solidmoon8266 actually wrong. Right turn person must yield. You can argue with CHP if you want to about this but I doubt they would want to agree with you.
2
@NotTheRealRustyShackleford you are way off on this one. In CA, you are allowed to make U turns in those intersections as long as there is no sign saying otherwise. I also looked up the location online and there is no green right arrow either, so your argument would not hold up.
2
@scottgarner8270 doesn't matter. You are to never assume a car in the left lane is making a left turn. It doesn't hurt waiting a few seconds for your turn. Can't tell you how many people fail at this and I have had the same experience where I was doing a U turn on a protected green and some idiot tried playing victim when they were making a right turn when there were cars in front and behind me.
2
@KStyleZx83 Thing is you don't have right of way and you don't own the road. If a lane is merging then fine, you can get in but it's up to the other driver. But if you want to change lanes all of a sudden because you won't paying attention or want to switch for the hell of it then that's on you. Honestly people are stupid when it comes to driving and it's become a cesspool
2
@freedomwillneverdie6600 thing was he had room to turn but didn't. It was like he was distracted or wanted to get a pay-out day. Either way, it doesn't mean the other driver is off the hook.
2
@FelixUmbra you may want to read this since the case can be against the cammer: https://www.injurylawpalmbeach.com/article/merging-accident/#:~:text=Maintain%20a%20Consistent%20Speed,never%20to%20surprise%20other%20drivers. This is from the website: For example, if the merging driver determines that they have enough room to move into the next lane, but a speeding driver hits them, the speeding driver caused the accident by driving unsafely. If the speeding driver had slowed down, the merging driver could have merged safely.
2
@Jesssalyer you would lose the case. If a car had already began to merge, you must yield. The judge would laugh at you and throw the book at you
2
@rogerwilcojr thing was the cammer was having a fit and decided to play cute by speeding up and cutting off the truck. You can also see the truck was almost going faster and the cammer decided to speed up and look like a victim. The guy needs to be taken off the road ffs.
2
@steverichter9825 yeah cammer was definitely wrong. He was supposed to turn into the far left lane while the lady could turn into the center or far right lane. His insurance is going to skyrocket after this since a lot of companies are raising premiums or dropping business all together in California.
2
@aragorn7968 you definitely should not drive. The guy had only passed one car and had a chance to move over but no he was a prick. You shouldn't drive if you are going to pull this stunt
2
@butai2116 agreed. Honestly though this whole thing could have been avoided if the other driver wasn't the prick that he was. If you can wait to merge behind it's not a big deal. If you miss the exit then take the next one. I miss my exits sometimes but I don't act like a douche and cut people off because I wouldn't want to create the problem. The cammer got his emotions out of control but he got angry because the other driver decided to play dumbass that day and it could have ended worse with one person dead over road rage.
2
@SilentBob84 are you high? Jesus you must think you own the road or something
2
@Nacho-yt7xo to me it looks like he sped up to pass again. Better choice was to merge in the right since there was little to no traffic ahead. I seriously have issues with people who do this and I always pull to the right if I'm not passing anyone
2
@christiandruan guy is trying so hard to defend himself. Ffs it's common knowledge to look while merging which is something he didn't take in account and almost caused an accident. He won't admit that he is at fault.
2
@commonsence1129 says the dumbass who can't accept when people call him out for driving 70 in a 65 area
2
@sweetgracie1930 https://www.autoinsurance.org/keep-right-which-states-enforce-left-lane-passing-only/ Cruising in the pass lane is pretty much illegal which in this case the cammer did. I highly doubt you would win this in traffic court since they would deem you at fault for causing unsafe driving conditions in which the cars in the other lanes were going faster than you.
2
@superbee2698 here: https://www.autoinsurance.org/keep-right-which-states-enforce-left-lane-passing-only/
2
@sweetgracie1930 nope. Sorry but your logic still wouldn't hold up even with traffic court or the highway patrol. Like it has been mentioned the passing lane is only for passing and he had plenty of room to pull over. If someone in Texas is going 75 on the right side and you are going 70 in the left who do you think they would cite? They would cite you for unsafe driving. You can argue all you want but in the end you would have both patrol and court disagree with you.
2
@sweetgracie1930 I have seen so many cases of this and it is both annoying and unsafe. You cannot use that lane as you choose and you will have both people cursing you out and a citation. You either speed up or you move over in which the cammer decided to play fast and slow since his ego was hurt. He was lucky he didn't end up on the wrong side since someone may have shot him for pulling this.
2
@sweetgracie1930 again your logic is wrong. The left lane is for passing in which the cammer only passed one at the time of the motorcycle was catching up. Your definition of the cammer passing is a joke and is laughable. The fact that there were barely any cars in front of the cammer and that he had room to pull over is common and you can't take the fact that you are in the wrong. One of these days you'll get beat up or even shot for doing this and when it happens you deserve it.
2
@sweetgracie1930 I could show this to my friend who works for CHP and he would agree with me. Your argument would become invalid in court and you would be at fault since the left lane is for passing and not for being slow. He didn't even speed up until the motorcycle had to pass him and you defend him. Makes me think you have no common sense and you shouldn't drive if you think like this.
2
@sweetgracie1930 yet you keep going on and on about how the cammer is right when you aren't even following common sense or the law. For ** sake I pull over when there is a car behind me and I don't hog the passing lane even at 70. You are an airhead who thinks that if someone who clearly has enough room to pull over should continue. You're what is wrong with the driving of the US and that is why when you do something stupid like this you deserve every ounce of Karma headed your way
2
@commonsence1129 I am saying if you can't drive stay the hell off the roads because you don't own them. If you can't drive fast and pass in the left lane then you need to have your license revoked for life
2
@sweetgracie1930 well my friend got back and said the car was in the wrong. As I mentioned and he agreed the driver had plenty of room and a chance to move over. So you will have to back out of this one since you were incorrect and could cause an accident or traffic
2
@commonsence1129 no. I'm saying if you want to hover in the left lanes when 1) there is no traffic in front of you and 2) people are wanting to pass but have to go around you since you impede the flow of traffic you shouldn't drive. Obviously you are one of those idiots who thinks they own the road and can use it any way they want to. One of these days you're going to piss off someone and either get a ticket or worse get your ass beaten or shot at
2
@briezzy365 how? You do know you are allowed to go around cars if it is a broken yellow line right?
2
@Simfight don't see the stop sign for the cammer. This is one of those cases where incoming traffic from the street don't usually have stop signs
2
@JazznRealHipHop in that case have fun with insurance going up and having tickets
2
@freedomwillneverdie6600 quiet kiddo. You don't have a right to drive
2
@CurtinChad you must be blind because I saw the other car switch lanes already and the cammer wanted to play cute and cut them off.
2
Pretty sure you cannot park a car in the middle of the road without hazard lights. You cannot leave a car unattended on a public road
2
@cristianp010 I'm getting real tired about this. As the person merging you have a responsibility to make sure that you can do so and not be the jackass of the day.
2
@cristianp010 but at the same time though you have to ensure there is enough space to brake though. What if a car is right behind you? Sure you can brake if there is no traffic behind you but if there are cars behind you then you may not be able to brake. That's why for me if I merge I don't jump the gun right away and wait to see if it is safe to do so by making sure that there is enough space and I'm not impeding the flow of traffic
2
@maciejzielinski1274 you are responsible for ensuring you can merge safely, not the other driver. Most if not all of the time the insurance will deem you at fault. Have seen this multiple times
2
Agreed. The cammer should be held both criminally and civil liable. They were doing something they weren't supposed to
2
4:27 oh yes. The crazies of the 626 area. Smh. Half of these knitwits have expensive cars and don't know how to drive
2
Depends. Usually insurance can run into different timeframes (i.e. my license will expire in April but the insurance runs from March to September.)
2
@punchodex2 wrong in this case. You can look at the design of Rosemead and Las Tunas Drive and you will see that the lanes are designed in that left most lane must turn into left lane while the one of the right can use either center or right lane. DMV handbook also states the same thing for one way streets
2
@MyNameisJeffReacts you need to talk to police more often before opening your mouth and going on a rant.
2
@stevefoss5486 no. People need to stop being a-holes and trying to run the light to make a right turn. I cannot tell you how many idiots don't wait and act like victims when they are required to yield. People need to stop assuming that you are turning left and just wait for a bit.
2
@MisterMA77H3W well it would be up to the court and whoever has jurisdiction over that part of the road (assuming it is highway patrol.) But in this case I would think that the mustang if it was driving on the highway could be partially at fault for driving in the left lane when there is no traffic at all and it could be cited for causing traffic
2
@yungkidnf again that is a different scenario that you mentioned than what is here. You can argue all you want but the video shows a black honda had taken up the space and the grey car couldn't go through. The idiot failed to use proper judgment and ended up blocking the cammer from going through. The other light wouldn't have turned green instantly and let the silver car through. The cammer had reason to believe they could pass and had justification. Plus from what I and many others have done is that if I feel that I cannot go through in time I let the other driver go ahead anyways, especially since traffic in LA is a mess and at times can be backed up.
2
@adammiller9179 better safe than be sorry. Some people will pull a fast one and change multiple lanes. I saw one happen the other day where some guy was in a right lane and decided to hop all the way over to the left turning lane. Like I said you should never assume something because people sometimes pull a fast one and you can wait until there isn't much traffic coming in
1
@AlvinEranus nope. A person who has a stop sign has to yield to incoming traffic. That means you wait until you are sure you can go. You can never assume because a lot of things can change
1
The one on the right
1
@scottbrady9477 pretty much. Dual left turn lanes means that if there are two cars making turns at the same time, they are supposed to go into the far left lane (of course, there are exceptions) and the one on their right can go into the center or right lane.
1
@jeffrains9569 yeah you don't know how to drive. Please take the bus or bike
1
@TheChepiksacc sorry to burst your bubble but the evidence seems to show that the cammer wanted to run the Raptor off the road. The Raptor moved back to the fast lane when the cammer tried to play cute.
1
Good luck with that. Even lawyers wouldn't be able to fight the case
1
Nah. Shoot him a few times and leave the body to be ran over by traffic. Saves time and paperwork
1
https://codes.findlaw.com/pa/title-75-pacsa-vehicles/pa-csa-sect-75-3353.html It says you cannot park a car like that and impede traffic. Pretty sure the person who parked there did so illegally
1
Cammer was wrong. He was supposed to turn into the furthest left lane..
1
@johnt.848 nope. Read the DMV handbook. Dual left turn lanes means that the far left lane goes into the furthest left lane and the one on the right can go into a center or right lane. His fault
1
@johnt.848 lol. Stupid response coming from someone who doesn't know traffic laws and I bet if you did this stunt and filed the insurance claim they would drop you on the spot. Even police would be happy to give you a ticket
1
 @johnt.848 lol. Says the idiot who can't read. Read Section 6 of the DMV handbook you tool
1
@johnt.848 better yet how about I go to a CHP officer or Monterey Park and show them the video and get a response. If you're wrong, I'll post it to where you get called out and humiliated every day from then on.
1
@CobraGhoul true but at the same time the one turning could have made that turn had the cammer not been a Karen and act entitled
1
@Xenotale8268 1:11
1
This is the US and yield means to go with caution. It's almost like a stop sign and the rule is that if you have to yield to other vehicles in the roundabout
1
#1 is a daily occurrence in LA. Half of the dimwits will wait until last minute just to merge and play victim #6 is why people hate Teslas. They are entitled douchebags who think they own the road and do stupid things half the time
1
@sionandtatev I live in the SGV and let me say half the time people will go cut you off even without using turn signals. That's why I lay off the accelerator and let people go full retard because when they get into an accident they get shocked Pikachu faced
1
LA is full of shit lickers where people who shouldn't drive have licenses. The Lexus driver is something that happens a lot in my area.
1
@SilentBob84 wtf. You must be one of those idiots who thinks they own the road. Ffs one of these days you're going to get your ass handed to you
1
@IKhanNot and you don't seem to know that in this case the cammer could be found at fault: For example, if the merging driver determines that they have enough room to move into the next lane, but a speeding driver hits them, the speeding driver caused the accident by driving unsafely. If the speeding driver had slowed down, the merging driver could have merged safely. This is from a website for an injury attorney. The right to yield means you don't speed up to prevent someone from getting in and causing an accident. Seriously you should read up on this stuff since you pull it the court is going to go against you and your insurance rate would go up
1
 @FDNY101202 check the other video. Cammer was a dumbass and cut off the Honda earlier and literally cries victim when he does the same thing
1
@theamaranth3351 again with the stupid excuses. You don't hog a left lane when you barely have any traffic in front. You're lucky if someone doesn't shoot you for pulling a stunt like this
1
@MikeJones-bl6lu wrong and wrong. The speed limit is only recommended but depending on situations you can either go faster or slower than traffic. Some officers will allow you to go up to 5 mph faster if you are bypassing slower traffic
1
@danielbode6949 do it and get in an accident with him. And then sue the shit out of him so he can be broke and have to use a bus instead
1
@sopwithsnoopy8779 yeah but at the time the truck had passed but hey since I'm the idiot and you think you are so smart you can do whatever you want. One of these days I hope you get your ass handed to you
1
@UCK9cPT9f8U-x3OJ_f30QgDw whatever. Since you think you are so smart go lecture people why don't you? God damn
1
@mrlt1151 would have done everyone a favor and gotten rid of one rotten egg
1
 @christopherkirkpatrick1239 oh look. Professional victim who always blames the other person when they are at fault
1
@BrandonDenny-we1rw did I say break the law? No. The courts and insurance may determine a higher liability for one of the drivers in this case. Insurance will always determine the fault based on whether the accident was preventable and who caused it. It's the job of the driver to prevent said accidents from happening to reduce liability. For example, if I was driving in the far right lane that was turning right and another driver had shown their turn signal to merge but didn't do so at last minute while I gave them plenty of opportunities to do so while maintaining a safe speed, do you think the insurance will held me or the other driver more liable?
1
@BartSparrow123 like I mentioned in another reply, insurance may deem more fault on her as she said there was room to merge behind her but decided to escalate the situation. Insurance will determine based on whether accident was preventable and which party failed to drive safely. I have gotten into a similar incident a few years back where a SUV had their turn signal on for a minute or two but didn't merge. I was in the far right lane which turned right in an intersection and had backed off to let them in. They didn't do anything and when I decided to speed up a little (1 or 2 mph), they merged and hit me. Their insurance claimed full responsibility since I had maintained a safe distance and didn't speed up to let them in.
1
@BrandonDenny-we1rw wrong. The other driver was deemed 100 percent at fault. Mind you this was on the streets, not the freeway. The road I was driving on had the far right lane turning right onto an upcoming intersection. The SUV had their turn signal on for a minute or so but didn't merge. I had slowed down as there was no traffic behind me to let them in. They kept driving straight and when I was near them, they hit my driver side, causing some paint damage and damage to the driver side mirror. Had I sped up and hit them, it may have been different.
1
@BrandonDenny-we1rw no but it's similar. As mentioned, the cammer may have more liability for failing to prevent an accident. Ask any lawyer and they will say the same thing.
1
@BrandonDenny-we1rw plus with the cammer being cited she may have more to prove on her end since she may end up paying more. If the judge reviews the evidence and determines the ticket stands, the cammer loses more than the other driver.
1
@BrandonDenny-we1rw lmao. Keep it up. I have people who work for CHP and know lawyers. They would still point out the same thing. Cammer had caused the whole incident and you still can't accept it. Tells a lot about your victim mentality and trying to blame other drivers for your problems. Seriously take the damn bus
1
@BrandonDenny-we1rw oh yes. Typical excuse for a dead brain. You can drive on the shoulder to avoid accidents or are you stupid? Your reading skills are that of a 1 year old
1
 @freedomwillneverdie6600 lol. Bet you lose in court 24/7 when it comes to accidents. Keep running your stupid mouth
1
 @freedomwillneverdie6600 lol. Keep running your stupid mouth
1
 @johnt.848 another stupid response from someone who can't do basic reading or research
1
@DJJumpdancer it's your problem in that you escalated the situation and caused it. Seriously the cops will look at your dashcam and question what you were doing taking the passing lane and not going any faster than other traffic and hopping 4 lanes to exit
1
@Jay D check his channel and see what he did earlier to that Honda. The cammer literally cries victim when he pulled that stunt and nearly caused an accident..
1
@SamLemont lol. I bet you are at fault for most accidents you cause
1
@seekeroftruth6728 traffic code? Read the DMV handbook before mouthing off and embarrassing yourself online.
1
 @seekeroftruth6728 lol. Spoken like someone who has no brain. If I showed this to the police and they say the same thing I pointed out, I'm gonna post the video online and call you out publicly
1
@CyberWomble check the original video. Cammer was a douche for speeding up to cut off someone when they didn't have right of way and got retaliation in the end. Not saying Honda was right but ffs check your mirrors before merging because you can get screwed over
1
 @ITBOILSMYBLOOD check his channel. There was a rear view video of him cutting off the honda earlier and accelerating when he had no room to. He literally had karma kick his ass for that move..
1
@punchodex2 no she can use either the center or right lane. If there are two cars in each lane, left one has to go into the left lane while right one can go into center or right lane. Insurance would deem the dash cammer at fault
1
 @iFixJunk it's the rules of the road according to DMv Section 6. This intersection design isn't uncommon btw. Seen lots of the design around the area and they all follow the same concept
1
 @thelastdragon5551 L take ratio
1
@joshuajackson5656 omfg. So you're telling me I should hog the passing lane. Ok. Then if someone rages at me and I get shot I'll tell the other person that you told me that it was okay to do that
1
No. It is the responsibility of the merger to ensure enough room is there to be let in. You do not own the road and do not have a right to cut people off
1
@dherzog02 disagree on this one. If you had entered the intersection after stopping but the other driver decides to speed up and try making a left turn when you are already past the stop sign, you would be held liable regardless if you had right of way.
1
@Greydawg I get what you say about letting it go but unfortunately they don't care about the rules of the road. All these people care about is cutting a few cars ahead to save time when everyone is stuck in traffic. At the end of the day, they just showed they shouldn't have a license.
1
No and no. The guy clearly does insurance fraud and decides to speed up to get a paycheck. If anything he needs his license revoked
1
@nickbrockman5753 that's kind of strange since I think the traffic light is designed to only let one section through at a time. I could be wrong though
1
@Sleepyhead54 not really. I have seen these things all over in LA and I remember one of my friends had done the exact same thing except it was a bus turning left. They skipped by a few feet and got hit. Insurance and police found the bus not at fault. There is a reason why they have those and it's because some roads/vehicles require huge turns.
1
@Sleepyhead54 if they got hit before the white lane that would may have been a different story altogether but you have to do defensive driving first and not try to skip a line and stop.
1
@ArtyMcKenzie you do know people have claimed fake injuries and commit fraud right? Lawyers aren't there to be your buddy. They are looking for lawsuits to make money
1
 @fozter8201 lol. Nice deflection. I can't tell you how many times riders have broken the laws here in California. You are stupid beyond belief
1
@ihazdashcam use of full lanes is allowed only at certain times even in Ohio. General rule of thumb is they have to stick to the right side of the road and cars can pass them. It is not illegal to pass a cyclist as long as it safe and reasonable to do so. CCC § 2173.04(A).: Ride as near to the right side of the roadway as “practicable.” The City Code requires a bicyclist to ride as far to the right side as is reasonable under the circumstances. But do not ALWAYS ride as near to the right side of the roadway as possible.
1
@IvyEvans one point that I want to say is that you cannot slam the brakes or slow down if there is traffic behind you as you would be causing an accident. That said it boils down to how traffic is going and if there is enough space to spare the person getting in
1
@IvyEvans lmao. Tell that to the accidents that occur in LA. You've probably never seen how bad traffic can get here and it's bumper to bumper a majority of the time.
1
@adelerose7419 disagree again. Right of way is given to people who have control of the lane. Braking wouldn't make much of a difference since we don't know if there were cars behind the cammer either. White car was deemed at fault as most insurance companies will point out. It's your fault if you can't merge properly.
1
@commercialvehicleaccountab108 dude, go stfu to someone else. We don't give two *** about your ego
1
@timthefosterdad ROW is irrelevant unless you prove that you had intent to turn within 300 feet. After that point it's your fault if you decided to go straight afterwards
1
@casmatori yeah well when that happens they deserve to be shot in the head for their own stupidity
1
@jerrybrooks870 That's not how it works. If a person had already entered the intersection and you want to turn left without a stop sign, you would be held liable by the officer. Your argument of a protected left turn is a straw man at best since they are still required to yield if there is a vehicle that already entered the intersection. A protected left turn is guaranteed if you have right of way and no other vehicles can enter the intersection at the time you are making the turn (i.e. everyone has stop signs or there is a green arrow for left turning.)
1
@dherzog02 no they weren't. Argue as much as you want and try showing it to the police. If a vehicle is already in the intersection then you cannot make a left turn like a tool.
1
@barnabyjones2203 yes and yes. I can show this clip to a CHP buddy of mine and have him give a break down if you want to. I can also ask my insurance about it as well. Just because you can make a left turn doesn't give you protection from liability. The cam driver had made a left turn in front of a vehicle that was in the intersection and mind you a bit earlier than what should be normally done.
1
No it won't. Know why? The red car was merging and cammer had caused unsafe driving in the situation. Most likely share fault
1
@kybalion848 thing is cammer could have pulled over to the side of the road but at the same time there was no other way to pass. In Cali it is illegal to pass using double yellow lines.
1
@mace400 nah. Tesla drivers are entitled pos who think they own the road.
1
@mace400 lol. Why would I buy a 40k piece of crap that insurance won't cover for paint damage? Tesla are a joke
1
@mvpfocus nope. Even if you travel up to 300 feet you have to turn. After 300 feet you go straight you are held liable
1
@swinde don't know about you but usually I use hand signals to let them through during the daytime. At night I use high beams to let them through
1
#1: another idiotic truck who can't accept when they are wrong. Like seriously gtfo and turn your license in since you let too much air into your stupid brain
1
 @muigamonkey your judgment is severely lacking. The Lexus had already entered the intersection before the dash cammer could turn. Put that argument in court and you would be the laughing stock
1
You'd be surprised how often this occurs in Denver. Last year when I went to visit my old hiding spots some of them would think they own the road. Pissed me off and I wanted to turn them into pancakes
1
@Grizazzle buzz. Wrong. If you got into an accident by making a right turn while the other party made a legal U turn, the police would cite you for failure to yield. CHP has talked about this subject with the news.
1
@kenbrown2808 wrong as well. Most traffic lights in California don't have a green arrow unless it is prohibited to make a U turn at which case most traffic lights have an additional arrow on the bottom.
1
@solidmoon8266 "That's a very good question," said Sgt. Brian Pennings with the California Highway Patrol. "If you are the established vehicle, traveling on the roadway and want to execute the left turn (U-turn), you have established your right of way. That person making the right turn has to yield to oncoming traffic that is close enough to constitute an immediate hazard prior to executing their turning movement, and that includes you making a U-turn, already established on that roadway." Good job on trying but failing to follow traffic laws. When you get into an accident for failing this, I hope everyone laughs at you.
1
For anyone still saying the dash cammer is wrong and the other driver had a green arrow, open Google Maps and look up the address of 5351 Kearny Villa Road, San Diego, CA 92123. There is no green arrow for right turns, so please think before spewing out nonsense.
1
@tomcorey9833 hahahaha. You are way off on this one. No person in a business district shall make a U-turn, except at an intersection, or on a divided highway where an opening has been provided in accordance with Section 21651.This turning movement shall be made as close as practicable to the extreme left-hand edge of the lanes moving in the driver's direction of travel immediately prior to the initiation of the turning movement, when more than one lane in the direction of travel is present. So you take the L on this one.
1
@scottgarner8270 L ratio on the last part. You are required to yield and treat any U turns as a left turn when you are making a right turn. I already quoted someone from CHP about this.
1
@tammygross144 wrong again. Right turn was being executed at the same time as the U turn. L ratio
1
@k.o.h3599 speed limit is relative and doesn't mean you have to be going the same speed as posted. You can go 70 to pass someone and the CHP wouldn't cite you. If you went 75 or above that would be a different story.
1
That first lady is going to get shot one of these days if they do that stunt to the wrong person. She got lucky that the first one wasn't willing to mow her down.
1
@mijrelgeits4751 tell me you got into accidents where you are at fault without telling me. You have a ego where one day you will end up in the grave
1
@mayhemquads9147 I'm talking about the Honda. He raged for no reason and acted like a karen
1
Are you taking about the Z Edge air breather? Smh he shouldn't lecture when he almost causes most of the accidents that we saw
1
 @punchodex2 you want me to get a response from the local police and post it online? They will say the same thing I said right now
1
@crazieman no. You are supposed to speed up to pass any slow traffic. You are not going to be cited for going 5 mph over the speed limit in order to go around others. Please tell me that you don't actively drive because you need lessons
1
@THRASHMETALFUNRIFFS the light was yellow. It doesn't mean go speeding up just to make it across the intersection.
1
@edgeofentropy3492 that is incorrect. The cammer sped up and did not take proper precautions as well. I wouldn't be surprised if he would be found partially at fault since he did try to speed up instead of braking
1
@jcodol3334 ignore the air breather. He's good for nothing except showing off his lack of a brain
1
@nikkob1252 true that. However it's better to play it safe since people are on edge and who knows what might happen. The F150 could have had a firearm and shot at the cammer. It's better to be aware of your surroundings than to play stupid
1
@mvpfocus sorry but wrong. The cammer has to be turning left in order to prove they aren't liable. From the looks of it they were attempting to bypass traffic which is illegal
1
 @tokero5199 so you think cutting in line to jump a few cars ahead in traffic is okay?
1
So you defend cutting someone off like that?
1
@TomDarkwulf87 oh please. The cammer was one thing but the other driver was lucky he didn't get shot and killed. Remember it is the responsibility of the person merging to make sure it is safe to do so and not act like a fucking air breather
1
@CurtinChad I would kind of argue against this considering how they were going. If a person needed to make a right turn immediately it would be receipe for disaster. And based on the cam drivers actions I would point out he has no self awareness or defensive driving. He needs to take drivers ed again
1
@freedomwillneverdie6600 lol. If it isn't the beta karen who can't accept fault
1
@freedomwillneverdie6600 lol. I bet when you get into accidents where you are at fault you cry and beg for mommy to help you. Grow up Karen
1
@tony_25or6to4 nope. I would run the guy over and say he tried to engage. I'll be laughing at the funeral
1
 @carterwellsmith5833 a freaking men. The guy was an idiot for trying to speed up instead of braking just to save a few seconds. Guy needs to have his license revoked.
1
@shaunholt this is in California and there are other intersections designed like this. Most cases where there are three lanes the far left lane must use enter the left lane while the right lane can go into the center or right lane. Cammer just proved he is at fault online
1
@PtylerBeats you do know what a passing lane is right? And the fact you had no good reason to actually use it proves how stupid you were. Move over if you're not passing people in the right 3 lanes
1
@RPG-oh1yf that is not always true. Some freeway entry lanes, especially in LA, are short and traffic is a nightmare sometimes where you have to wait to merge. The 110 freeway going from downtown to Pasadena uses stop signs due to the fact that there is no merging lane.
1
@HSRUA427 and he's fighting for his life in his comments. True L + ratio
1
@pfcande uh no. False information and you are misleading
1
@WhatsY0UTUB3 it is your responsibility to check the road while trying to bypass. Ffs get your shit together
1
@JediTev more like insurance fraud
1
@Neko.Virtual do you even know how difficult it is to turn right, especially on those small roads? Drive one of these things and I bet you wouldn't last a day with that kind of stupid mentality
1
@darthbalgarus6986 omfg. You must be one of those dimbults who thinks they own the road. Seriously go turn your license in and take the bus
1
No. In California a double yellow lane means you cannot pass another vehicle. It's only if the yellow line on your side is broken that you can pass. https://www.all-about-car-accidents.com/resources/auto-accident/state-car-accident-law/when-can-i-cross-double-yellow-line-califo
1
@dieseldog4280 yeah but it could have caused an accident. Cars don't brake on a dime
1
@arox4133 I'm just saying that you don't merge like that. Who knows what might happen? Do you think the insurance would side with the merger or with the one in the lane if an accident were to happen? This type of stupidity makes me wonder how the fuck people can drive
1
@joshuakingbird1227 "while not a lot of room." There is a problem with that since the red driver could have caused an accident and be held at fault
1
@UCZJYgm9MbskmCiAy3pqaWqA and I guess I'm the fucking idiot for not knowing that if you don't have enough room to pass you should do it then. Listen: I'm fucking not going to repeat myself. You as the merger have a responsibility to make sure you have enough room to pass between cars. If the car in front brakes suddenly then do you think they are going to say the other person is at fault? I seriously swear I'm going to lose it
1
@UCZJYgm9MbskmCiAy3pqaWqA ok fine. The cammer is at fault. I guess I should act like a fucking idiot and let people merge even if it isn't safe to do so. I'm going to keep my mouth shut
1
@azlefty1 oh and who is to say the cammer couldn't have caused an accident? You don't know that. Oh but hey if some jackass is riding on my back and a guy in front wants to merge when there is barely enough space to do so has the right of way according to you
1
@UCa9GsqIuQU9u-IQsTpgwMfg oh fuck off. I don't do stupid shit behind the wheel and never piss of anyone else on the road. I don't go cutting off the other driver and if I feel it isn't safe to merge I wait until I have big enough distance in front and no close cars from behind. I live in LA and traffic here is bad on the 5 south where I have to slow down and make the best judgment
1
@bernds6587 I admit if I make mistakes but I don't do this shit because I rather take my time getting to where I need to go and not piss someone off to have them chase me down. I even take the side streets to go around traffic and I have survived
1
@dieseldog4280 tell that to the guy who may be behind. LA has this shit all the time
1
@fruityapples2429 the fuck. I don't even have a Nexar camera. Want me to show the difference air breather?
1
@fruityapples2429 because if you want to change lane you have a responsibility to make sure you can do so safely. I don't do this and have you ever seen traffic in LA? LA traffic is bad especially going towards Ontario in the evening time and towards downtown in the morning. I don't change lanes as much and if I could I would have to ensure that there is sufficient room in between the front and back. The front car sometimes might hit the brakes and I rather not risk it since I don't want my insurance to go up. You don't know if the person in front might brake suddenly and then boom. The cammer might have fucked up by speeding up but if the driver in front hit the brakes suddenly then it would cause a multiple car accident.
1
@fruityapples2429 this shit has happened to me on multiple occasions in which some would act like a douchebag and cut me off when it wasn't safe to do so since there wasn't enough space to make a safe lane change and traffic was behind me and if I braked then the car behind might hit my rear bumper. Mind you I could have been involved in the accident and it's a drag having to report these types of things with insurance and the DMV
1
@kkehoe5 this was in California. You are not supposed to occupy the left lane as it is technically a passing lane only. If you are not passing anyone you are supposed to move over to let others pass. I see this all the time and it gets annoying because others want to pass but some air breather decides to be a buddy fucker and screw everyone else over
1
@johnt.848 lol. And you must lack any reading skills. Look up the DMV handbook online about dual turning lanes before speaking and making yourself a joke. BTW, if police showed up, the cammer would be cited.
1
@johnt.848 read the DMV handbook. Also, look at the design of the intersection of Rosemead Blvd. and Las Tunas Dr. Same exact design where left most turning lane must enter the left lane upon completing the turn. You are showing no intelligence
1
@johnt.848 lol. Okay, show this to any officer in CA and they will laugh at you and call you an idiot
1
@imabosssorta1923 true but I wouldn't be surprised if the cammer had been cited due to speeding instead of slowing down at the intersection
1
@IKhanNot not every merging case will be in the favor of the lane that isn't ending. You may want to reconsider since the cammer could be at fault and would be held responsible https://www.injurylawpalmbeach.com/article/merging-accident/#:~:text=Maintain%20a%20Consistent%20Speed,never%20to%20surprise%20other%20drivers.
1
1:02: you're a idiotic cammer who doesn't even know to turn his damn head. I hope you get your license revoked for this stunt
1
@unlimited9789 sorry to disappoint but you are in the wrong. Most states will say that the left lane is for faster traffic or those passing. You can get citations for blocking traffic
1
@unlimited9789 here is the law for each state since you seem lazy and think you own the road https://www.mit.edu/~jfc/right.html
1
@revamp8835 they need to make it a requirement to see if you are competent enough to hold the license. If not then ban the license for life
1
@Freewheeler40 no, old people shouldn't drive either. The problem that I have is that some groups have problems with judgment and competency. They give driver licenses away too easily and need to have a two point system where the first offense can lead to a 1 year suspension and the second is no driving allowed.
1
Nah. Let them be killed. The motorcycle made a bad example of those who follow the law
1
@Hexnilium so in your mind it's cool to cross 4 lanes of traffic and when you get hit from behind by not checking you are not at fault? Cool
1
@TheMoogoescow still the cammer did engage in part of it since he decided to speed up and honk. The truck was going faster but the cammer decided to be the douche that day. I don't think the truck would be the only one at fault since the cammer decided to speed up and cause an improper merge
1
And then you have air breathers saying the lady is wrong. Some people should not be driving at all
1
@dethbygaming wrong again. Two left turn lanes means the one on the furthest left must use the far left lane while the right left turning lane can go in the center or right.
1
@CurtinChad even then you shouldn't do the same stunt the cammer did because you are causing unsafe driving conditions for the other drivers. I wait until someone who is changing lanes clears before going
1
@FlamingBasketballClub the guy was in a passing lane and there is no traffic or reason not to move over. The guy decided to play dumbass and hog the lane as if he owns the road
1
1:40 lady calm the fuck down. You ain't dead or injured. Jesus she needs to go to an anger management class
1
@NWChickenDad dumb comment from someone who doesn't know how trucks needs to make wide turns
1
@alwaysroaming1244 Again, legal standpoint of ROW does not mean turn when you feel like it. ROW is guaranteed if there were no cars or all cars had stopped to let the car make their turn before proceeding. You are defining a stop sign as wait all day and don't go when it is stop and proceed when you can. You can argue as much as you want but your legal definition of Right of Way is wrong in this case.
1
@alwaysroaming1244 so in your mind you always think you should have priority. You are one dense person who probably yells at the other driver when you make unprotected left turns as traffic passes by. Stop sign doesn't mean stop and wait for a whole day to pass by to leave. If the cammer had slowed down and waited for the Lexus to clear the intersection then there wouldn't have been a problem.
1
@dherzog02 stupid comment. So you say for the Lexus to stop in the middle of the intersection and wait for the cammer to make their turn. You people never cease to amaze me with the dump that is America.
1
@dherzog02 and Right of Way is defined but you seem to think you should have priority. In traffic law, right of way is the right to proceed; also, “right-of-way.” Many state statutes lay out various circumstances when drivers must yield the right of way, and most states grant pedestrians the right of way.
1
@alwaysroaming1244 lol. Have fun with that argument when you get into an accident and have some liability. When you lose in court I will laugh at you
1
@notthefather3919 how so? Some of these roads have no dividing lanes and they cannot be one way streets (hence they can be private). Unless someone can point it out then the cammer isn't in the wrong here
1
@excaliburao9314 technically the person was driving unsafe. Yellow means to slow down and use caution. If the driver was in the intersection when the light was turning yellow he could have sped up but decided to act stupidly by speeding up to save a few seconds. I wouldn't be surprised if the person has a long history of unsafe driving on their record
1
@yungkidnf no. The silver car could in no way clear the intersection. They had to wait since they couldn't get in with the light turning red. If a cop was around the honda would be cited.
1
@RidingWithBobby did you even pay attention? The fucker decided not to look and merge almost causing an accident. The cammer needs to be cited for this shit
1
FYI since you seem to think that you own the fucking road, if the idiotic cammer got into an accident who do you think they would hold liable for the situation? Not the Tesla since it was nearly bypassing the dumbass of an excuse.
1
@kenbrown2808 wrong actually. You might want to look at the address of 5351 Kearny Villa Road, San Diego, CA 92123 since there is no green arrow for right turns.
1
@Earthneedsado-over177 then have fun changing signs for so many intersections. I live near LA and there are traffic lights without the signage.
1