Comments by "jsoe81657" (@jsoe81657) on "GUY GETS PIT MANEUVERED IN MERGING ROAD RAGE INCIDENT" video.

  1. No. 1: you sped up to try to cut the other driver off. Keep crying Karen
    163
  2.  @mijrelgeits4751  unfortunately she sped up when the red car was about to merge. She caused a situation and blew it up
    130
  3. @minecraftfox4384  nice try. Red car was already merging and cammer got butthurt.
    13
  4. @jamiepatterson1214  you failed to read the situation as it is. Red car had already established merging, but cammer sped up to cut them off. Once a car has begun merging, it is your responsibility to ensure you either slow down or move over, not speed up. That's why the cammer was cited.
    9
  5.  @marr737  true. There is one idiot who thinks the other party should bear fault as well but the car was already merging in but Karen wanted to show off her ego
    7
  6.  @justcause9334  I would argue against that. Red car was already beginning to merge but cammer sped up to prevent it. Red car was already establishing lane control as well
    5
  7.  @erwin6395  nope. Once a car establishes control of a lane, the other drivers must yield or slow down. Red car was merging at that point but Karen wanted to play victim
    4
  8. @jessesmusicmanor  the red car was already merging at the point of time the cammer sped up. Cammer did not brake or let the car in, which led to their citation. Police most likely determined that the red car was already establishing control of the lane before the cammer cut them off. If a car has begun to merge and you hit them, they will issue a citation to you for failing to yield.
    4
  9. @raminolta  well, cammer may bear more responsibility and have to pay more through insurance
    3
  10.  @BartSparrow123  dependable. Red car was somewhat merging already but cammer did unsafe driving. It may be 75/25
    3
  11. @chrisrosenbaum26  failure to yield would have been different if the lane hadn't already merged. The lines already started to end where the car was so the cammer got cited for failing to yield. Just because you have control of a lane doesn't mean you get off Scott free unless it can be determined the other driver cut you off while they didn't start merging.
    3
  12.  @stevebeckerman4214  ignore the troll. He thinks he's in the right when he gets into accidents
    3
  13. @jamiepatterson1214  well, have fun trying to prove that in court. If a car has already begun their merge aka is establishing control of the lane, then it is your responsibility to maintain a safe space. It would be a different story if the other party didn't move in
    3
  14. ​@MrMcMuffinJr1999 wrong. The lane had already merged at that point so the cammer didn't have right of way when the other car was already merging. You're a laughing stock
    3
  15.  @BrandonDenny-we1rw  someone who is already merging should have right of way already as they established that direction. Yes, red car shouldn't have done what they did but the cammer did nothing to prevent said accident and only escalated the situation without speeding up. If a car has already merged you can't do much but let it go. Plus there was room behind her so she could have braked and let them in instead of feeling like she owns the road
    2
  16. Nope. Red car was already merging in and cammer had her feelings hurt
    2
  17.  @Jesssalyer  you would lose the case. If a car had already began to merge, you must yield. The judge would laugh at you and throw the book at you
    2
  18. ​@JazznRealHipHop in that case have fun with insurance going up and having tickets
    2
  19. ​@jeffrains9569 yeah you don't know how to drive. Please take the bus or bike
    1
  20. Good luck with that. Even lawyers wouldn't be able to fight the case
    1
  21.  @BrandonDenny-we1rw  did I say break the law? No. The courts and insurance may determine a higher liability for one of the drivers in this case. Insurance will always determine the fault based on whether the accident was preventable and who caused it. It's the job of the driver to prevent said accidents from happening to reduce liability. For example, if I was driving in the far right lane that was turning right and another driver had shown their turn signal to merge but didn't do so at last minute while I gave them plenty of opportunities to do so while maintaining a safe speed, do you think the insurance will held me or the other driver more liable?
    1
  22.  @BartSparrow123  like I mentioned in another reply, insurance may deem more fault on her as she said there was room to merge behind her but decided to escalate the situation. Insurance will determine based on whether accident was preventable and which party failed to drive safely. I have gotten into a similar incident a few years back where a SUV had their turn signal on for a minute or two but didn't merge. I was in the far right lane which turned right in an intersection and had backed off to let them in. They didn't do anything and when I decided to speed up a little (1 or 2 mph), they merged and hit me. Their insurance claimed full responsibility since I had maintained a safe distance and didn't speed up to let them in.
    1
  23.  @BrandonDenny-we1rw  wrong. The other driver was deemed 100 percent at fault. Mind you this was on the streets, not the freeway. The road I was driving on had the far right lane turning right onto an upcoming intersection. The SUV had their turn signal on for a minute or so but didn't merge. I had slowed down as there was no traffic behind me to let them in. They kept driving straight and when I was near them, they hit my driver side, causing some paint damage and damage to the driver side mirror. Had I sped up and hit them, it may have been different.
    1
  24. @BrandonDenny-we1rw  no but it's similar. As mentioned, the cammer may have more liability for failing to prevent an accident. Ask any lawyer and they will say the same thing.
    1
  25. @BrandonDenny-we1rw  plus with the cammer being cited she may have more to prove on her end since she may end up paying more. If the judge reviews the evidence and determines the ticket stands, the cammer loses more than the other driver.
    1
  26. @BrandonDenny-we1rw  lmao. Keep it up. I have people who work for CHP and know lawyers. They would still point out the same thing. Cammer had caused the whole incident and you still can't accept it. Tells a lot about your victim mentality and trying to blame other drivers for your problems. Seriously take the damn bus
    1
  27. @BrandonDenny-we1rw  oh yes. Typical excuse for a dead brain. You can drive on the shoulder to avoid accidents or are you stupid? Your reading skills are that of a 1 year old
    1
  28. No it won't. Know why? The red car was merging and cammer had caused unsafe driving in the situation. Most likely share fault
    1
  29.  @mijrelgeits4751  tell me you got into accidents where you are at fault without telling me. You have a ego where one day you will end up in the grave
    1